Sec. 28-100. Debarment or suspension causes.
The causes for debarment or suspension shall be limited to the following:
   Sec. 28-100(1). Conviction of any person or any affiliate of any person for commission of a criminal offense arising out of obtaining or attempting to obtain a public or private contract or subcontract, or in the performance of such contract or subcontract.
   Sec. 28-100(2). Conviction of any person or any affiliate of any person under any statute of the federal government, this state or any other state for embezzlement, theft, fraudulent schemes and artifices, fraudulent schemes and practices, bid rigging, perjury, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, or receiving stolen property; or any other offense indicating a lack of business integrity or business honesty which currently, seriously, and directly affects responsibility as a city contractor and which conviction arises out of or obtaining or attempting to obtain a public or private contract or subcontract, or in the performance of such contract or subcontract.
   Sec. 28-100(3). Conviction or civil judgment finding a violation by any person or affiliate of any person under state or federal antitrust statutes arising out of the response to a solicitation.
   Sec. 28-100(4). Violations of contract provisions within three (3) years of current debarment action, as set forth below, of a character which are reasonably deemed to be so serious as to justify debarment action:
   (a)   Abandonment of a contract without good cause; or
   (b)   Knowingly fails without good cause to perform in accordance with the specifications or within the time limit provided in the contract;
   (c)   Failure to perform or unsatisfactory performance in accordance with the terms of one or more contracts, except that failure to perform or unsatisfactory performance caused by acts beyond the control of the contractor shall not be considered to be a basis for debarment; or
   (d)   Failure to pay a contractor, subcontractor or material provider as required by A.R.S. section 32-1129.
   Sec. 28-100(5). A determination by the Arizona Registrar of Contractors that the contractor has violated the provisions of A.R.S. § 32-1129 or a finding of responsibility by the municipal court for a violation of Tucson Code section 11-38.
   Sec. 28-100(6). Any other cause that the director reasonably determines to be so serious and compelling as to affect responsibility as a city contractor, including suspension or debarment of such person or any affiliate of such person by another governmental entity for any cause listed in this section.
(Ord. No. 10404, § 1, 5-15-07)