*Editor’s note—Chapter 27 (§§ 27-1 through 27-63) is cited in Montgomery County v. Glenmont Hills Associates, Privacy World at Glenmont Metro Centre, 402 Md. 250, 936 A.2d 325 (2007). Chapter 27 is cited in Ruffin Hotel Corp v. Gasper, 418 Md. 594, 17 A.3d 676 (2011), Janey v. N. Hess Sons, Inc., 268 F. Supp. 2d 616 (2003), and Magee v. Dansources Technical Services, Inc., 137 Md. App. 527, 769 A.2d 231 (2001). Chapter 27, Article I, Division 1 is interpreted in Holiday Universal Club of Rockville, Inc. v. Montgomery County, 67 Md. App. 568, 508 A.2d 991 (1986), where the Court held Chapter 27 is a valid exercise of the police power and is not void for vagueness. Chapter 27, Article I, is discussed in Evans v. Technologies Applications & Services Co., 875 F.Supp. 1115 (D.Md. 1995). Chapter 27 is cited in McCrory Corp. v. Fowler, 319 Md. 12, 570 A.2d 834 (1990); in Holiday Spas v. Montgomery County Human Relations Commission, 315 Md. 390, 554 A.2d 1197 (1989); and in Hanna v. Emergency Medicine Associates, P.A., 77 Md. App. 595, 551 A.2d 492 (1989). Chapter 27 is discussed in City of Takoma Park v. Citizens for Decent Government, 301 Md. 439, 483 A.2d 348 (1984).
See County Attorney Opinion dated 5/11/05 analyzing disparate impact claims in lending practices and whether Chapter 27 encompasses these claims. See also the supplemental County Attorney Opinion dated 6/22/05.
2001 L.M.C., ch. 9, § 2, states: Transition and application. An Executive regulation or a Human Relations Commission regulation or rule in effect when this Act becomes law [August 13, 2001] remains in effect but is modified to the extent necessary to be consistent with Chapter 27 of the County Code, as amended by this Act. This Act applies to every complaint under Article I of Chapter 27, unless the complaint was resolved or is pending before a Commission panel or a court on the date this Act takes effect [August 13, 2001].
Article I. Commission on Human Rights.
§ 27-1. Statement of policy.
§ 27-1A. Reserved.
§ 27-2. Commission membership and case review boards.
§ 27-3. Officers; meetings; quorum; voting.
§ 27-4. Office of Human Rights.
§ 27-5. Duties generally.
§ 27-6. Definitions.
§ 27-7. Administration and enforcement.
§ 27-8. Penalties and relief.
§ 27-9. Civil actions.
Division 1. Discrimination in Public Accommodations.
§ 27-10. Scope.
§ 27-11. Discriminatory practices– in general.
§ 27-11A. Discriminatory practices – specific protections for LGBTQ individuals in care facilities.
§ 27-11B. Gender-inclusive single-user restrooms.
Division 2. Discrimination in Real Estate.
Subdivision A. Discrimination in Housing.
§ 27-12. Discriminatory housing practices.
§ 27-13. Posting of notices; reports.
§ 27-14. Applicability of division.
§ 27-15. Licensing and licensing authorities.
§ 27-15A. Fair criminal history and credit screenings in rental housing.
Subdivision B. Discrimination in Commercial Real Estate.
§ 27-16. Discriminatory practices in commercial real estate.
§ 27-17. Exemptions.
§ 27-18. Enforcement.
Division 3. Discrimination in Employment.
§ 27-19. Discriminatory employment practices.
§ 27-20. Notice to be posted; reports and records.
§ 27-21. Reports and records of person under investigation.
Division 4. Discrimination through Intimidation.
§ 27-22. Discrimination through intimidation.
§ 27-23. Parental liability.
§ 27-24. Alternative service; anti-hate/violence fund.
§ 27-25. Reliance on prior judicial decisions
§ 27-26. Partnership Fund for victims of hate/violence.
§ 27-26A. Coordination of fair housing activities.
§ 27-26B. Interagency fair housing coordinating group.
Article II. Commission for Women.
§ 27-27. Statement of policy.
§ 27-28. Created; composition; appointment; terms of office and compensation of members; meetings, etc.
§ 27-29. Powers and duties generally.
§ 27-30. Committees generally; advisory committees.
§ 27-31. Advisory council.
§ 27-32. Volunteers; consultants.
§ 27-33. Reserved.
§ 27-33A. Fees.
Article III. Commission on Aging.
§ 27-34. Statement of policy.
§ 27-35. Creation; composition; appointment; terms and compensation of members; meetings; quorum; reports.
§ 27-36. Executive secretary; additional personnel and facilities.
