Loading...
(a) Water quality inventory submittal. A person who is required under Section 19-62 to comply with this Article must submit the following documents as part of a proposed development plan, diagrammatic plan, schematic development plan, project plan, preliminary plan of subdivision, site plan, special exception, sketch plan, floating zone plan, or conditional use, whichever is first required. Each submission must be reviewed by the receiving agency as part of the plan or permit application, as provided by law.
(1) Stormwater management concept plan;
(2) Erosion and sediment control concept plan;
(3) Documentation showing avoidance or minimization of impacts on environmentally sensitive areas and priority forest conservation areas as specified in the Planning Board's Environmental Guidelines, and an analysis of available alternatives;
(4) Preliminary plan describing the proposed development which minimizes impervious area and, if applicable, meets imperviousness limits for the project as are required in a land use plan, watershed plan, or Comprehensive Water Supply and Sewer System Plan; and
(5) Any other information required in the technical manual.
(b) Preliminary water quality plan submission. Except where exempt under this Article, a person must submit the following, in addition to any information required for a water quality inventory, as part of a complete application for development approval as provided in Section 19-65:
(1) Description of the development proposal and all submissions normally required by law or regulation;
(2) Documentation of application for state or federal wetland permit;
(3) Description of any other mitigation techniques proposed by the applicant or required by applicable guidelines, law, or regulations; and
(4) Documentation of anticipated performance on water quality of each proposed measure, individually and together.
(c) Final water quality plan submission. A final water quality plan must be submitted as provided in Section 19-65 and must include the following:
(1) Stormwater management concept plan, revised as required by the Director, that identifies all proposed mitigation techniques and an analysis of how these measures will meet applicable performance criteria;
(2) Erosion and sediment control concept plan, revised as required by the Director;
(3) Proposed compliance program, revised as required by the Director, that describes the installation and inspection of all stormwater management facilities;
(4) Draft maintenance agreements and easements covering routine maintenance, long-term repair or replacement of any stormwater management facility or other facilities required by the water quality plan, and an assurance of access to the facilities for inspection and monitoring;
(5) Copy of valid water quality certification approved by state and federal agencies or, if not available, a report on the status of the certification review and a copy of any revision made to the certification application;
(6) Terms, conditions, and requirements as established in the approved preliminary water quality plan, or in the case of a preliminary water quality plan in conjunction with a development approval before the District Council, the terms, conditions, and requirements as required to be revised by the Planning Board or DPS Director to conform to the District Council action on the development plan, schematic plan, floating zone plan, or diagrammatic plan;
(7) Any other information required in the technical manual. (1994 L.M.C., ch. 32, § 1; 1996 L.M.C., ch. 20, § 1; 1998 L.M.C., ch. 12, § 1; 2001 L.M.C., ch. 14, § 1; 2002 L.M.C., ch. 16, § 2; 2013 L.M.C., ch. 9, § 1; 2016 L.M.C., ch. 8, § 1.)
(a) General.
(1) Coordinated with project review. Water quality review, including submittal and review of the preliminary and final water quality plans, where required, must be done in conjunction with the review process for a development plan, diagrammatic plan, schematic development plan, project plan, preliminary plan of subdivision, site plan, sketch plan, floating zone plan, conditional use, or special exception in accordance with this Section. The Planning Director must coordinate review of the water quality plan with the DPS Director.
(2) Division of approval responsibilities. To avoid duplication of effort, responsibilities for review and approval of water quality plans are divided as follows:
(A) In acting on a preliminary or final water quality plan, the Planning Board has lead agency responsibility for:
(i) Conformity with all policies in the Planning Board's Environmental Guidelines which apply to special protection areas;
(ii) Conformity with any policy or requirement for special protection areas, including limits on impervious area, in a land use plan, watershed plan, or the Comprehensive Water Supply and Sewer System Plan; and
(iii) Any other element of the plan in which the Planning Board has primary lead agency design, review, and approval responsibility.
(B) In acting on a preliminary or final water quality plan, the Planning Board's approval must conform to the approval of the DPS Director on any element for which the DPS Director has lead agency responsibility. Those elements include:
(i) Performance goals for the approved best management practices;
(ii) Stormwater management concept plan;
(iii) Erosion and sediment control concept plan; and
(iv) Any other element of the plan for which the Department has primary lead agency design, review, and approval responsibility.
