Loading...
(a) All work performed on a Major Construction Project, as defined in Environment Code Section 2503, shall be carried out in compliance with the Clean Construction requirements of Environment Code Chapter 25. The Department Head or officer calling for Bids for contracts for work to be performed on a Major Construction Project shall specify in the Advertisement for Bids that Clean Construction is required for the performance of all work unless a waiver of all or part of the requirements of that Chapter has been granted under Sections 2505 or 2507.
(b) Every Contract for work to be performed on a Major Construction Project shall contain provisions, in a form to be approved by the City Attorney: (A) requiring that the Contractor comply with Chapter 25 of the Environment Code, (B) authorizing waivers as set forth in Environment Code Sections 2505 and 2507, and (C) specifying liquidated damages in the amount of $100 per day per each piece of off-road equipment and each off-road engine utilized to complete work on the project in violation of Environment Code Chapter 25.
(a) Each Department Head or Director authorized to enter into Contracts for Public Works or Improvements under Article IV of this Chapter 6 shall document, evaluate, and report the performance of all Contractors awarded construction Contracts under this Chapter 6.
(b) The awarding departments shall work with the Office of the Controller to create and maintain a database to collect the Contractor performance evaluations.
(c) This Section 6.26 shall become operative on March 31, 2017 and shall apply to all Contracts first advertised or initiated on or after this date.
(d) Within one year of the effective date of this Section 6.26, the Department Heads referenced in subsection (a) shall submit to the Board of Supervisors a report that describes the departments' implementation of this contractor performance evaluation program and database. The report shall include each department's outreach with different stakeholders including the Contract Monitoring Division. Concurrent with the report, the Department Heads shall submit to the Board of Supervisors a proposed resolution to accept the report.
(a) Short Title. This Section 6.27 shall be known and may be cited as the Citywide Project Labor Agreement Ordinance.
(b) Findings and Purpose.
(1) Certain public work and improvement projects can involve numerous contractors and employees in different trades, have critical timelines for completion, and require a skilled and properly-trained workforce to successfully complete the work in a proper and timely manner. To avoid costly delays and additional expense to the City, it is essential that construction on such projects proceed without the labor disruptions that can occur on long-term projects, both from external labor relations problems and from the frictions that often arise when a large number of contractors and their employees and subcontractors work in proximity to one another on a job site.
(2) Additionally, in a complex and highly developed urban environment such as San Francisco, many smaller projects can be of substantial importance to City residents, whether through provision of basic services or through the establishment or maintenance of conditions for economic, physical, or emotional well-being, such that it is highly desirable and even essential to avoid the delay in their completion that might result from labor disruptions.
(3) In the private sector, project labor agreements have been used for many years on numerous construction projects to achieve satisfactory performance and the economic benefits that result from having a guaranteed source of skilled workers and from avoiding work disruptions.
(4) In San Francisco, project labor agreements have been and are being used successfully by public entities including the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, the San Francisco Community College District, the San Francisco Unified School District, the Transbay Joint Powers Authority, and the United States General Services Administration, as well as by many private entities, for construction in both large and small scale projects, including hospitals, reservoirs, water treatment and transmission facilities, schools, offices, and residences, and for the retrofit and remodel of existing buildings and facilities. Such agreements have been a major factor in producing quality construction work and projects completed on time, within budget, without labor strife or disruptions.
(5) Beyond San Francisco, throughout the Bay Area and Northern California, project labor agreements have been used successfully on numerous public and private construction projects, and public entities such as the County of Contra Costa, the Bay Area Rapid Transit District, the Oakland Unified School District, the City of Berkeley, and others, maintain Project Labor Agreement Ordinances and Policies requiring the use of project labor agreements on their publicly funded construction projects. The same is true of the San Francisco International Airport, a City entity located in the County of San Mateo.
(6) The cyclical nature of our economy has led and will lead to high levels of unemployment and underemployment of San Francisco residents, particularly in certain neighborhoods and communities. Statistics also indicate that high levels of unemployment or underemployment correlate to a higher number of families living at or near the poverty line. As a result, it is the policy of the City to increase and improve the employment of persons living in San Francisco in an attempt to counteract the grave economic ills associated with the unemployment and underemployment levels that have existed and will exist within San Francisco.
