Loading...
The Commission has the following powers and duties:
(a) To research historic resources and to recommend to the planning board that certain of them be designated as historic sites or historic districts on the master plan for historic preservation and, hence, be subject to the provisions of this chapter.
(b) To recommend to the planning board, as needed, any update to the inventory of historic resources which is contained in the "Locational Atlas and Index of Historic Sites in Montgomery County."
(c) To act upon applications for historic area work permits and other matters referred to it for action pursuant to the provisions of this chapter.
(d) To appoint members to local advisory panels to assist and advise the commission on the performance of its functions.
(e) To recommend programs and legislation to the council and the planning board to encourage historic preservation in the Maryland-Washington Regional District.
(f) To review any legislation and proposals affecting historic preservation, including preparation of master plans, and to make recommendations on such legislation and proposals to appropriate authorities.
(g) To serve as a clearinghouse for information on historic preservation for county government, individuals, citizens' associations, historic societies and local advisory committees; to provide information and educational materials for the public; and to undertake activities to advance the goals of historic preservation in the county.
(h) To employ or hire consultants or other temporary personnel, consistent with county contract provisions, as deemed necessary to assist the commission in the accomplishment of its functions; such consultants or other personnel shall be compensated as may be provided for in the county budget.
(i) To administer an historic preservation easement program and any revolving funds or grant programs to assist in historic preservation.
(j) To advise the planning board, in the event of subdivision of land containing an historic resource, on the appurtenances and environmental setting necessary to preserve it.
(k) To delineate the extent of appurtenances and environmental setting associated with an historic site or resource. (Ord. No. 9-4, § 1; 1989 L.M.C., ch. 4, § 1; Ord. No. 11-59; Ord. No. 19-08, §1.)
Editor’s note—Section 24A-5 is quoted in Montgomery Preservation, Inc. v. Montgomery County Planning Board, 197 Md. App. 388, 14 A.3d 1 (2011).
(a) Required. An historic area work permit for work on public or private property containing an historic resource must be issuedpursuant to the provisions of this chapter before:
(1) Constructing, reconstructing, moving, relocating, demolishing or in any manner modifying, changing or altering the exterior features of any historic site or any historic resource located within any historic district.
(2) Performing any grading, excavating, construction or substantially modifying, changing or altering the environmental setting of an historic site or an historic resource located within an historic district;
(3) Erecting or causing to be erected any sign or advertisement (with the exception of those signs which temporarily advertise for sale an historic site or an historic resource located within an historic district, or which for a temporary period advertise a political viewpoint) on the exterior or on the environmental setting of any historic site or any historic resource located within any historic district.
(b) Exceptions. Nothing in this section shall be construed to require the issuance of an historic area work permit for any ordinary maintenance, repair of exterior features, any customary farming operations or any landscaping, which will have no material effect on historic resource located within an historic district, of which such features are a part. For the purposes of clarification of this section, the commission shall develop and publish guidelines regarding what activities constitute ordinary maintenance and shall send a copy of these guidelines by registered mail to all owners of historic resources designated on the master plan.
(c) Disclosure requirements.
(1) Applicants for permits to demolish or substantially alter the exterior features of any historic site or historic resource located within an historic district are required to disclose its identification as such in writing on any application therefor.
(2) Any person who shall undertake any work as stated in subsection (a) of this section without first obtaining an historic area work permit shall be subject to the penalties established in section 24A-11.
(d) Advice of commission prior to application. The commission shall adopt procedures to encourage owners of historic resourcesto seek the advice of the commission prior to filing an application for an historic area work permit, on the appurtenances and environmental setting appropriate to the resource, construction methods and materials, financial information concerning historic preservation or any other matter under this chapter affecting the issuance of a permit. (Ord. No. 9-4, § 1; Ord. No. 11-59.)
(a) Applications. An applicant for an historic area work permit must file an application with the Director. The application must contain all information the Commission requires to evaluate the application under this Chapter.
(b) Referral of application. Within 3 days after the application is complete, the Director must forward the application to the Commission for review.
(c) Public meeting. When the Commission receives the application, the Commission must schedule a public meeting to consider the application.
