Loading...
(a) Purpose. To facilitate the provision of affordable housing or other public benefits.
(b) Applicability. Assessor’s Block No. 3762, Lots 106, 108, 109, 112, 116, and 117.
(c) Controls.
(1) Lots 108, 109, 117, and portions of Lot 116 shall have a base height limit of 85 feet, as shown on Height and Bulk District Map HT01 of the Zoning Map of the City and County of San Francisco.
(2) Lots 106, 113 and portions of Lots 112 and 116 shall have a base height limit of 130 feet, as shown on Height and Bulk District Map HT01 of the Zoning Map of the City and County of San Francisco.
(A) The height limit shall be 160 feet; and
(C) Notwithstanding the Apparent Mass Reduction controls in Section 270(h)(2), on Lots 106, 108, 109, 112, 116, and 117, the following Apparent Mass Reduction controls shall apply:
(i) on the building frontage on Harrison Street, the Apparent Mass Reduction requirement is 50%; and
(ii) on the building frontage on Fourth Street, there is no Apparent Mass Reduction Requirement.
(4) Conditional use authorization by the Planning Commission shall not be required for use of the exceptions in this Section 263.34.
(Added by Ord. 296-18, File No. 180184, App. 12/12/2018, Eff. 1/12/2019)
In the Balboa Reservoir Special Use District and the 48-X and 78-X Height and Bulk Districts, heights are more specifically prescribed for each Block, as defined in Section 249.90, pursuant to Figure 249.90-2.
(Added by Ord. 140-20, File No. 200422, App. 8/28/2020, Eff. 9/28/2020, Oper. 9/28/2020)
(a) Boundaries of the Stonestown Mixed-Use Height and Bulk District. The boundaries of the Stonestown Mixed-Use Height and Bulk District are set forth in Sectional Map HT13 of the Zoning Map of the City and County of San Francisco and include all areas that are the subject of the Stonestown Special Use District set forth in Planning Code Section 249.9, as shown on Special Use District Map SU13.
(b) Purpose. The purpose of the Stonestown Mixed-Use Height and Bulk District is to enable development of the Stonestown Special Use District as a high-density, mixed-use, sustainable community consistent with the Purposes set forth in Planning Code Section 249.9 and the Stonestown Design Standards and Guidelines (DSG) referenced therein.
(c) Controls.
(1) In the Stonestown Mixed-Use Height and Bulk District, height and bulk and definitions applicable thereto are governed by Planning Code Section 249.9 (the Stonestown Special Use District) and the DSG referenced therein.
(2) Amendments to the height and bulk controls in this Stonestown Mixed-Use Height and Bulk District shall be as provided in Section 249.9.
(Added by Ord. 204-24, File No. 240409, App. 8/1/2024, Eff. 9/1/2024, Oper. 9/1/2024)
(See Interpretations related to this Section.)
(a) The limits upon the bulk of buildings and structures shall be as stated in this Section 270 and in Sections 271 and 272. The terms Diagonal Dimension, Height, Length, and Plan Dimensions shall be as defined in this Code. In each height and bulk district, the maximum plan dimensions shall be as specified in the following table, at all horizontal cross-sections above the height indicated.
District Symbol on Zoning Map | Height Above Which Maximum Dimensions Apply (in feet) | Maximum Plan Dimensions (in feet) | |
Length | Diagonal Dimension |
District Symbol on Zoning Map | Height Above Which Maximum Dimensions Apply (in feet) | Maximum Plan Dimensions (in feet) | |
Length | Diagonal Dimension | ||
A | 40 | 110 | 125 |
B | 50 | 110 | 125 |
C | 80 | 110 | 125 |
D | 40 | 110 | 140 |
E | 65 | 110 | 140 |
F | 80 | 110 | 140 |
G | 80 | 170 | 200 |
H | 100 | 170 | 200 |
I | 150 | 170 | 200 |
J | 40 | 250 | 300 |
K | 60 | 250 | 300 |
L | 80 | 250 | 300 |
M | 100 | 250 | 300 |
N | 40 | 50 | 100 |
R | This table not applicable. But see Section 270(e). | ||
R-2 | This table not applicable. But see Section 270(f). | ||
V | 110 | 140 | |
V | * At setback height established pursuant to Section 253.2. | ||
OS | See Section 290. | ||
S | This table not applicable. But see Section 270(d). | ||
S-2 | This table not applicable. But see Section 270(d). | ||
T | At setback height established pursuant to Section 132.2, but no higher than 80 feet. | 110 | 125 |
X | This table not applicable. But see Section 260(a)(3). | ||
TB | This table not applicable. But see Section 263.18. | ||
CP | This table not applicable. But see Section 263.24. | ||
HP | This table not applicable. But see Section 263.25. | ||
PM | This table not applicable. But see Section 249.64 Parkmerced Special Use District. | ||
TI | This table not applicable. But see Section 263.26. | ||
EP | This table not applicable. But see Section 263.27. | ||
CS | This table not applicable. But see Section 270(h). | ||
IB | This table not applicable. But see Section 249.84 India Basin Special Use District. | ||
PY | This table not applicable. But see Section 249.98 Potrero Yard Special Use District. | ||
(b) These limits shall not apply to the buildings, structures and equipment listed in Section 260(b)(2) (K), (L), (M) and (N) of this Code, subject to the limitations expressed therein.
(c) Maximum plan lengths and diagonal dimensions do not apply to cornices or other decorative projections.
(d) The bulk limits contained in this subsection shall apply in S and S-2 Bulk Districts as designated on Sectional Map Nos. 1H, 2H and 7H of the Zoning Map.