(7) There is a need to provide San Francisco residents with more opportunities to participate in workforce development and pre-apprenticeship programs that include life skills training and job readiness training. To this end, the City has funded the CityBuild Academy established by the Office of Economic and Workforce Development and has funded and may in the future fund additional programs such as the Mario DeLaTorre Academy. Such pre-apprenticeship programs increase the capacity of San Francisco residents to succeed later in formal apprenticeship programs and hence reduce unemployment and underemployment and accompanying poverty and economic conditions.
(8) The construction crafts that work on City-funded projects require a supply of new apprentices to perpetuate the crafts into the future. Through their apprenticeships, these crafts provide genuine opportunities for long-term, well-paid careers in the construction industry. Entry into and employment through these apprenticeships can be facilitated by formal understandings between the City and the labor organizations affiliated with the San Francisco Building and Construction Trades Council.
(9) In addition, large numbers of returning veterans will be seeking employment on City-funded construction projects and training opportunities for entrance into the construction industry. Such training opportunities are available through a program known as “Helmets to Hardhats,” a program that current City project labor agreements require contractors and subcontractors to use.
(10) In addition, economic exclusion and the City’s housing crisis have led and will continue to lead to significant displacement and out-migration of San Francisco residents, particularly from historically African-American neighborhoods, which have suffered steady and disproportionate population decline since 1970. There is a need to provide economic opportunities to enable such displaced residents to return to San Francisco.
(11) The use of project labor agreements has proven to be a valuable vehicle for accomplishing all of the goals set out above.
“Core Employee” means an employee of a Contractor who has not previously had a relationship with the Unions who demonstrates the following qualifications: (1) possesses any license required by state or federal law for the Project work to be performed; (2) has worked a total of at least 1,000 hours in the construction craft during the prior three years; (3) has been on the Contractor’s active payroll for at least 500 hours during a time period to be determined in the Project Labor Agreement; and (4) has the ability to perform safely the basic functions of the applicable trade.
“Cost” means the amount of money the Department Head estimates the City will spend on construction work. “Cost” does not include money the Department Head projects the City will spend on City employees, project managers, program managers, construction managers, and design teams (including, but not limited to, architects and engineers, or any other consultant employed by a City Department and their respective sub-consultants, and other employees of professional service organizations, unless performing craft work).
“Covered Project” means a project performed under a Contract involving Public Work or Improvement as those terms are defined in Administrative Code Section 6.1, if either: (1) the Contract is funded in whole or in part by a General Obligation Bond or Revenue Bond and the Department Head estimates the Cost of the Contract to exceed the following threshold amounts: $5,000,000 for Covered Projects where the Advertisement for Bid is released in the first year after the City and Unions sign a Project Labor Agreement, $3,000,000 for Covered Projects where the Advertisement for Bid is released in the second year after the City and Unions sign a Project Labor Agreement, and $1,000,000 thereafter, or (2) the project is funded by a source other than a General Obligation Bond or Revenue Bond and the Department Head estimates the Cost of the Covered Project to exceed $10,000,000, or (3) the Department Head has determined that delay in completing the Covered Project may lead to interruption or delay of services or use of facilities that are important to the essential operations or infrastructure of the City. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, “Covered Project” does not include any Public Work or Improvement projects undertaken by the San Francisco International Airport, the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, the Port of San Francisco, or the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency. “Covered Project” also does not include any Public Work or Improvement project where application of the citywide PLA would violate the conditions of a state, federal, or other public funding source.
“Project Labor Agreement” or “PLA” means a multi-craft collective bargaining agreement between the City and the San Francisco Building and Construction Trades Council and affiliated labor unions that will refer workers to Covered Projects, and which governs the construction services on the Covered Project.
“Subcontractor” means any person, firm, partnership, owner-operator, limited liability company, corporation, joint venture, proprietorship, trust, association, or other entity providing services to a Contractor or other Subcontractor in fulfillment of the Contractor’s or other Subcontractor’s obligations arising from a contract with the City for construction work on a Covered Project.