(d) Notice. The Commission must notify the Director and any citizen or organization that the Commission reasonably determines has an interest in the application of the time and place of the public meeting.
(e) Conduct of Commission meeting. The public meeting on the application must be informal and formal rules of evidence do not apply. The Commission must encourage interested parties to comment and must keep minutes of the proceedings on the application.
(f) Action by the Commission.
(1) The Commission must make a public decision on the application under paragraph (2) not later than 45 days after the applicant files the application or 15 days after the Commission closes the record on the application, whichever is earlier.
(2) The Commission must instruct the Director to issue or deny the permit. The Commission may require the Director to issue the permit with reasonable conditions necessary to assure that work under the permit does not harm the historical, architectural, archeological or cultural value of the historic resource.
(3) If the Commission instructs the Director to deny the permit, the Commission must notify the applicant in writing why the Commission denied the application.
(4) The commission must instruct the Director to issue the permit if the Commission finds that:
(A) denial of the permit would prevent the reasonable use of the property or impose undue hardship on the owner; and
(B) within 120 days after the finding in subparagraph (A), no person seeking preservation has submitted an economically feasible plan for preserving the structure.
(5) If the Commission does not act on an application within the time periods provided in this subsection, the application is approved, unless the applicant agrees to extend the deadline for Commission action.
(g) Miscellaneous provisions.
(1) The applicant for a permit has the burden of production and persuasion on all issues the Commission determines. If another historic preservation organization holds a deed of easement for the property in the application, the applicant must submit proof to the Commission that the organization conducted an exterior architectural review and approved the action for which the applicant is seeking a permit.
(2) (A) The Commission may, by regulations issued under method (2), delegate authority to a County employee qualified in historic preservation and assigned to staff the Commission to review and approve an application for work that commonly has no more than an insignificant effect on an historic resource.
(B) The regulations:
(i) must describe the types of work that staff can review and approve, and require the Commission to review any application that is not clearly subject to staff approval; and
(ii) may waive the public meeting and notice requirements of subsections (c) and (d) for applications clearly subject to staff approval.
(C) If the staff denies or does not act on an application within 5 days after the Commission received the application from the Director, the Commission must review the application de novo.
(D) Staff must report monthly to the Commission and each appropriate Local Advisory Panel about any application reviewed by the staff in the previous month, including the disposition of the application.
(3) A permit may impose conditions that require waiver of a provision of the building code if the waiver is allowed under the "historic structures" provision of the building code adopted under Section 8-14 and the code inspector determines that waiver is appropriate for the specific work covered by the permit.
(4) The Director must enforce this Chapter.
(h) Appeal.
(1) Within 30 days after the Commission makes a public decision on an application, an aggrieved party may appeal the Commission’s decision to the Board of Appeals, which must review the decision de novo. The Board of Appeals may affirm, modify, or reverse any order or decision of the Commission.
(2) A party may appeal a decision of the Board of Appeals under Section 2-114. (Ord. No. 9-4, § 1; Ord. No. 11-59; Ord. No. 13-111, § 1.)
(a) The commission shall instruct the director to deny a permit if it finds, based on the evidence and information presented to or before the commission that the alteration for which the permit is sought would be inappropriate, inconsistent with or detrimental to the preservation, enhancement or ultimate protection of the historic site or historic resource within an historic district, and to the purposes of this chapter.
(b) The commission shall instruct the director to issue a permit, or issue a permit subject to such conditions as are found to be necessary to insure conformity with the purposes and requirements of this chapter, if it finds that:
(1) The proposal will not substantially alter the exterior features of an historic site or historic resource within an historic district; or
(2) The proposal is compatible in character and nature with thehistorical, archeological, architectural or cultural features of the historic site or the historic district in which an historic resource is located and would not be detrimental thereto or to the achievement of the purposes of this chapter; or
(3) The proposal would enhance or aid in the protection, preservation and public or private utilization of the historic site or historic resource located within an historic district in a manner compatible with the historical, archeological, architectural or cultural value of the historic site or historic district in which an historic resource is located; or
(4) The proposal is necessary in order that unsafe conditions or health hazards be remedied; or
(5) The proposal is necessary in order that the owner of the subject property not be deprived of reasonable use of the property or suffer undue hardship; or
(6) In balancing the interests of the public in preserving the historic site or historic resource located within an historic district, with the interests of the public from the use and benefit of the alternative proposal, the general public welfare is better served by granting the permit.