(1) Base. The base is the lowest portion of the building extending vertically to a streetwall height up to 1.25 times the width of the widest abutting street or 50 feet, whichever is more. There are no length or diagonal dimension limitations applicable to the base. The building base shall be delineated from the lower and upper tower and related to abutting buildings by a setback, cornice line or equivalent projection or other appropriate means. In the C-3-O(SD) District additional requirements for building base and streetwall articulation and setbacks are described in Section 132.1.
(2) Lower Tower.
(A) Dimensions. Bulk controls for the lower tower apply to that portion of the building height above the base as shown on Chart B. For buildings of less than 160 feet in height, the lower tower controls are the only bulk controls above the base of the building. The bulk controls for the lower tower are a maximum length of 160 feet, a maximum floor size of 20,000 square feet, and a maximum diagonal dimension of 190 feet.

(B) Additional Bulk for Elevators. Solely in order to accommodate additional elevators required by tall buildings the lower portion (up to the height shown on Chart B) of the lower tower of a building 500 feet tall or taller may be enlarged up to a maximum length of 190 feet, a maximum diagonal dimension of 230 feet and a maximum floor size of up to 25,000 square feet without a corresponding reduction in upper floor size.
(3) Upper Tower.
(A) Dimensions. Upper tower bulk controls apply to buildings taller than 160 feet. They apply to the upper tower portion of a building up to the height shown on Chart B, which height excludes the vertical attachment and other features exempted by Section 260 and excludes the extended upper tower height exceptions provided for in Section 263.7 of this Code. The bulk controls for the upper tower are: a maximum length of 130 feet; a maximum average floor size of 12,000 square feet; a maximum floor size for any floor of 17,000 square feet; and a maximum average diagonal measure of 160 feet. In determining the average floor size of the upper tower, areas with a cross-sectional area of less than 4,000 square feet may not be counted and sculptured architectural forms that contain large volumes of space but no usable floors shall be included in average floor size calculation by computing the cross section at 12.5-foot intervals.
(B) Volume Reduction. When the average floor size of the lower tower exceeds 5,000 square feet, the volume of the upper tower shall be reduced to a percentage of the volume that would occur if the average floor size of the lower tower were extended to the proposed building height. The percentage varies with the bulk of the lower tower and with whether or not a height extension is employed pursuant to Section 263.7 and is shown on Chart C. In achieving the required volume reduction, a setback or change in profile at a specific elevation is not required.
(C) Extensions. Extension of the upper tower above the otherwise allowable height limits may be permitted as provided in Section 263.9.
(D) Termination of the Tower. The top of the tower shall be massed in a manner that will create a visually distinctive roof or other termination of the building facade. Modifications to a proposed project may be required, in the manner provided in Section 309, to achieve this purpose.
(4) Buildings Taller than 650 Feet in the S-2 Bulk District. For buildings taller than 650 feet in height in the S-2 Bulk District, the following controls shall apply in lieu of the controls of subsections (1)-(3):
(A) Lower Tower. There are no bulk controls for the lower tower except as required by Section 132.1. The lower tower for such buildings shall be defined as the bottom two-thirds of the building from sidewalk grade to roof of the uppermost occupied floor.
(B) Upper Tower. The average floor size of the upper tower shall not exceed 75 percent of the average floor size of the lower tower, and the average diagonal dimension shall not exceed 87 percent of the average diagonal dimension of the lower tower.
(i) In determining the average floor size and average diagonal of the upper tower, unoccupied architectural elements permitted according to Section 260(b)(1)(M), except for levels consisting of singular spires with a diagonal in cross-section of less than 18 feet, may be included in the calculations if the Planning Commission determines, according to the procedures of Section 309, that such unoccupied architectural elements produce a distinct visual tapering of the building as intended by the controls of subsection (B) and create an elegant profile for the upper tower from key public vantage points throughout the City and beyond. In calculating the floor size and diagonal of such architectural elements, a cross section floor proscribed by the most distant outside points of all elements shall be assumed at 12.5-foot intervals.
(e) Rincon Hill and South Beach. In Bulk District R (Rincon Hill and South Beach DTR Districts), bulk limitations are as follows:
(2) Tower Bulk and Spacing. All portions of structures above the podium height as described in Section 263.19 shall meet the following bulk limitations, as illustrated in Chart C.
(A) Buildings between the podium height limit and 240 feet in height may not exceed a plan length of 90 feet and a diagonal dimension of 120 square feet.
(B) Buildings between 241 and 300 feet in height may not exceed a plan length of 100 feet and a diagonal dimension of 125 feet, and may not exceed a maximum average floor area of 8,500 gross square feet.
(C) Buildings between 301 and 350 feet in height may not exceed a plan length of 115 feet and a diagonal dimension of 145 feet. They may not exceed a maximum average floor area of 9,000 gross square feet.
(D) Buildings between 351 and 550 feet in height may not exceed a plan length of 115 feet and a diagonal dimension of 145 feet. They may not exceed a maximum average floor area of 10,000 gross square feet.
(E) To allow variety in the articulation of towers, the floor plates of individual floors may exceed the maximums described above by as much as 5 percent, provided the maximum average floor plate is met.
(F) To encourage tower sculpting, the gross floor area of the top one-third of the tower shall be reduced by 10 percent from the maximum floor plates described in (A) - (D) above, unless the overall tower floor plate is reduced by an equal or greater volume.