§ 27-37. Powers and duties generally.
§ 27-38. Committees.
§ 27-39. Volunteer workers and consultants.
Article IV. Community Action Agency.
§ 27-40. Statement of policy.
§ 27-41. Creation and organization.
§ 27-42. General powers and duties of Board.
§ 27-43. Committees and advisers.
§ 27-44. Authority of executive director.
§ 27-45. Reports.
§ 27-46. Repeal of current resolution.
Article V. Commission on Children and Youth.
§ 27-47. Statement of policy.
§ 27-48. Commission on Children and Youth Generally.
§ 27-49. Duties and responsibilities.
§ 27-49A. Citizens Review Panel for Children.
Article VI. Commission on People With Disabilities.
§ 27-50. Statement of policy.
§ 27-51. Commission—Composition and appointments; meetings; staff.
§ 27-52. Duties.
§ 27-52A. Advocacy.
Article VII. Committee for Ethnic Affairs.
§ 27-53. Committee for Ethnic Affairs—Established; membership; terms of membership; chairperson.
§ 27-54. Responsibilities of the Committee.
§ 27-55. Annual ethnic heritage festival.
§ 27-56. Reports.
§ 27-57. Committee support.
§ 27-58. Meetings.
§ 27-59. Compensation of members.
§ 27-60. Committee in advisory category.
§ 27-61. Advocacy.
Article VIII. Human Trafficking Prevention Committee.
§ 27-62. Human Trafficking Prevention Committee.
Article IX. Committee Against Hate/Violence.
§ 27-63. Committee Against Hate/Violence.
Article X. Displaced Service Workers Protection Act.
§ 27-64. Definitions.
§ 27-65. Transition employment period.
§ 27-66. Enforcement.
Article XI. County Minimum Wage.
§ 27-67. Findings and definitions.
§ 27-68. Minimum wage required.
§ 27-69. Tipped employees.
§ 27-70. Enforcement.
§ 27-70A. Annual impact analysis.
Article XII. Fair Criminal Record Screening Standards.
§ 27-71. Findings and purpose; definitions.
§ 27-72. Prohibited inquiries; retaliation.
§ 27-73. Rescission of a conditional offer based on criminal record.
§ 27-74. Exemptions.
§ 27-75. Enforcement and regulations.
Article XIII. Earned Sick and Safe Leave.
§ 27-76. Findings and definitions.
§ 27-77. Earned sick and safe leave required.
§ 27-78. Minimum earned sick and safe leave standards.
§ 27-79. Use of earned sick and safe leave.
§ 27-80. Notice.
§ 27-81. Records.
§ 27-82. Enforcement.
Article XIV. Racial Equity and Social Justice Advisory Committee.
§ 27-83. Racial Equity and Social Justice Advisory Committee.
Article XV. Minimum Work Week for Building Maintenance Workers.
§ 27-84. Definitions.
§ 27-85. Minimum work week; enforcement.
Article XVI. Employee Health Care Privacy.
§ 27-86. Prospective employees – Health care privacy.
Notes
| [Note] | Editor’s note—Section 27-1 is cited in Doe v. Montgomery County Board of Elections, 406 Md. 697, 962 A.2d 342 (2008). Section 27-1 is cited and quoted in Jacob v. Didlake Corp., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4095 (Jan. 19, 2007). Section 27-1 is cited and quoted in Jacob v. Didlake Corp., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4095 (Jan. 19, 2007). Section 27-1 is cited in Conaway v. Deane, 401 Md. 219, 932 A.2d 571 (2007). Section 27-1(b) is interpreted and quoted in Haas v. Lockheed Martin Corp., 166 Md. App. 163, 887 A.2d 673 (2005), where the court held that summary judgment granted to employer was proper where an employee filed a discrimination claim after the statute of limitations expired; limitations began to run on the date of notice of discharge, not when the actual discharge occurred. Section 27-1 is cited in Ridgely v. Montgomery County, 164 Md. App. 214, 883 A.2d 182 (2005), where the court held that firefighter’s narcolepsy prevented him from performing his duties but did not prevent him from working a different job and, therefore, did not support a claim of disability based on a disability. Section 27-1(f) is quoted in Manor Country Club v. Flaa, 387 Md. 297, 874 A.2d 1020 (2005), reversing and remanding 158 Md. App. 483, 857 A.2d 604 (2004), where the Court interpreted factors for calculating attorney’s fees under former language contained in Montgomery County Code § 27-7; the section was amended prior to the Court’s decision. Section 27-1 is quoted in Cohen v. Montgomery County Health and Human Services, 149 Md. App. 578, 817 A.2d 915 (2003), where the Court held that the employee’s claim that the County’s delay in providing reasonable accommodation for her disability stated a cause of action for employment discrimination based on disability. The above section is mentioned in Broadcast Equities v. Montgomery County, 123 Md. App. 363, 718 A.2d 648 (1998), vacated, Montgomery County v. Broadcast Equities, Inc., 360 Md. 438, 758 A.2d 995 (2000) (Broadcast Equities, Inc. failed to exhaust its administrative remedies before the Human Relations Commission). The above section is cited in American Red Cross v. Epperly, 351 Md. 216, 717 A.2d. 938 (1998). See County Attorney Opinion dated 4/8/03 indicating that sponsorship of a community dialogue on faith and understanding would not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution, because the program would not advance or inhibit religion. See County Attorney Opinion dated 6/13/00 explaining that the County cannot refuse access to facilities based on the fact that a group has a discriminatory membership policy.