“Unions” means the San Francisco Building and Construction Trades Council and its affiliated local unions. These affiliated local unions are listed in a document that is on file in Board of Supervisors File No. 181043 and incorporated by reference as if set forth herein, and the City Administrator and San Francisco Building and Construction Trades Council may update the list by mutual agreement at any time. Nothing in this Section 6.27 is intended to imply that the City has the authority to approve local unions may affiliate with the San Francisco Building and Construction Trades Council.1
(d) Project Labor Agreement Requirement. Not later than September 1, 2019, the City Administrator shall negotiate with the Unions and sign on behalf of the City, a citywide Project Labor Agreement that shall apply to all Covered Projects. In the City Administrator’s discretion, the City Administrator may extend this deadline once for up to three months, to no later than December 1, 2019, by providing written notice to the Unions, the Mayor, and the Board of Supervisors. For all Covered Projects advertised after the City Administrator signs the PLA on behalf of the City, each Department Head shall set as a precondition to the award of the contract that the Contractor and its Subcontractors sign an agreement to be bound by the citywide Project Labor Agreement. The Contractor shall execute the Project Labor Agreement on file with the City Administrator. Nothing in this provision shall impact or otherwise impair the terms of any existing Project Labor Agreement. The City is not bound by the requirements of subsection (e) unless and until the City and all Unions have executed a final Project Labor Agreement.
(e) Required Terms for citywide Project Labor Agreement. The citywide Project Labor Agreement shall include the following terms:
(1) The Project Labor Agreement is binding on all Contractors and Subcontractors at all tiers of a Covered Project, except as provided in subsection (e)(10);
(2) Unions, Contractors, and Subcontrac- tors are bound by the requirements of Administrative Code Chapters 6, 14B, 82 and 83 and Labor and Employment Code , as they may be amended from time to time, including but not limited to the provisions addressing Local Hire and Local Business Enterprise;
(3) Contractors will condition the engagement of each Subcontractor on the Subcontractor agreeing to be bound by and comply with all the terms of the Project Labor Agreement, unless the Subcontractor is a Local Business Enterprise that has not received over $5,000,000 for work on Covered Projects cumulatively over the entire duration of the PLA;
(4) Contractors and Subcontractors to whom construction services are awarded for a Covered Project will use the hiring halls operated by signatory Unions for all labor on the Covered Project except for (A) the services provided by non-craft managerial, executive, and clerical employees, (B) supervisory employees above the level of general foreman; (C) at least two Core Employees per Covered Project, as further determined in Project Labor Agreement negotiations, or (D) LBEs that meet the requirements set forth in subsection (e)(10)
(5) Contractors and Subcontractors will hire apprentices indentured in the State-approved joint apprenticeship program for the applicable craft or trade for work on the Covered Project in accordance with the apprentice ratios contained in California Labor Code Section 1777.5, as it may be amended from time to time;
(6) Unions will use the “Helmets to Hardhats” Program to assist returning veterans in obtaining employment and training opportunities on the project;
(7) Within three years of the City Administrator executing the PLA on behalf of the City, all of the Unions shall enter into agreements, or modify existing agreements, with CityBuild Academy to ensure graduates of CityBuild Academy have a pathway for direct entry into the Union’s apprenticeship program;
(8) a single jurisdictional dispute resolution process for resolving all disputes between Unions, as adopted by the North America’s Building Trades Unions, or any subsequent plan or dispute resolution procedure that the North America’s Building Trades Unions may adopt thereafter;
(9) an agreement by all Unions to refrain from strikes, picketing, and other labor disruptions related to the Covered Project, and that Union members will continue work on a Covered Project despite the expiration of any applicable collective bargaining agreement;
(10) the PLA does not apply to Contractors performing work on Covered Projects that are certified as Local Business Enterprises (LBEs) under Administrative Code Chapter 14B.3, until the LBE has received the value of contracts awarded for work on Covered Projects in an amount exceeding $5,000,000 cumulatively over the entire duration of the PLA;
(11) the PLA’s coverage does not extend to the Contractors’ or Subcontractors’ parent companies, subsidiaries, or affiliates except to the extent those entities are performing work on a Covered Project;
(12) the PLA does not apply to any work performed on or near or leading to or into the Covered Project site by federal, state, local, or other governmental entities or their contractors or subcontractors, or by utilities or their contractors or subcontractors, or by the City or its contractors or subcontractors if that work that is not part of the Covered Project; and
(13) a prohibition against discrimination on any and all bases that City, state or federal law prohibits.