(G) In order to provide adequate sunlight and air to streets and open spaces, a minimum distance of 115 feet must be preserved between all structures above 110 feet in height at all levels above 110 feet in height. Spacing shall be measured horizontally from the outside surface of the exterior wall of the subject building to the nearest point on the closest structure above 110 feet in height. Any project that is permitted pursuant to the exception described in Section 270(e)(3) shall not be considered for the purposes of measuring tower spacing pursuant to this Section.
(3) Exceptions to tower spacing and upper tower sculpting requirements in Rincon Hill DTR. An exception to the 115 feet tower spacing requirement and the upper tower sculpting requirement described in (e)(2)(F) and (G) above may be granted to a project only on Block 3747 on a lot formed by the merger of part or all of Lots 001E, 002 and 006, pursuant to the procedures described in 309.1 of this Code provided that projects meet the following criteria:
(A) Applications for environmental review and conditional use related to a building above 85 feet in height on the subject lot have been filed with the Department prior to March 1, 2003 and February 1, 2005, respectively;
(B) Given the 115 tower spacing requirement described in (G) above, the existence of an adjacent building greater than 85 feet in height precludes the development of a tower on the subject lot;
(C) The subject lot has a total area of no less than 35,000 square feet;
(D) The proposed project is primarily residential and has an area of no more than 528,000 gross square feet;
(E) The proposed project conforms to all other controls described or referenced in Section 827 and any other controls in this Code related to the Rincon Hill DTR District.
(F) For the purposes of subsection (D) above, the term "gross square feet" shall be the sum of the gross areas of all floors of a building or buildings above street grade measured from the exterior faces of exterior walls or from the center lines of walls separating two buildings, excluding area below street grade. Where columns are outside and separated from an exterior wall (curtain wall) which encloses the building space or are otherwise so arranged that the curtain wall is clearly separated from the structural members, the exterior face of the curtain wall shall be the line of measurement, and the area of the columns themselves at each floor shall also be counted.
(4) Allowance for limited reduction in spacing from existing towers in Rincon Hill DTR. To allow limited variation in tower placement from towers for which a certificate of occupancy has been issued prior to February 1, 2005, a reduction in tower spacing described in (e)(2)(G) above may be granted pursuant to the procedures described in 309.1 of this Code if all the following criteria are met:
(A) For every percent reduction from the maximum average floor area as described in (2) above, an equal percent reduction in tower separation may be granted subject to the following limits:
(i) Up to a height of one-and-one-half times the maximum permitted podium height, tower spacing described in (e)(2)(G) above may be reduced by not more than 15 percent;
(ii) up to a height of 180 feet, tower spacing described in (e)(2)(G) above may be reduced by not more than 10 percent; and
(iii) all floors above 180 feet achieve the full 115-foot minimum tower spacing requirement described in (e)(2)(G) above. A project may average the tower separation of all floors below 180 feet so long as the requirements of (ii) and (iii) herein are satisfied.

(5) Exceptions to Tower Bulk, Upper Tower Sculpting and Tower Spacing Requirements on Block 3764. Exceptions to the tower bulk, upper tower sculpting and tower spacing requirements described in Subsections (e)(2)(A), (F) and (G) above may be granted to a project only on Block 3764, Lot 063, pursuant to the procedures described in Section 309.1 of this Code, provided that the project meets all of the following criteria:
(A) Within 115 feet of Block 3764, Lot 063, there is a tower greater than 85 feet in height as part of a building that has received a First Construction Document;
(B) The project involves the construction of, or alteration to, a tower of no more than 250 feet in height;
(C) The subject lot has a total area of no more than 15,000 square feet;
(D) A minimum distance of 82 feet is preserved between any structures on the parcel and any other structure on or off the parcel above 110 feet in height at all levels above 110 feet in height. Spacing shall be measured horizontally from the outside surface of the exterior wall of structures, which shall include those features described in Planning Code Section 136(c)(2) and (3); and
(E) The project is primarily residential, contains no more than 250,000 gross square feet and provides on-site inclusionary affordable units equivalent to 15% of all units constructed on the site, which shall be subject to the requirements of the Inclusionary Affordable Housing Program under Planning Code Section 415 et seq., and the City's Inclusionary Affordable Housing Program Monitoring and Procedures Manual, as amended from time to time.
(f) Van Ness & Market Residential Special Use District. In Bulk District R-2 (Van Ness & Market Residential Special Use District), bulk limitations are as follows:
(1) Tower Bulk and Spacing. In the R-2 bulk district there are no bulk limitations below the podium height, and structures above the podium height shall meet the bulk limitations described in subsection (e)(2)(A)-(E). To ensure tower sculpting, the gross floor area of the top one-third of the height of the tower shall be reduced by not less than 10 percent from the maximum floor plates described in subsections (e)(2)(A) – (E) above, and the average diagonal of the top one-third of the height of the tower shall be reduced by not less than 13% from the average diagonal of the tower, unless the overall tower volume is reduced by an equal or greater volume.
(2) Exceptions. In the R-2 bulk district, the Planning Commission may grant bulk exceptions through the procedures and findings of Section 309(a)(17) to increase the allowed bulk of buildings up to the limits described in subsections (A) – (D) below. The procedures for granting exceptions to bulk limits described in Section 272 shall not apply.
(A) Towers up to 350 feet in height may not exceed an average floor area of 10,000 gross square feet.
(B) Towers taller than 350 feet may not exceed an average floor area of 12,000 gross square feet, maximum plan length of 150 feet, and maximum diagonal dimension of 190 feet.
(C) Towers taller than 550 feet in height districts of 590 feet and greater may not exceed an average floor area of 18,500 gross square feet between a podium height of 140 feet and 170 feet. Building mass above 150 feet shall be set back at least 10 feet from the property line for a minimum of 90% of all street frontages.