(c) It is not the intent of this chapter to limit new construction, alteration or repairs to any 1 period or architectural style.
(d) In the case of an application for work on an historic resource located within an historic district, the commission shall be lenient in its judgment of plans for structures of little historical or design significance or for plans involving new construction, unless such plans would seriously impair the historic or architectural value of surrounding historic resources or would impair the character of the historic district. (Ord. No. 9-4, § 1; Ord. No. 11-59.)
Editor’s note—See County Attorney Opinion dated 12/22/98 explaining that the Historic Preservation Commission must consider historic area work permits (HAWP) guidelines, but is not bound by them.
In a case of demolition by neglect of an historic resource on public or private property, the following provisions shall apply:
(a) If the historic resource has been designated on the master plan as an historic site or an historic resource within an historic district, the director shall issue a written notice to all persons of record with any right, title or interest in the subject property, or the person occupying such premises, of the conditions of deterioration and shall specify the minimum items of repair or maintenance necessary to correct or prevent further deterioration. The notice shall provide that corrective action shall commence within 30 days of the receipt of such notice and be completed within a reasonable time thereafter. The notice shall state that the owner of record of the subject property, or any person of record with any right, title or interest therein, may, within 10 days after the receipt of the notice, request a hearing on the necessity of the items and conditions contained in such notice. In the event a public hearing is requested, it shall be held by the commission upon 30 days' written notice mailed to all persons of record with any right, title or interest in the subject property and to all citizens and organizations which the director feels may have an interest in the proceedings.
(1) After a public hearing on the issue of necessity of improvements to prevent demolition by neglect, if the commission finds that such improvements are necessary, it shall instruct the director to issue a final notice to be mailed to the record owners and all parties of record with any right, title or interest in the subject property advising of the items of repair and maintenance necessary to correct or prevent further deterioration. The owners shall institute corrective action to comply with the final notice within 30 days of receipt of the revised notice.
(2) In the event the corrective action specified in the final notice is not instituted within the time allotted, the director may institute, perform and complete the necessary remedial work to prevent deterioration by neglect and the expenses incurred by the director for such work, labor and materials shall be a lien against the property, and draw interest at the highest legal rate, the amount to be amortized over a period of 10 years subject to a public sale if there is a default in payment.
(3) Failure to comply with the original or final notice shall constitute a violation of this chapter for each day that such violation continues and shall be punishable as set forth in section 24A-11.
(4) In the event that the commission finds that, notwithstanding the necessity for such improvements, action provided in paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection would impose a substantial hardship on any or all persons with any right, title or interest in the subject property, then the commission shall seek alternative methods to preserve the historic site or historic resource located within an historic district. If none are confirmed within a reasonable time, the director shall not proceed in accordance with paragraphs (1) and (2).
(b) If the historic resource is listed in the “Locational Atlas and Index of Historic Sites in Montgomery County, Maryland,” or the microfilmed addenda to that atlas, published by the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, the director shall advise the planning board which, after receiving the recommendation of the commission, shall conduct a public hearing to determine whether the historic resource will be designated as an historic site or historic district in the master plan for historic preservation.
(1) Where the planning board determines that the historic resource will not be included in the master plan for historic preservation, no further action will be taken.
(2) Where the planning board determines that the historic resource in all likelihood will be included in the master plan for historic preservation, the Planning Board shall initiate an amendment to the master plan for historic preservation under Division II of the Land Use Article of the Maryland Code.
a. In the event that such amendment is adopted and the historic resource is placed on the master plan for historic preservation as an historic site or an historic resource within an historic district, the director shall give written notice to all persons with any right, title, or interest in the subject property of the conditions of deterioration and shall specify the items of repair or maintenance necessary to stabilize the condition of the historic resource and prevent further deterioration.
b. Such notice shall provide that such stabilization work shall commence within 30 days of receipt of the notice and shall be completed within a reasonable time thereafter.
c. In the event that stabilization action is not instituted within the time allotted, or not completed within a reasonable time thereafter, the director may institute, perform and complete the necessary stabilization work and the expenses incurred by the director for such work, labor or materials shall be a lien against the property, and draw interest at the highest legal rate, the amount to be amortized over a period of 10 years subject to a public sale if there is a default in payment. (Ord. No. 9-4, § 1; Ord. No. 11-59; 2013 L.M.C., ch. 4, § 1.)