(f) Annual Reporting. Beginning on the effective date of the ordinance in Board File No. 181043 enacting this Section 6.27, the Office of the Controller shall, in collaboration with the Contract Monitoring Division, collect utilization rates for LBEs on current Contracts covered by this Section 6.27. Within one year after the City Administrator executes the PLA on behalf of the City, and annually thereafter, the Controller shall conduct annual reviews of the PLA to evaluate whether the PLA has promoted the efficient, economical, and timely completion of Covered Projects, the costs of Covered Projects, and the PLA’s impact on LBEs and the local workforce.
(g) No later than July 31, 2023, the Controller shall submit to the Clerk of the Board and all members of the Board of Supervisors a request for a public hearing regarding the annual reports described in subsection (f).
(h) The Project Labor Agreement shall automatically expire 20 years from the date it is initially signed by the City and the Unions, at which point the City and Unions shall no longer be bound by the citywide Project Labor Agreement, except on Covered Projects for which contracts are awarded before expiration of the Project Labor Agreement.
(i) Severability. If any subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Section 6.27, or any application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions or applications of the Section. The Board of Supervisors hereby declares that it would have passed this Section and each and every subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, and word not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any other portion of this Section or application thereof would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.
(j) No Conflict with Federal or State Law. Nothing in this Section 6.27 shall be interpreted or applied so as to create any requirement, power, or duty in conflict with any federal or state law.
(Added by Ord. 1-19, File No. 181043, App. 1/18/2019, Eff. 2/18/2019)
CODIFICATION NOTE
1. So in Ord. 1-19.
Competitive Procurement of Professional Services for Public Work Projects. | |
Requests for Competitive Proposals or Qualifications. | |
Professional Services Contract Terms. | |
As-needed Professional Services Contracts. |
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Administrative Code, when a department is seeking outside temporary professional design, consultant, or Construction Management services for a Public Work or Improvement project, where the fee for such services shall exceed the Minimum Competitive Amount, as defined below, the department shall procure such services through a competitive process based primarily on qualifications.
(a) Minimum Competitive Amount. The Minimum Competitive Amount for temporary outside professional service Contracts shall be $200,000. For every five-year period starting with January 1, 2020-December 31, 2024, the Controller shall recalculate the Minimum Competitive Amount to reflect any proportional increase in the Urban Regional Consumer Price Index from January 1, 2020, rounded to the nearest $10,000. The Minimum Competitive Amount as recalculated by the Controller shall take effect by operation of law on January 1 of the first year of the next five-year period (thus, for example, on January 1, 2025 following the five-year period ending December 31, 2024).
(b) Selection Process. For professional services Contracts in excess of the Minimum Competitive Amount, the Department Head shall designate one or more panels to review proposals and rate respondents with respect to a request for proposals or qualifications for a professional services Contract. A panel shall consist of not fewer than two persons. The Department Head may establish a multi-tier selection process whereby, for example, a technical panel recommends a shortlist of qualified respondents and a second panel ranks the shortlist.
The Department Head shall ensure that all panel members are impartial and that all respondents are treated fairly. The panel members rating the respondents shall do so according to their independent assessment of the respondent's qualifications for the Public Work project; questions relating to a respondent's expertise, qualifications and experience shall remain within the sole purview of the panel members.
(c) Negotiation. Following the selection process outlined above, and should the department concerned desire to enter into a Contract, the Department Head shall invite the highest-ranked qualified respondent to negotiate a Contract to the extent provided for in the request for proposals. In the event that the Department Head determines, in the Department Head's sole discretion, that negotiations are unfruitful, the Department Head shall terminate negotiations in writing and may then invite the next highest-ranked respondent to negotiate a Contract. In such event, the Department Head shall as soon as practicable make a report to the Mayor, board or commission as appropriate to the department.