(D) Exceptions to the tower sculpting requirements described in subsection (f)(1) above may be considered up to the limits as follows:
(i) For towers less than 400 feet in height, the provision may be fully waived.
(ii) For towers taller than 400 feet in height, at least one-quarter of the tower’s floors shall be reduced by not less than 10% from the maximum floor areas described in (2)(B) above.
(iii) For towers between 500 and 550 feet in height, the average diagonal of the upper one-third of the height of the tower shall be reduced by not less than 5% of maximum diagonal dimension described in subsection 270(e), above.
(3) In order to provide adequate sunlight and air to streets and open spaces, a minimum distance of 115 feet must be preserved between all structures above the applicable podium height for the subject development lot. Spacing shall be measured horizontally from the outside surface of the exterior wall of the subject building to the nearest point on the closest structure above 120 feet in height.
(4) Exceptions shall be permitted as described in section (2)(a)-(c) above. The procedures for granting special exceptions to bulk limits described in Section 272 shall not apply.
(g) 1500 Mission Street Special Use District (Planning Code Section 249.12). In Bulk District R-3, bulk limitations are as follows:
(1) In height districts 130/240-R-3 and 130/400-R-3, there are no bulk limitations below 130 feet in height, and structures above 130 feet in height shall meet the following bulk limitations.
(A) Buildings between the podium height limit and 240 feet in height may not exceed a plan length of 170 feet and a diagonal dimension of 225 feet.
(B) Buildings between 241 and 400 feet in height may not exceed a plan length of 156 feet and a diagonal dimension of 165 feet, and may not exceed a maximum average floor area of 13,100 gross square feet. To encourage tower sculpting, the gross floor area of the top one-third of the tower shall be reduced by 7% from the maximum floor plate of the tower above the podium height limit unless the overall tower floor plate is reduced by an equal or greater volume.
(C) To provide adequate sunlight and air to streets and open spaces, a minimum distance of 115 feet must be preserved between all structures above 130 feet in height at all levels above 130 feet in height. Spacing shall be measured horizontally from the outside surface of the exterior wall of the subject building to the nearest point on the closest structure above 130 feet in height.
(2) The procedures for granting special exceptions to bulk limits described in Section 272 shall not apply.
(h) Bulk Limits within the Central SoMa Special Use District. In the CS Bulk District and height and bulk districts that allow heights of 65 feet and above and that are within the Central South of Market Special Use District, the bulk limits contained in this subsection 270(h) shall apply.
(1) Definitions. For purposes of this subsection, the definitions of Section 102 and the following definitions apply unless otherwise specified in this Section:
Apparent Mass Reduction. The percentage of the Skyplane that does not include the Projected Building Mass from the subject lot. For purposes of calculating Apparent Mass Reduction, any portion of the Projected Building Mass that projects above the Height limit shall be added to the projection within the Skyplane.
Base Height. The lowest Height from which the Skyplane is measured.
Lower Tower. The lower two-thirds of the Tower Portion of a Tower, rounded to the nearest floor.
Major Street. 2nd Street, 3rd Street, 4th Street, 5th Street, 6th Street, Mission Street, Howard Street, Folsom Street, Harrison Street, Bryant Street, Brannan Street, and Townsend Street.
Narrow Street. A right-of-way with a width of 40 feet or less and more than 60 feet from an intersection with a street wider than 40 feet.
Projected Building Mass. The portion of the subject building that projects into the Skyplane as viewed from the most directly opposite property line. This volume includes all parts and features of a building, including but not limited to any feature listed in Section 260(b).
Skyplane.
(i) A plane along each street-facing property line of the subject lot extending:
(aa) Vertically from the Base Height up to the Height limit for the subject lot; and
(bb) Horizontally for the length of the street-facing property line.
(ii) The figure below illustrates how a skyplane is to be measured:

Tower. Any building taller than 160 feet in Height.
Tower Portion. The portion of a Tower above 85 feet in Height.
Upper Tower. The upper one-third of the Tower Portion of a Tower, rounded to the nearest floor.
(2) Apparent Mass Reduction. Projects in the CS Bulk District are subject to the Apparent Mass Reduction controls of Table 270(h), as well as the setback requirements of Section 132.4.
Building Frontage | Side of the Street | Height District | Base Height* | Apparent Mass Reduction |
Building Frontage | Side of the Street | Height District | Base Height* | Apparent Mass Reduction |
Major Street | Southeast and southwest | 130 feet | 85 feet | 67% |
Major Street | Southeast and southwest | 160 feet | 85 feet | 80% |
Major Street | Northeast and northwest | 130 feet | 85 feet | 50% |
Major Street | Northeast and northwest | 160 feet | 85 feet | 70% |
Major Street | All | Above 160 feet | 85 feet | None for the Tower Portion, as defined in Section 132.4. 80% for the remainder of the building, using a Height limit of 160 feet for purposes of this calculation. |
Narrow Street | Northeast and northwest | 130
feet and 160 feet | 35 feet | 85% |
Narrow Street | Northeast and northwest | 65 feet | 35 feet | 50% |
Narrow Street | Northeast and northwest | 85 feet | 35 feet | 70% |
Narrow Street | All | Above 160 feet | 35 feet | None for the Tower Portion, as defined in Section 132.4. 85% for the remainder of the building, using a Height limit of 160 feet for purposes of this calculation. |
Mid-Block Passage | All | All | None | The controls of Section 261.1(d)(3) shall apply. ** |
Perry Street | Northwest | All | None | The controls of Section 261.1(d)(1) shall apply. ** |
Stillman Street | Southeast | All | 35 feet | Between 2nd and 3rd Streets: the controls of Section 261.1 shall apply. Between 3rd and 4th Streets: the controls of Section 261.1 shall not apply, and for the first 60 feet from an intersection, 0% apparent mass reduction is required; elsewhere, 85% apparent mass reduction is required. |
Other Street | All | All | Width of the abutting street | Same as the Apparent Mass Reduction for projects along Major Streets in the same height district and on the same side of the street. |
*** Any building that exceeds the height allowed by the applicable Height District shall comply with the apparent mass reduction requirement in this Table based on its actual height.
