Loading...
(a) Findings. Early care and education providers are essential for working families, but were struggling even before the COVID-19 health emergency and are now critically impacted. Due to new health orders issued in 2020, early care education providers had to limit the number of children served, increase staffing, and modify physical spaces in order to provide a safe environment. However, subsidies from State and Federal resources were limited and have to kept up1
with the rising costs of operation.
In July 2020, the Center for the Study of Child Care Employment conducted a survey of child care programs throughout California and found that 953 center-based (40%) and family child care (60%) programs were facing new financial challenges including decreased capacity and increased costs caused by the reopening process and meeting new COVID-19 mitigation protocols. Specifically, of the programs that have re-opened, 77% have experienced loss of income from families; 99% of re-opened child care centers and 78% of re-opened family child care programs have fewer children attending than before the pandemic.
Without public funding, the early care and education system is in severe financial crisis; the projected revenue loss for early care and education centers and family child care centers that are currently funded by the City were estimated to lose $21.8 million between March and June 30, 2020. The City’s Economic Recovery Task Force’s October 2020 report stated that a quality, robust child care system was necessary to get San Francisco back to work and onto the road of recovery. The Task Force recommended that the City establish new methods for supporting child care providers, including financial support with flexible supplemental grant funds or forgivable loans to expand spaces, open up larger spaces, and provide adequate spacing to adhere to new health requirements.
While San Francisco’s Office of Early Care and Education served over 7,000 children from 0-K with some form of subsidy-supported program this past quarter, there are currently 2,796 children actively on the waiting list for City-funded programs. Based on the 2018 citywide needs assessment, there are over 1,000 preschool-aged children and 19,000 infants and toddlers who we are unable to serve with our current licensed capacity.
Beyond the early care and education providers that receive some funding through the City, there are also hundreds of non-subsidized child care providers including co-ops, licensed nonprofit centers, licensed private child care centers, and licensed family-based child care that are at the brink of closure due to the pandemic. In order to support the entire early care and education system, there needs to be adequate support for early care and education providers across the spectrum to stabilize the workforce and sustain existing child care slots.
(b) Establishment of Early Education Economic Recovery Program. Subject to the budgetary and fiscal provisions of the Charter, the Office of Early Care and Education (“OECE”) shall develop and implement the Early Education Economic Recovery Program (“Program”) to provide grants and no-interest loans to early care and education providers impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, as provided in this Section 20.17-4. The Program shall be funded under the Early Care and Education for All Initiative by appropriations from the Babies and Families First Fund established in Administrative Code Section 10.100-36, in addition to such other appropriations as the Board of Supervisors may direct by ordinance.
(c) Providers Eligible for Funding. The following types of early care and education providers (“Providers”) shall be eligible to receive funding under the Program, subject to additional criteria established by OECE, provided that the Providers are operating in the City at the time of the grant or loan award and throughout the period covered by the loan or grant:
(1) Small and Large Family Child Care Homes, as defined in 22 C.C.R. Section 102352(f)(1), that (A) are licensed under California Health and Safety Code Sections 1596.60 et seq. at the time of the grant or loan award and throughout the period covered by the grant or loan, and (B) served at least four children between ages zero and six, inclusive, at any point from March 1, 2019 through February 29, 2020;
(2) Non-profit Day Care Centers or Child Care Centers, as defined under 22 C.C.R. Section 101152(c)(7), that, at the time of grant or loan award and throughout the period covered by the grant or loan, (A) are licensed under California Health and Safety Code Sections 1596.60 et seq., and (B) care for children between ages zero and six, inclusive;
(3) For-profit Day Care Centers or Child Care Centers, as defined under 22 C.C.R. Section 101152(c)(7), that, at the time of grant or loan award and throughout the period covered by the grant or loan, (A) are licensed under California Health and Safety Code Sections 1596.60 et seq., (B) operate no more than two locations in the City, and (C) care for children between ages zero and six, inclusive; and
(4) Providers licensed and exempt from licensing under California Health and Safety Code Sections 1596.60 et seq. that, at the time of grant or loan award and throughout the period covered by the grant or loan, (A) operate under a cooperative arrangement between parents for the care of their children, in which families participate on a rotating basis, serving six or more families, (B) meet the description in California Health and Safety Code Section 1596.792(e), and (C) care for children between ages zero and six, inclusive.