(d) Procedure Upon Rejection or Failure of Proposals. If no Responsive proposals are received from qualified proposers, the Department Head shall determine (1) whether further outreach efforts would result in respondents submitting proposals and/or (2) whether removal or modification of certain requirements in the Contract or request for proposals or qualifications would result in respondents submitting responsive proposals, provided that such requirements are not required by law and their removal or modification would not compromise the interests of the City. If the Department Head determines that steps (1) and/or (2), above, would likely result in respondents submitting Responsive proposals, then the Department Head shall reissue the request for proposals or qualifications. If the Department Head determines that neither step (1) nor (2) above, would likely result in respondents submitting Responsive proposals, then the Department Head, with the approval of the Mayor or the board or commission concerned, as appropriate, may negotiate with any qualified Contractor for the professional services sought by the request for proposals or qualifications.
(e) Procedure Upon Contractor's Failure to Deliver. When a Contractor fails to deliver a service of the quality, in the quantity, or in the manner specified in the Contract within the time specified in the Contract, the department may terminate the Contract and/or procure such service from any source. The department's authority to procure services from other sources as specified in this subsection 6.40(e) shall not preclude the City's exercise of any other remedies, including termination of the Contract.
(Amended by Ord. 324-00, File No. 001919, App. 12/28/2000; Ord. 7-02, File No. 011675, App. 1/25/2002; Ord. 19-10, File No. 091163, App. 2/10/2010; Ord. 108-15, File No. 150175, App. 7/2/2015, Eff. 8/1/2015; Ord. 220-20, File No. 200949, App. 11/6/2020, Eff. 12/7/2020; Ord. 203-21, File No. 210835, App. 11/12/2021, Eff. 12/13/2021, Oper. 7/1/2022)
All requests for competitive proposals or qualifications for temporary design, consultant, or Construction Management services shall conform to and at a minimum require the following:
(a) Evaluation Criteria. The Department Head shall determine the criteria by which the design, consultant, or Construction Management service professionals shall be evaluated, on a project-by-project basis. Such criteria shall be included as a part of any request for proposals or qualifications. The criteria shall be based primarily on qualifications and experience relevant to the services needed for the project. Except as prohibited by law, the Department Head, in his or her sole discretion, may determine that, in the best interests of the City, a consultant who participated in the master plan, conceptual phase or other preliminary work for a project, may compete to provide professional services in future phases of such project. In such event, the consultant may not use, nor may the selection panel consider, the consultant's prior work on the project to establish its experience or qualifications in the competitive process.
(b) Reservation of Rights to Reject or Cancel the Request for Proposals in Whole or Part. The Department Head, upon approval of the Mayor or the board or commission, as appropriate, may reject any or all proposals, in whole or in part, received in response to a request for proposals or qualifications. The right to reject shall be reserved in any request for proposals or qualifications, but the failure to include such reservation shall not abrogate the rights of the Department Head under this Section 6.41 or give rise to any right by any respondent.
(c) Award and Certification Required. All requests for proposals or qualifications shall contain the following language [wording in brackets should be chosen as appropriate to the department]:
In accordance with San Francisco Administrative Code Chapter 6, no proposal is accepted and no contract in excess of [the Threshold Amount] is awarded by the City until such time as [(1) for departments with boards or commissions, (a) the Department Head recommends the contract for award and (b) the board or commission then adopts a resolution awarding the contract; or [(2) for departments under the Mayor, (a) the Mayor approves the contract for award and (b) the Department Head then issues and order of award]. Pursuant to Charter Section 3.105, all contract awards are subject to certification by the Controller as to the availability of funds.
Failure of a department to include such language in a request for proposals or qualifications does not give rise to a contract right by a respondent or Contractor outside of the requirements of the Charter or Administrative Code.
All Contracts for temporary design, consultant, and Construction Management services are professional services Contracts, which shall contain the following minimum terms and conditions:
(a) Guaranteed Maximum Costs. Professional service Contracts shall provide for a Guaranteed Maximum Cost, including fees, travel and related expenses as necessitated by the project. Any modification to the Guaranteed Maximum Cost must be approved by the Department Head in writing and approved by the Mayor or the board or commission concerned, as appropriate, and the Controller.
(b) Insurance. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Chapter 6, all professional service Contracts must conform to the insurance requirements established by the Risk Manager. The Risk Manager shall develop uniform insurance requirements for City Contracts subject to this Chapter 6. The Risk Manager shall review and update such insurance requirements as necessary to protect the City’s interests.