(3) Bulk Controls for Buildings Towers.
(A) Maximum Floor Area for the Tower Portion.
(i) For residential and hotel uses, the maximum Gross Floor Area of any floor is 12,000 gross square feet.
(ii) For all other uses, the maximum Gross Floor Area of any floor is 17,000 gross square feet and the average Gross Floor Area for all floors in the Tower Portion shall not exceed 15,000 gross square feet.
(B) Maximum Plan Dimensions for the Tower Portion.
(i) The maximum length shall be 150 feet.
(ii) The maximum diagonal shall be 190 feet.
(iii) For buildings with a Height of 250 feet or more, the average Gross Floor Area of the Upper Tower shall not exceed 85 percent of the average Gross Floor Area of the Lower Tower, and the average diagonal of the Upper Tower shall not exceed 92.5 percent of the average diagonal of the Lower Tower.
(Amended by Ord. 414-85, App. 9/17/85; Ord. 532-85, App. 12/4/85; Ord. 131-87, App. 4/24/87; Ord. 537-88, App. 12/16/88; Ord. 217-05, File No. 050865, App. 8/19/2005; Ord. 94-06, File No. 050182, App. 5/19/2006; Ord. 72-08, File No. 071157, App. 4/3/2008; Ord. 298-08, File No. 081153, App. 12/19/2008; Ord. 208-10, File No. 208-10, App. 8/3/2010; Ord. 90-11, File No. 110301, App. 6/9/2011, Eff. 7/9/2011; Ord. 98-11, File No. 110229, App. 6/15/2011, Eff. 7/15/2011; Ord. 144-11
, File No. 110625, App. 7/18/2011, Eff. 8/17/2011; Ord. 182-12
, File No. 120665, App. 8/8/2012, Eff. 9/7/2012; Ord. 56-13
, File No. 130062, App. 3/28/2013, Eff. 4/27/2013; Ord. 217-15
, File No. 151063, App. 12/16/2015, Eff. 1/15/2016; Ord. 101-17, File No. 170348, App. 5/24/2017, Eff. 6/23/2017; Ord. 296-18, File No. 180184, App. 12/12/2018, Eff. 1/12/2019; Ord. 206-19, File No. 190048, App. 9/13/2019, Eff. 10/14/2019; Ord. 126-20
, File No. 200559, App. 7/31/2020, Eff. 8/31/2020; Ord. 47-21, File No. 201175, App. 4/16/2021, Eff. 5/17/2021; Ord. 33-24, File No. 231144, App. 2/21/2024, Eff. 3/23/2024; Ord. 58-24, File No. 231256, App. 3/22/2024, Eff. 4/22/2024)
AMENDMENT HISTORY
Table 270 row PM added; Ord. 90-11, Eff. 7/9/2011. Table 270 row TI added; Ord. 98-11
, Eff. 7/15/2011. Table 270 row EP added; Ord. 144-11
, Eff. 8/17/2011. Table 270 row S-2 added; divisions (d) and (d)(1) amended; new division (d)(4) added; Ord. 182-12
, Eff. 9/7/2012. Table 270 row PM amended; former divisions (e)(3)(i) through (vi) redesignated as (e)(3)(A) through (F); former divisions (e)(4)(i) through (iv) redesignated as (e)(4)(A) through (e)(4)(A)(iii); Chart C replaced; Ord. 56-13
, Eff. 4/27/2013. Divisions (e)(2)(I), (e)(3)(B), and (e)(3)(F) amended; Division (e)(5) added; Ord. 217-15
, Eff. 1/15/2016. Division (g) added; Ord. 101-17, Eff. 6/23/2017. Table 270 row CS added; divisions (h)-(h)(4) and Table 270(h) added; Ord. 296-18, Eff. 1/12/2019. Division (a) amended; Ord. 206-19, Eff. 10/14/2019. Divisions (f) and (f)(1) amended; former divisions (f)(2)-(3) redesignated as (f)(3)-(4) and amended; new divisions (f)(2)-(f)(2)(D)(iii) added; Ord. 126-20
, Eff. 8/31/2020. Division (h) amended; Table 270(h) amended; Ord. 47-21, Eff. 5/17/2021. Table 270 row IB added; Ord. 33-24, Eff. 3/23/2024. Division (a) amended; Table 270 row PY added; Ord. 58-24, Eff. 4/22/2024.
(a) Purpose. There is a disproportionately high number of large lots in historically industrial and mixed-use areas, particularly in the South of Market, Showplace Square, Mission and Central Waterfront areas, which could be developed with long, monotonous and massive buildings. In recognition of this, special controls to allow for appropriate building articulation and mass reduction are provided in this Section.
(b) Applicability. This Section 270.1 applies to all buildings in the Eastern Neighborhoods Mixed Use Districts that have street or alley frontage greater than 200 feet in length, and that receive their first site or building permit after the effective date of this Section 270.1.