2000 L.M.C., ch. 36, §§ 1, 2, 4 and 5, read as follows: Sec. 1. Short Title. This Act may be cited as the Genetic Information Employment Rights Act of 2000. Sec. 2. Findings. The County Council finds that: (a) Genetic status can be used as a proxy for otherwise illegal grounds for discrimination, such as discrimination based on religion, race, nationality, sex, or age, providing a loophole in employment protections previously guaranteed by County law. (b) The threat of discrimination in employment based on the actual or perceived genetic status of an employee (including an applicant for employment) discourages genetic testing that could prevent or reduce disease or disabilities, provide peace of mind for individuals at risk for certain genetic conditions, and improve medical knowledge through genetic research. (c) Montgomery County, as home to the Human Genome Project of the National Institutes of Health, the Food and Drug Administration, Celera Genomics, and other public and private institutions at the cutting edge of genetic research, is an international center for the discovery of genetic knowledge to improve public health and welfare that depends on clinical research volunteers who live and work in the County. (d) Other than an Executive Order protecting federal employees, federal, state, and local employment laws generally have not kept pace with recent, rapid advances in genetic testing and therapies. Sec. 4. Regulations. All County regulations in effect when this Act becomes law [March 21, 2001] continue in effect, except that any reference in a regulation to employment discrimination includes discrimination based on genetic status, as provided in this Act. Within 120 days after this Act becomes law [March 21, 2001], the County Executive and the Human Relations Commission must submit to the Council, for approval under method (2), any amendments to their respective regulations necessary to implement this Act. Sec. 5. Public Education Program. The Human Relations Commission must, within 90 days after this Act becomes law [March 21, 2001], propose to the County Council and County Executive a public education program to inform employers, employees, genetic research and testing organizations, and the general public about County law regarding employment discrimination based on genetic information. In developing the proposed program, the Commission should consider the advice of employee and employer groups, genetics researchers, human rights organizations, and other interested individuals and organizations. This Section does not limit any authority or duty of the Commission under Chapter 27 of the County Code. |
(a) The County Council finds that discrimination because of race, color, religious creed, ancestry, national origin, age, sex, marital status, disability, genetic status, presence of children, family responsibilities, source of income, sexual orientation, or gender identity adversely affects the health, welfare, peace, and safety of the community. Persons subject to discrimination suffer unemployment and under employment resulting in low family income, overcrowded housing, poor health conditions, antisocial behavior, poverty, and lack of hope, injuring the public welfare, placing a burden upon the public treasury to ameliorate the conditions thus produced and creating conditions which endanger the public peace and order. Montgomery County’s policy is to foster equal opportunity for all without regard to race, color, religious creed, ancestry, national origin, sex, marital status, age, disability, presence of children, family responsibilities, source of income, sexual orientation, gender identity, or genetic status and strictly in accord with their individual merits as human beings.
(b) The prohibitions in this article are substantially similar, but not necessarily identical, to prohibitions in federal and state law. The intent is to assure that a complaint filed under this article may proceed more promptly than possible under either federal or state law. It is not County policy, however, to create a duplicative or cumulative process to those existing under similar or identical state or federal laws. Once a complaint is fully adjudicated under a similar or identical state or federal law, the complaint should not be reprocessed under this article if the effect is duplicative or cumulative. (1969 L.M.C., ch. 33, § 1; 1972 L.M.C., ch. 21, § 1; 1977 L.M.C., ch. 30, § 1; 1978 L.M.C., ch. 6, § 1; 1984 L.M.C., ch. 26, § 1; 2000 L.M.C., ch. 36, § 3; 2001 L.M.C., ch. 9, § 1; 2004 L.M.C., ch. 3, § 1; 2007 L.M.C., ch. 18, § 1.)
Loading...