(a) Application for permits for historic resources on locational atlas. Any applicant for a permit to demolish or substantially alter the exterior features of any historic resource which is listed in the "Locational Atlas and Index of Historic Sites in Montgomery County, Maryland," or the microfilmed addenda to that atlas, published by the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, but which is not designated as an historic site or historic district on the master plan for historic preservation, must disclose that fact on the application. If the historic resource is located in an area under review for designation as an historic district and is not under review for designation as an historic site, the application must be reviewed under the procedure in Section 24A-7 if the applicant seeks review under that Section.
(b) Referral to the planning board. If the applicant does not seek review under Section 24A- 7, the Director must promptly forward the permit application to the Planning Board to make a finding, after a public hearing, as to the significance of the historic resource and to determine whether, after considering the recommendations of the Commission, the property will be designated as an historic site or an historic resource within an historic district, listed in the master plan for historic preservation. The Planning Board's public hearing on an application to demolish or substantially alter any historic resource listed in the locational atlas satisfies the requirements of section 33A-6 for a public hearing on a preliminary draft amendment to the historic preservation master plan if all notice requirements of that section are met.
(c) Determination by the planning board.
(1) Where the planning board determines that the historic resource will not be included in the master plan for historic preservation, the director shall forthwith issue the permit.
(2) Where the planning board determines that the historic resource in all likelihood will be included in the master plan for historic preservation, the director shall withhold issuance of the permit once for a maximum period of 195 days from the date the application for demolition is filed. If, as a result of the master plan process, the property is designated an historic site or an historic resource within an historic district, the application shall be governed by the procedures established in section 24A-7.
If, after a public appearance as provided for in section 24A-7, the commission determines that failure to grant the permit applied for will have the effect of denying the property owner of all reasonable use of his property or causing him to suffer undue hardship, then the commission must instruct the director to issue the permit subject to such conditions, if any, as are found to be necessary to insure conformity with the purposes and requirements of this chapter.
(d) Time limits for planning board action.
(1) Within 60 days after the filing of an application, or within 15 days after the closing of the record following a public hearing, whichever occurs later, the planning board shall render its findings and determinations with respect to an application.
(2) Failure to adhere to the limits specified in section 24A-10 shall cause the permit to issue by operation of law, except in the event of a finding and further proceedings as provided in subsection (c)(2) of this section. (Ord. No. 9-4, § 1; Ord. No. 11-59; Ord No. 13-99, §1.)
Editor's note-Section 2 of Ord. No. 13-99 states: "Effective date and applicability. This ordinance takes effect on the date of Council adoption and applies to any permit application under Section 24A-10(a) of the Code that was not decided before the date this ordinance takes effect."
Any person who violates a provision of this chapter, or fails to comply with any of the requirements thereof, or disobeys or disregards a decision of the commission, or fails to abide by the conditions of a permit, shall be subject to punishment for a class A violation as set forth in section 1-19 of chapter 1 of the County Code. Each day a violation continues to exist shall constitute a separate offense. (Ord. No. 9-4, § 1; 1983 L.M.C., ch. 22, § 28; Ord. No. 11-59.)
The provisions of this chapter are severable and if any provisions, clause, sentence, section, word or part thereof is held illegal, invalid or unconstitutional, or inapplicable to any person or circumstances, such illegality, invalidity or unconstitutionality, or inapplicability shall not affect or impair any of the remaining provisions, clauses, sentences, sections, words or parts of the chapter or their applications to other persons or circumstances. It is hereby declared to be the legislative intent that this chapter would have been adopted if such illegal, invalid or unconstitutional provision, clause, sentence, section, word or part had not been included therein, and if the person or circumstance to which the chapter or part thereof is inapplicable had been specifically exempted therefrom. (Ord. No. 9-4, § 1; Ord. 1159.)
Loading...