(c) Controls. Buildings subject to this Section must incorporate one or more mass reduction breaks in the building that reduce the horizontal scale of the building into discrete sections not more than 200 feet in length. As illustrated in Figure 270.1A, such mass reduction breaks shall:
(1) be not less than 30 feet in width;
(2) be not less than 60 feet in depth from the street-facing building facade;
(3) extend up to the sky from a level not higher than 25 feet above grade or the third story, whichever is lower; and
(4) result in discrete building sections with a maximum plan length along the street frontage not greater than 200 feet.
Bays, balconies or other obstructions permitted over streets and alleys in Section 136(c), shall not be considered for the calculation of the above dimensions.

(d) Modifications. The Planning Commission may modify or waive this requirement through the process set forth in Section 329. When considering any such application, the Commission shall consider the following criteria:
(1) no more than 50% of the required mass is reduced unless special circumstances are evident;
(2) the depth of any mass reduction breaks provided is not less than 15 feet from the front facade, unless special circumstances are evident;
(3) the proposed building envelope can be demonstrated to achieve a distinctly superior effect of reducing the apparent horizontal dimension of the building; and
(4) the proposed building achieves unique and superior architectural design.
(Added by Ord. 298-08, File No. 081153, App. 12/19/2008; amended by Ord. 102-16
, File No. 160346, App. 6/24/2016, Eff. 7/24/2016)
AMENDMENT HISTORY
SEC. 270.2. SPECIAL BULK AND OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT: MID-BLOCK ALLEYS IN LARGE LOT DEVELOPMENT IN THE EASTERN NEIGHBORHOODS MIXED USE DISTRICTS, SOUTH OF MARKET NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL TRANSIT DISTRICT, FOLSOM STREET NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL TRANSIT DISTRICT, REGIONAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, C-3 DISTRICT, AND DTR DISTRICT.
(a) Findings. The historically industrial parts of the City, including the South of Market, Showplace Square, Central Waterfront, and Mission, typically have very large blocks. In the South of Market, a typical block is 825 feet in length and 550 feet in width; in Showplace Square and the Central Waterfront blocks extend up to 800 feet in length and greater; and in the Mission many blocks are over 500 feet in length. In areas of the City historically developed as moderate and high-density residential and commercial environments, the block pattern is much smaller, with many alternate and redundant paths of travels, service alleys, and public mid-block pedestrian walkways and stairways: the typical North of Market block is 275 feet in width and not more than 412.5 feet in length, often with minor alleys bisecting these blocks further into smaller increments.
Large blocks inhibit pedestrian movement and convenience by significantly lengthening walking distances between points, thereby reducing the ability and likelihood of people to walk between destinations, including reducing access to and likelihood of using transit. Academic studies have shown that the likelihood of people to walk for trips of all purposes, including walking to transit stops, declines substantially above distances as low as 1/5th of a mile, and that the propensity to walk is very elastic for distances of one mile or less and heavily dependent on distance and route barriers (Berman, Journal of American Planning Literature, May 1996). People are generally willing to walk not more than 1/3-mile to access rail transit, and less to access bus transit. In the Eastern Neighborhoods Mixed Use, South of Market Mixed Use, C-M, and DTR Districts, and South-of-Market portion of the C-3 Districts, longer walking distances due to large blocks generally lengthen walking distances by up to 1,000 feet or more for even the shortest trips, a major factor in reduced use of transit in these areas. In areas with large blocks, walking distances between destinations can be between 50% and 300% longer than for areas with smaller blocks and more route choices (Hess, Places, Summer 1997). In the South of Market area, for example, the distance between destinations for walking trips can be as much as 2.5 times longer than a trip between destinations similarly situated apart north of Market Street. Given equivalent densities and distributions of development, where walking distances are greater due to longer and larger blocks, residents have access to up to 50% fewer destinations (e.g. shops, services, transit) for equal walking distances (Id.). Greater walking distances and fewer route choices also severely degrade accessibility to transit, services, and shops for people with disabilities and the elderly (Kulash, Development, July/August 1990). Because there are fewer pedestrian route choices and people must walk on fewer, more-highly trafficked and busier streets for longer distances, the quality of the pedestrian experience is severely diminished and there are more conflicts with motor vehicles, with corresponding heightened concerns for pedestrian safety on major streets.
Large blocks also increase vehicular and service demand on streets. Where there are no secondary streets or service alleys, all vehicular functions (including service loading as well as private vehicular access to off-street parking) are concentrated onto fewer streets, increasing traffic volumes on these streets and creating significant and frequent conflicts with automobile traffic, transit, bicycles, and pedestrian activity.
Where industrial uses with low densities of workers and residents remain in place, the condition of large blocks is not a problem. However, where land use changes occur with new development and the intensity and density of residential and employment population are increased by new development, there is thus a significant new need created to improve pedestrian and vehicular circulation by mitigating the size the blocks, providing alternate and redundant paths of travel, and creating a more pedestrian-accessible environment.
(b) Purpose. The mid-block alley requirements of this Section are intended to ameliorate the conditions and impacts described in the Findings of subsection (a) above and make the subject areas appropriate for a higher density of activity and population in areas being targeted for more intense development.
(c) Applicability. This Section 270.2
applies to all new construction on parcels that have one or more street or alley frontages of over 200 linear feet on a block face longer than 400 feet between intersections, and are in the C-3 Districts, if located south of Market Street, or in the South of Market Neighborhood Commercial Transit District, Folsom Street Neighborhood Commercial Transit District, Regional Commercial District, Eastern Neighborhoods Mixed Use Districts, or DTR Districts, except for parcels in the RH DTR District, which are subject to Section 827.
(d) Requirements.