(d) Permitted Uses of Funding. OECE may provide funds to Providers under the Program for the following purposes:
(1) Costs associated with cleaning or sanitation of Providers’ facilities to minimize the risk of transmission of COVID-19;
(2) Costs of purchasing educational materials, including computers and other electronic devices, to reduce the need for children to share materials during the COVID-19 pandemic;
(3) Costs associated with increasing the size of facilities, changing the arrangement of furniture in facilities, or otherwise making physical changes to facilities, to help keep children physically distanced from one another to minimize the risk of transmission of COVID-19;
(4) Costs of providing financial assistance to the Providers’ employees to assist those employees to pay for childcare for their own dependents during working hours;
(5) Costs of providing childcare for free or reduced cost to children of essential healthcare workers and City employees who have been activated as Disaster Service Workers, who are unable to care for their children during the workday; and
(6) Other costs authorized by OECE by rule or regulation that assist Providers to address the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on Providers, their employees, children served by Providers, and families of those children.
(e) Administration. OECE shall administer the Program with assistance as needed from the Human Services Agency, and may promulgate rules or regulations regarding the Program. At minimum, OECE shall promulgate rules and regulations to:
(1) Establish an application process, a selection process, and selection criteria for the Program. In promulgating regulations establishing a selection process and criteria, OECE shall attempt to establish criteria that maximize the likelihood that the Program will be accessible to Providers that do not currently receive funding from the City.
(2) Establish a set of factors OECE may consider in determining the amount of funding in each grant or loan, provided that each grant or loan issued under the Program shall be at least $5,000.
(f) Outreach. Beginning no later than 10 days after the effective date of the ordinance in Board File No. 201327 enacting this Section 20.17-4, OECE shall develop and begin to implement an outreach plan to make Providers aware of the Program. OECE shall design the outreach plan to reach all Providers in the City, including those that do not currently receive funding from the City. In designing and implementing the outreach program, OECE shall work directly with child care resource and referral organizations and family child care associations to maximize the impact of the outreach in appropriate languages.
(g) Statement of Intent for Funding in FY 2020-21. Subject to the budgetary and fiscal provisions of the Charter and availability of funds in the Babies and Families First Fund in Section 10.100-36, it is the intent of the Board of Supervisors that OECE will award grants or loans in Fiscal Year 2020-21 in a total amount of at least $20 million.
(h) No-Interest Loan Program. This Section 20.17-4 authorizes the City to provide interest-free loans under the Program. Before conducting outreach regarding interest-free loans or initiating a solicitation process for such loans, OECE shall consult with the Treasurer-Tax Collector and the Controller. Based on that consultation, OECE may determine that an interest-free loan program is infeasible or otherwise would be impractical or problematic, and may decide not to award loans under the Program.
(i) Sunset. This Section 20.17-4 shall sunset on December 31, 2021 unless the Board of Supervisors extends it by ordinance. After that date, OECE shall issue no additional grants or loans under the Program, but rules, restrictions, and reimbursement periods that apply to existing grants and loans shall remain in effect. After the sunset date, the City Attorney shall cause this Section to be removed from the Administrative Code.
(Added by Ord. 272-20, File No. 201327, App. 12/23/2020, Eff. 1/23/2021)
CODIFICATION NOTE
1. So in Ord. 272-20.
Findings and Purpose. | |
Definitions. | |
Establishment of Shelter Grievance Policy and Administration. | |
Notice Procedures. | |
Shelter Hearing Procedures. | |
Arbitration Procedures. | |
Good Cause. | |
Reporting and Annual Review. | |
Complaint Procedure. | |
Severability. | |
General Welfare. | |
(a) Findings.
(1) As of the San Francisco Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing’s 2019 “Point in Time” Count measuring the prevalence of homelessness, there were approximately 8,035 unhoused individuals in San Francisco. To combat homelessness and assist these individuals, San Francisco has developed a portfolio of shelters ranging from traditional models to more recent innovations like navigation centers and safe sleep sites. Each shelter establishes rules governing shelter client conduct and, if a shelter client breaks a rule, the shelter can either issue a warning and impose a non-immediate denial of service, or impose an immediate denial of service. If a client is denied service, this may result in an unhoused individual losing the individual’s place in the shelter, often exiting back to the street.
