§ 31-79 SEVERABILITY.

   If any provision of this article is held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid by any Court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this ordinance shall not be invalidated.

(Ord. 2741, passed 10-22-1979)

ARTICLE III. BLIGHT VIOLATIONS

§ 31-80 CREATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS BUREAU.

   Pursuant to MCLA § 117.4q, the City of Flint hereby establishes an Administrative Hearings Bureau to adjudicate and impose sanctions for blight violations.

(Ord. 3772, passed 6-28-2010)

§ 31-81 BLIGHT VIOLATION.

   (a)   For purposes of this article, BLIGHT VIOLATION means a violation of the following Flint City Code sections: §§ 30-3, 30-7, 30-8, 30-9, 30-11, 30-12, 30-13, 30-15, 30-30.1, 39-1, 39-5, 39-7, 39-9, 39-10, 39-32, 39-43 and 39-43.1.

   (b)   BLIGHT VIOLATION also means a violation of Flint City Code §§ 11-1 and 24-1 if the violation relates to the condition of the exterior of a building or property maintenance.

(Ord. 3772, passed 6-28-2010)

§ 31-82 HEARING OFFICER.

   (a)   A Hearing Officer shall preside over contested blight violation hearings. The Hearing Officer shall play no role in enforcement activities.

   (b)   The Hearing Officer shall be a licensed attorney and otherwise meet all the qualifications as set forth in MCLA § 117.4q(11).

   (c)   The Hearing Officer will be appointed in a manner that is consistent with the Charter for the appointment of municipal officers or employees and shall only be removed for reasonable cause.

   (d)   The Hearing Officer shall have the following authority and duties:

      (1)   Hearing testimony and accepting evidence that is relevant to the existence of the blight violation.

      (2)   Issuing subpoenas directing witnesses to appear and give relevant testimony at the hearing, upon request of a party or a party’s attorney.

      (3)   Preserving and authenticating the record of the hearing and all exhibits and evidence introduced at the hearing.

      (4)   Issuing a determination, based upon the evidence presented at the hearing, whether a blight violation exists. The determination shall be in writing and shall include written findings of fact, a decision and an order. The City shall have the burden of establishing the responsibility of the alleged violator by a preponderance of the evidence. Unless the burden is met, the matter shall be dismissed. A decision and an order shall not be made except upon consideration of the record as a whole or a portion of the record as may be cited by any party to the proceeding and as supported by and in accordance with the competent, material, and substantial evidence. A decision and order finding the alleged violator responsible for the violation shall include the civil fine, if any, or any action with which the violator must comply, or both.

      (5)   Imposing reasonable and proportionate sanctions consistent with applicable ordinance provisions and assessing costs upon a finding that the alleged violator is responsible for the alleged violation.

(Ord. 3772, passed 6-28-2010)

§ 31-83 INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS.

   (a)   To initiate a proceeding for a blight violation, the City shall issue and serve upon an alleged violator a written violation notice on which an authorized local official records the occurrence or existence of 1 or more blight violations by the person cited and which directs the named person to pay a civil fine for the violation or appear at the Administrative Hearings Bureau as provided in this section. A violation notice to appear at an Administrative Hearings Bureau shall be treated as made under oath if the violation alleged in the notice occurred in the presence of the authorized local official signing the violation notice and if the notice contains the following statement immediately above the date and signature of the official: “I declare under the penalties of perjury that the statements above are true to the best of my information, knowledge, and belief”. An authorized local official may issue a violation notice to appear if, based upon the investigation, the official has reasonable cause to believe that the person is responsible for a blight violation and if the Chief Legal Officer or an Assistant City Attorney approves in writing the issuance of the violation notice.

   (b)   Any person authorized to issue a blight violation is also authorized to order the towing of abandoned vehicles.

(Ord. 3772, passed 6-28-2010; Ord. 3790, passed 2-14-2011)

§ 31-84 RESPONSE TO VIOLATION NOTICE.

   The person named in the violation notice shall appear on or before the time specified in the violation notice and may respond to the allegations in the notice, as follows.

   (a)   If the alleged violator wishes to admit responsibility for the blight violation, the person may do so by appearing in person, by representation, or by mail. If appearance is made by representation or mail, the Administrative Hearings Bureau may accept the admission as though the person personally appeared. Upon acceptance of the admission, a Hearing Officer may order any of the sanctions permitted under this section.

   (b)   If the alleged violator wishes to deny responsibility for the blight violation, or admit responsibility with an explanation, the person may do so by appearing in person on the date scheduled for the administrative hearing for the purpose of adjudicating the alleged violation.

   (c)   If the alleged violator fails to appear, a decision and order of default may be entered.

(Ord. 3772, passed 6-28-2010)