(c) Indemnification. All professional services Contracts awarded under this Chapter 6 shall require that the Contractor fully indemnify the City to the maximum extent provided by law, such that each Contractor must save, keep, bear harmless and fully indemnify the City and any of its officers or agents from any and all liability, damages, claims, judgments or demands for damages, costs or expenses in law or equity that may at any time arise.
This indemnification requirement may not be waived or abrogated in any way for any Contract without the recommendation of the Risk Manager and the express permission and approval of the Board of Supervisors.
(d) Assignment. No Contract shall be assigned except upon the recommendation of the Department Head concerned and with the approval of the Mayor, relative to the department under the Mayor's jurisdiction or the approval of the board or commission concerned for departments not under the Mayor.
(e) Modifications. Professional service Contracts may be modified only by written instrument, granted and approved by the City and in the same manner the underlying Contract was awarded.
(f) Contractor Prompt Payment. All professional services Contracts under this Chapter 6 shall require the Contractor to pay its subcontractors within seven calendar days after receipt of each progress payment from the City, unless otherwise agreed to in writing in advance by both Contractor and subcontractor. In the event that there is a good faith dispute over all or any portion of the amount due on a progress payment from a Contractor to a subcontractor, the Contractor may withhold the disputed amount but shall pay the undisputed amount.
Any Contractor who violates this subsection 6.42(f) shall pay to the subcontractor a penalty of 2% of the amount due per month for every month or portion thereof that payment is not made. This subsection 6.42(f) is enforceable in a court of competent jurisdiction, and is not intended to create a private right of action against the City.
(Added by Ord. 286-99, File No. 991645, App. 11/5/99; amended by Ord. 7-02, File No. 011675, App. 1/25/2002; Ord. 23-10, File No. 091233, App. 2/11/2010; Ord. 27-13
, File No. 121200, App. 2/19/2013, Eff. 3/21/2013; Ord. 108-15, File No. 150175, App. 7/2/2015, Eff. 8/1/2015; Ord. 220-20, File No. 200949, App. 11/6/2020, Eff. 12/7/2020; Ord. 164-23, File No. 230647, App. 7/28/2023, Eff. 8/28/2023)
Department Heads are authorized to procure as-needed professional services for temporary professional services to supplement the expertise or experience of the department for one or more Public Work or Improvement projects in conformance with Sections 6.40 through 6.42, with the following limitations:
(a) The Department Head shall designate an as-needed professional service Contract as a single-project or multiple-project Contract in the request for proposals or qualifications.
(b) Work shall be assigned by contract service orders. Contract service orders shall include a scope of services, time, and a not-to-exceed fee.
(1) A multiple-project as-needed Contract shall provide for a not-to-exceed amount and a Contract term of not more than five years from the date of certification by the Controller of the Contract, including all modifications. The cumulative modifications to a multiple-project as-needed Contract shall not exceed 150% of the original not-to-exceed amount. No contract service order or multiple contract service orders for services provided for any single project, whether in one phase or multiple phases, shall cumulatively exceed the Threshold Amount, including all modifications. A department may issue or modify any contract service order(s) to exceed the foregoing limit only upon the Department Head's written determination establishing the justification for proceeding under the as-needed Contract rather than soliciting services through a formal competitive process.
(2) A single-project as-needed Contract shall provide for a not-to-exceed amount and identify the public work. The scope of the contract service orders must be limited to that single Public Work or Improvement. The limitations in subsection 6.43(b)(1) shall not apply to single-project as-needed Contracts.
(c) If a department has more than one as-needed multiple-project professional services Contract for the same scope of services, prior to issuance of any contract service order under that Contract, the department shall document the selection process of the Contractor from the other Contractors holding contracts for the same scope of services. At a minimum, the written documentation shall address the following:
(1) The work or services required to meet the department’s needs;
(2) The proposed Contractor’s unique qualifications or experience to perform the work or services, or why the nature of the work or services requires use of the Contractor; and
(3) The anticipated cost to the City and the department’s determination that such cost will be in the best financial interest of the City.
The department shall maintain the selection documentation for at least three years after termination or expiration of the Contract. The Controller shall periodically audit the procurement of these as-needed Contracts as provided in Charter Section F1.106.
Loading...