(2) To prevent unnecessary exits to the street, and to define the rights of shelter clients, the Human Services Commission adopted the Shelter Grievance Policy on April 23, 1992, and, since August 25, 2016, the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing has administered this policy. The policy consists of a two-stage appeals process that allows shelter clients to dispute their denials of service. These appeals often result in an agreement between the shelter and client—remedying the underlying denial of service, allowing the client to remain in the shelter, and reducing the likelihood of a repeat rule violation.
(3) The Shelter Grievance Policy helps keep the City’s unhoused individuals in shelters and off the streets, while also providing a dispute resolution process for clients accused of violating shelter rules. Although this Shelter Grievance Policy has been incredibly successful in accomplishing both goals for three decades, the policy itself has not been codified in the Municipal Code.
(4) Ensuring each shelter that receives City funding has a transparent set of rules and rights for their clients, including the right to a fair and speedy appeals process, creates accountability and increases the quality of the shelter system.
(b) Purpose. The purpose of this Article XVIII is to codify the Shelter Grievance Policy with appropriate revisions and establish transparent standards by which shelter clients may appeal a denial of service.
(Added by Ord. 69-22, File No. 220090, App. 4/28/2022, Eff. 5/29/2022)
For purposes of this Article XVIII:
“Arbitration” means a hearing conducted by an arbitrator adjudicating a Shelter Hearing decision that was unfavorable to a Client.
“City” means the City and County of San Francisco.
“Client” means an individual receiving Services from a Shelter.
“Denial of Service” means either an Immediate Denial of Service or a Non-Immediate Denial of Service. A Denial of Service includes denials issued for a Client’s failure to meet shelter eligibility criteria.
“Denial of Service Notice” means a notice issued by a Shelter to a Client that the Shelter intends to deny Service to the Client.
“Department” means the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing.
“Director” means the Director of the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing or the Director’s designee.
“Immediate Denial of Service” means a denial of Service due to a Rule violation that threatens the health or safety of Shelter staff or Clients and results in the Shelter immediately removing the Client from the Shelter.
“Non-Immediate Denial of Service” means a denial of Service due to a Rule violation that does not threaten the health or safety of Shelter staff or Clients.
“Rule” means a regulation governing Client behavior established by a Shelter.
“Service” means temporary shelter services offered by a Shelter.
“Shelter” means a facility, outdoor location, or resource center, funded in whole or in part by the City, providing temporary shelter services for homeless single adults, youth, or families. “Shelter” shall not include domestic violence shelters; adult probation transitional housing; and Single Room Occupancy (SRO) hotels that are not operated by the City as temporary accommodations for emergency housing.
“Shelter Client Advocate” means any individual, group, or organization that provides advocacy or representation services for Clients.
“Shelter Grievance Policy” means the policy established by this Article XVIII governing grievance procedures and appeals for Clients.
“Shelter Hearing” means a hearing conducted by a Shelter to adjudicate a Denial of Service.
“Warning Notice” means a notice issued by a Shelter to a Client due to a Rule violation that does not threaten the health or safety of Shelter staff or Clients.
(Added by Ord. 69-22, File No. 220090, App. 4/28/2022, Eff. 5/29/2022)
The Department shall administer the Shelter Grievance Policy. The Director shall establish regulations for the proper administration of the Shelter Grievance Policy consistent with this Article XVIII. The Shelter Grievance Advisory Committee shall advise the Department and the Director on administration of the Shelter Grievance Policy and the regulations promulgated thereunder. Whenever any discretion as to the exercise of authority is given to the Director by this Article or by a regulation, the Director shall exercise said discretion only in so far as the same is necessary to protect the health or safety of the Clients, the Shelter and its employees, or the public, or to promote the reasonable, humane, and efficient operation of the Shelter. The Shelter Grievance Policy and any regulations promulgated pursuant to the Shelter Grievance Policy shall apply to the Shelter operations of all City departments that fund or contract with Shelters. All contracts between the City and Shelters shall include a provision that requires each Shelter to adhere to the Shelter Grievance Policy.
(Added by Ord. 69-22, File No. 220090, App. 4/28/2022, Eff. 5/29/2022)
Loading...