(1) New construction on lots with greater than 300 linear feet of street frontage shall provide a publicly-accessible mid-block alley for the entire depth of the property, generally located toward the middle of the subject block face, perpendicular to the subject frontage and connecting to any existing streets and alleys. For development lots with frontage on more than one street that exceeds the above dimensions, one such mid-block alley will be required per frontage.
(2) For new construction on lots with frontage greater than 200 linear feet but less than 300 feet the project shall provide a publicly-accessible mid-block alley for the entire depth of the property where any of the following criteria are met:
(A) There is an opportunity to establish a through-block connection between two existing alleys or streets, or
(B) A portion of the subject frontage extends over the central half of the block face, or
(C) Where it is deemed necessary by the Planning Department and Commission to introduce alleys to reduce the scale of large development, particularly in areas with a surrounding pattern of alleys.
(3) For new construction within the Van Ness & Market Residential Special Use District on lots with greater than 300 linear feet of street frontage, the project shall provide a publicly-accessible mid-block alley between any two frontages that have at least 200 feet of length each. Such alley shall be subject to all requirements of this Section 270.2, except that the requirements of subsection 270.2(e)(14) shall not apply. A project subject to this subsection 270.2(d)(3) may seek an exception to the requirements of Section 270.2(e)(6) pursuant to the procedures and findings of Section 309(a)(18).
(e) Design and Performance Standards. The alleys provided per subsections (a) and (b) above shall meet the following standards:
(1) Generally be located as close to the middle portion of the subject block face as possible, perpendicular to the subject frontage and connect to existing adjacent streets and alleys;
(2) Provide pedestrian access;
(3) Provide no, limited, or full vehicular access, as specific conditions warrant;
(4) Have a minimum width of 20 feet, exclusive of those obstructions allowed within setbacks pursuant to Section 136. In RED, RED-MX, WMUG, WMUO, and SALI Districts, the minimum width shall be 30 feet;
(5) Have a minimum clear walking width of 10 feet free of any obstructions in the case of a pedestrian-only right-of-way, and dual sidewalks each of not less than six feet in width with not less than four feet minimum clear walking width in the case of an alley with vehicular access;
(6) Have at least 60 percent of the area of the alley or pathway open to the sky. Obstructions permitted within setbacks pursuant to Section 136 may be located within the portion of the alley or pathway that is required to be open to the sky. All portions of the alley or pathway not open to the sky shall have a minimum clearance height from grade of 15 feet at all points;
(7) Provide such ingress and egress as will make the area easily accessible to the general public;
(8) Be protected from uncomfortable wind, as called for elsewhere in this Code;
(9) Be ungated and publicly accessible 24 hours per day, as defined elsewhere in this Section 270.2;
(10) Be provided with appropriate paving, furniture, and other amenities that encourage pedestrian use, and be landscaped to greatest extent feasible;
(11) Be provided with ample pedestrian lighting to ensure pedestrian comfort and safety;
(12) Be free of any changes in grade or steps not required by the underlying natural topography and average grade; and
(13) Be fronted by active ground floor uses, as defined in Section 145.1, to the extent feasible.
(f) Maintenance. Mid-block paths and alleys required under this Section shall be maintained at no public expense. The owner of the property on which the alley is located shall maintain it by keeping the area clean and free of litter and by keeping it in an acceptable state of repair. Conditions intended to assure continued maintenance of the right-of-way for the actual lifetime of the building giving rise to the open space requirement may be imposed in accordance with the provisions of Section 309.1 for DTR or 329 for Eastern Neighborhoods Mixed Use Districts.
(g) Informational Plaque. Prior to issuance of a permit of occupancy, a plaque shall be placed in a publicly conspicuous location for pedestrian viewing. The plaque shall state the right of the public to pass through the alley and stating the name and address of the owner or owner's agent responsible for maintenance. The plaque shall be of no less than 24 inches by 36 inches in size.
(h) Property owners providing a pathway or alley under this section will hold harmless the City and County of San Francisco, its officers, agents and employees, from any damage or injury caused by the design, construction or maintenance of the right-of-way, and are solely liable for any damage or loss occasioned by any act or neglect in respect to the design, construction or maintenance of the right-of-way.
(i) Any non-vehicular portions of such a pathway or alley, including sidewalks or other walking areas, seating areas, or landscaping, may count toward any open space requirements of this Code which permit publicly-accessible open space, provided that such space meets the standards of Section 135. In C-3 Districts, the non-vehicular portions of such a pathway or alley may count towards the open space requirements of Section 138 of this Code, so long as the pathway or alley is located at street grade and meets the requirements of Section 138 and of this Section.
(Added by Ord. 298-08, File No. 081153, App. 12/19/2008; amended by Ord. 85-10, File No. 091271, App. 4/30/2010; Ord. 42-13
, File No. 130002, App. 3/28/2013, Eff. 4/27/2013; Ord. 188-15
, File No. 150871, App. 11/4/2015, Eff. 12/4/2015; amended by Ord. 102-16
, File No. 160346, App. 6/24/2016, Eff. 7/24/2016; Ord. 296-18, File No. 180184, App. 12/12/2018, Eff. 1/12/2019; Ord. 126-20, File No. 200559, App. 7/31/2020, Eff. 8/31/2020)
AMENDMENT HISTORY
Division (e)(4) amended; Ord. 42-13
, Eff. 4/27/2013. Division (g) amended; Ord. 188-15
, Eff. 12/4/2015. Section header and divisions (c), (e)(4), and (e)(6) amended; Ord. 102-16
, Eff. 7/24/2016. Section header and division (c) amended; Ord. 296-18, Eff. 1/12/2019. Division (d)(3) added; Ord. 126-20, Eff. 8/31/2020.
