Loading...
(a) Every Extended-Hours Premises shall have a Security Plan, as defined in Section 1070(o), that has been approved by the Entertainment Commission or by the Director, as required by this Article.
(b) As of the effective date of this Section, the Entertainment Commission shall not approve any permit or other application relating to a Business unless the applicant has a Security Plan that has been approved by the Commission or the Director as provided in this Article. The Security Plan shall meet the minimum requirements of Section 1070(o) and any implementing rules and regulations. The Commission shall disapprove any Security Plan that it determines does not adequately address the safety of persons and property and provide for the orderly dispersal of persons and traffic, notwithstanding the compliance of the proposed plan with the minimum requirements of Section 1070(o).
(c) Compliance with the Security Plan approved under this Article is a condition of the permit.
(d) Every Extended-Hours Premises that does not have a Security Plan approved by the Entertainment Commission on the effective date of this Section shall submit a proposed Security Plan to the Director. The Entertainment Commission, the Director and every Permittee shall follow the procedures and standards set forth in Section 1060.31 of this Code for the approval of Security Plans under this Article. The Entertainment Commission may suspend a permit for the Permittee's failure to comply with the requirements of Section 1060.31 as required by this Subsection (d), including the failure to submit a proposed Security Plan and the failure to comply with an approved Security Plan.
(e) For the purpose of calculating compliance with the component of a Security Plan that requires a ratio of one Security Guard to a specific number of individuals, a Security Guard may be counted toward the ratio for only one Place of Entertainment at any one time. This calculation rule applies whether the required ratio of Security Guard to individuals is based solely on the definition of Security Plan in Section 1060, is otherwise required by this Article, or is a condition of the Place of Entertainment permit.
(f) Where the Chief of Police or the Chief's designee, with the concurrence of the Director, determines that the public safety will not be advanced by enforcing on a particular Business with an Extended Hours Premises Permit the requirement stated in Section 1070(o) that on Thursday and Sunday evenings there be a Security Guard for every 100 individuals authorized by the Occupancy Permit, the Chief or Chief's designee or the Director may notify the Permittee in writing that the Security Guard ratio based on Occupancy Permit shall not be required for that Business on Thursday and/or Sunday evenings. Such a determination may be based on all relevant factors, including but not limited to the past operation of the Business or related Businesses, but may not be based on the content of constitutionally protected expression or entertainment. Such a determination creates no vested right on the part of the affected Business to an exemption from the Thursday/Sunday requirement of one Security Guard per 100 individuals authorized by the Occupancy Permit, and said determination may be changed at any time by the Chief of Police or the Chief's designee, or by the Director, upon written notice to the Permittee. For purposes of this Subsection (f), the Captain for the district where the Business is located, or the Captain's designee, is deemed the Chief's designee unless the Chief of Police directs otherwise.
(Added by Ord. 238-09, File No. 080324, App. 11/20/2009; amended by Ord. 163-17, File No. 170443, App. 7/27/2017, Eff. 8/26/2017)
Notwithstanding a Security Plan's compliance with the minimum requirements of Section 1070(o) and prior approvals under this Article, after consulting with the San Francisco Police Department, the Director may issue an order directing a Permittee to comply with a revised Security Plan by directing such revisions as the Director reasonably determines will address safety and traffic concerns. The procedures and standards set forth in Section 1060.32 of this Code shall govern the issuance of orders directing a Permittee to comply with a revised Security Plan under this Article. The Entertainment Commission may suspend a permit for the Permittee's failure to comply with the requirements of Section 1060.32 as required by this Section.
(Added by Ord. 238-09, File No. 080324, App. 11/20/2009)
No Permittee shall operate a Business in any manner inconsistent with any condition imposed on the permit. A Permittee may request an amendment to a permit to remove or change a condition by filing a request with the Secretary of the Commission and paying the fee for an Amendment to a Permit required under Police Code Section 2.26. The Entertainment Commission shall conduct a hearing and determine whether to approve the application to amend the permit according to the procedures and standards governing the initial application for Extended-Hours Premises Permits.
(Added by Ord. 238-09, File No. 080324, App. 11/20/2009)
(a) Every Permittee shall provide written notice to the Entertainment Commission within 30 days after any of the following occurs:
(1) Criminal charges, complaints or indictments for the Permittee, the Manager, and each Person with authority or control over the Business occurring after the filing of the permit application to the extent that they fall within the categories specified in Sections 1060.3(j), (k) and (l) of this Code as incorporated by Section 1070.3.
(b) Every Person holding a Extended-Hours Premises Permit, other than a publicly traded corporation, shall maintain a record of the name and address of every Person that directly or indirectly owns or controls 10% or more of the assets, ownership interests or voting interests in the Person holding the Permit, which shall be known as a "record of principal owners," and shall make the information available to the Entertainment Commission upon request. Every Person subject to this Subsection (b) shall report any change to the record of principal owners within 30 days of the transaction that effects the change. A "publicly traded" corporation is a company that has issued securities through an initial public offering which are traded on at least one stock exchange or over-the-counter market.
(Added by Ord. 238-09, File No. 080324, App. 11/20/2009)
(a) The following actions taken under this Article may be appealed to the Board of Appeals: The granting or denial of a permit, including a conditionally granted permit, or an amendment to a permit; the suspension or revocation of a permit; and the denial by the Entertainment Commission of an exception from the regulations under Section 1070.19. Any such appeal shall be filed within ten days from the date of the decision, as provided in Section 8 of the San Francisco Business and Tax Regulations Code.
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection (a) of this Section, the Permittee or permit applicant may seek immediate judicial review of the actions described in Subsection (a) of this Section pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1085 or Section 1094.8, as these provisions may be amended, including any successor provisions, or any other procedure provided by law. The Permittee or permit applicant is not required to exhaust his or her administrative remedies before the Entertainment Commission or before the Board of Appeals.
(Added by Ord. 238-09, File No. 080324, App. 11/20/2009)
Nothing in this Article is intended to restrict or alter in any way the authority vested in the San Francisco Police Department under Federal, State or local law to take action in response to conduct that arises in connection with the operation of a Business.
(Added by Ord. 238-09, File No. 080324, App. 11/20/2009)
In undertaking the enforcement of this Article, the City is assuming an undertaking only to promote the general welfare. It is not assuming, nor is it imposing on its officers and employees, an obligation for breach of which it is liable in money damages to any person who claims that such breach proximately caused injury.
(Added by Ord. 238-09, File No. 080324, App. 11/20/2009)
Loading...