(a) General. The bulk limits prescribed by Section 270 have been carefully considered in relation to objectives and policies for conservation and change in districts other than C-3. There may be some exceptional cases in which these limits may properly be permitted to be exceeded to a certain degree; however, following public review and exploration of alternatives, provided there are adequate compensating factors. Such deviation might occur, when the criteria of this Section are met, for one or both of the following positive reasons:
(1) Achievement of a distinctly better design, in both a public and a private sense, than would be possible with strict adherence to the bulk limits, avoiding an unnecessary prescription of building form while carrying out the intent of the bulk limits and the principles and policies of the General Plan.
(2) Development of a building or structure with widespread public service benefits and significance to the community at large, where compelling functional requirements of the specific building or structure make necessary such a deviation.
(b) Procedures. Deviations from the bulk limits under this section shall be permitted only upon approval by the City Planning Commission according to the procedures for conditional use approval in Section 303 of this Code, or for the procedures for design review in Section 329 of this Code for subject projects in the Eastern Neighborhoods Mixed Use Districts.
(1) The appearance of bulk in the building, structure or development shall be reduced by means of at least one and preferably a combination of the following factors, so as to produce the impression of an aggregate of parts rather than a single building mass:
(A) Major variations in the planes of wall surfaces, in either depth or direction, that significantly alter the mass;
(B) Significant differences in the heights of various portions of the building, structure or development that divide the mass into distinct elements;
(C) Differences in materials, colors or scales of the facades that produce separate major elements;
(D) Compensation for those portions of the building, structure or development that may exceed the bulk limits by corresponding reduction of other portions below the maximum bulk permitted; and
(E) In cases where two or more buildings, structures or towers are contained within a single development, a wide separation between such buildings, structures or towers.
(2) In every case the building, structure or development shall be made compatible with the character and development of the surrounding area by means of all of the following factors:
(A) A silhouette harmonious with natural land-forms and building patterns, including the patterns produced by height limits;
(B) Either maintenance of an overall height similar to that of surrounding development or a sensitive transition, where appropriate, to development of a dissimilar character;
(C) Use of materials, colors and scales either similar to or harmonizing with those of nearby development; and
(D) Preservation or enhancement of the pedestrian environment by maintenance of pleasant scale and visual interest.
(3) While the above factors must be present to a considerable degree for any bulk limit to be exceeded, these factors must be present to a greater degree where both the maximum length and the maximum diagonal dimension are to be exceeded than where only one maximum dimension is to be exceeded.
(Amended by Ord. 414-85, App. 9/17/85; Ord. 298-08, File No. 081153, App. 12/19/2008; Ord. 188-15
, File No. 150871, App. 11/4/2015, Eff. 12/4/2015)
AMENDMENT HISTORY
(a) General. The bulk limits prescribed by Section 270 have been carefully considered in relation to objectives and policies for conservation and change in C-3 Districts. However, there may be some exceptional cases in which these limits may properly be permitted to be exceeded to a certain degree, provided, however, that there are adequate compensating factors. Exceptions to the bulk limits may be approved in the manner provided in Section 309, provided that at least one of the following criteria is met:
(1) Achievement of a distinctly better design, in both a public and a private sense, than would be possible with strict adherence to the bulk limits, avoiding an unnecessary prescription of building form while carrying out the intent of the bulk limits and the principles and policies of the Master Plan;
(2) Development of a building or structure with widespread public service benefits and significance to the community at large, where compelling functional requirements of the specific building or structure make necessary such a deviation; and provided further that all of the following criteria are met:
(A) The added bulk does not contribute significantly to shading of publicly accessible open space,
(B) The added bulk does not increase ground level wind currents in violation of the provisions of Section 148 of this Code;
(3) The added bulk does not significantly affect light and air to adjacent buildings;
(4) If appropriate to the massing of the building, the appearance of bulk in the building, structure or development is reduced to the extent feasible by means of at least one and preferably a combination of the following factors, so as to produce the impression of an aggregate of parts rather than a single building mass:
(A) Major variations in the planes of wall surfaces, in either depth or direction, that significantly alter the mass,
(B) Significant differences in the heights of various portions of the building, structure or development that divide the mass into distinct elements,
(C) Differences in materials, colors or scales of the facades that produce separate major elements,
(D) Compensation for those portions of the building, structure or development that may exceed the bulk limits by corresponding reduction of other portions below the maximum bulk permitted, and
(E) In cases where two or more buildings, structures or towers are contained within a single development, a wide separation between such buildings, structures or towers;
(5) The building, structure or development is made compatible with the character and development of the surrounding area by means of all of the following factors:
(A) A silhouette harmonious with natural land-forms and building patterns, including the patterns produced by height limits,
(B) Either maintenance of an overall height similar to that of surrounding development or a sensitive transition, where appropriate, to development of a dissimilar character,
(C) Use of materials, colors and scales either similar to or harmonizing with those of nearby development, and
(D) Preservation or enhancement of the pedestrian environment by maintenance of pleasant scale and visual interest.
(6) Exceptions to bulk limits shall not result in a building of greater total gross floor area than would be permitted if the bulk limits were met.
(Added by Ord. 414-85, App. 9/17/85; amended by Ord. 182-12
, File No. 120665, App. 8/8/2012, Eff. 9/7/2012)
AMENDMENT HISTORY
Formerly undesignated concluding paragraph designated as division (a)(6); Ord. 182-12
, Eff. 9/7/2012.
Loading...