(C) The Department of Environmental Protection has the lead agency responsibility for the monitoring program, including the monitoring of streams and best management practices.
(3) Amendments and minor modifications to an approved plan.
(A) Significant amendment. Any written request to amend a development approval which involves any significant alteration to a water quality plan must undergo review as described in subsection (b), except as otherwise modified by regulation.
(B) Minor modification. The Planning Director or the DPS Director may approve a modification to an approved water quality plan, for any element in their respective jurisdictions, which is consistent with this Chapter if:
(i) inspections or design evaluations reveal minor inadequacies in the plan; or
(ii) the modification is required by permit conditions and does not significantly affect site layout.
(C) Emergency situation. The Planning Director or the DPS Director may approve a modification or exception to an approved water quality plan for any element in their respective jurisdictions where necessary in an emergency situation.
(b) Application.
(1) The applicant must submit to the Planning Director a preliminary water quality plan as part of a complete application for a development plan, diagrammatic plan, schematic plan, project plan, sketch plan, floating zone plan, preliminary plan of subdivision, or site plan, whichever is first required. For a special exception or conditional use that is subject to this Chapter, the applicant must submit a preliminary water quality plan as part of the special exception or conditional use application to the Board of Appeals. For a project on publicly owned property, the agency or department should submit the water quality plan in conjunction with the mandatory referral process.
(2) If the development proposal requires more than one of the approvals listed in paragraph (1), the applicant must submit a preliminary water quality plan to the Planning Director in conjunction with the first approval and a final water quality plan in conjunction with the last approval.
(3) If only one approval listed in paragraph (1) is required, an applicant, with the approval of the Planning Board, must submit a combined preliminary and final water quality plan.
(c) Review. After receiving a preliminary or final water quality plan, the Planning Director must refer the plan to the DPS Director and other reviewing agencies. The DPS Director must transmit to the Planning Director within the time limits for acting on a plan established by law:
(1) Findings on compliance with this Chapter of any:
(A) stormwater management concept plan;
(B) erosion and sediment control concept plan;
(C) stream monitoring plan and best management practices monitoring plan as prepared and implemented by the Department of Environmental Protection;
(D) maintenance agreements and easements; and
(E) other element of a plan in which the Department has primary lead agency review and approval responsibility.
(2) Comments, if any, on any element of a plan in which the Planning Board has primary lead agency review and approval responsibility, including any determination of conformance with a land use plan, watershed plan, or the Planning Board's Environmental Guidelines.
(d) Condition of approval.
(1) In the case of a water quality plan in conjunction with an amendment to a development plan, schematic development plan, diagrammatic plan, sketch plan, or floating zone plan, Planning Board action on the water quality plan must conform to Section 7.2.1.E or Section 7.7.1.B of Chapter 59.
(2) In the case of a water quality plan in conjunction with a special exception, the Planning Board, after holding a public hearing and finding that the plan meets the standards of this Article, must approve a water quality plan and forward the approved plan to the Board of Appeals with its recommendation on the special exception in accordance with Section 59-G-1.2.
(3) The final water quality plan, as amended by the Planning Board, must be a condition of approval of the development application and must conform to:
(A) changes made by the DPS Director to elements that are in DPS's jurisdiction under subsection (a)(2);
(B) any requirements and limits of the state water quality certification and wetland permit, as approved or, if not yet approved, as applied for, and other regulatory approvals, not inconsistent with the certification or permit;
(C) any regulations and guidelines, including any policies or requirements in a land use plan, watershed plan, or Comprehensive Water Supply and Sewer System Plan concerning water quality protection in a special protection area;
(E) any other condition necessary to implement this Article.
(4) For a water quality plan for a project on public property, the Planning Board, after public hearing which may be conducted when the Board considers a mandatory referral application, must determine if the plan meets the standards of this Article. The applying agency or department should not engage in land-disturbing activities that are inconsistent with the approved combined water quality plan unless the applying agency has found that the water quality protection measures it would otherwise use meet the purposes of this Chapter. (1994 L.M.C., ch. 32, § 1; 1996 L.M.C., ch. 20, § 1; 1998 L.M.C., ch. 12, § 1; 2001 L.M.C., ch. 14, § 1; 2002 L.M.C., ch. 16, § 2; 2013 L.M.C., ch. 9, § 1; 2016 L.M.C., ch. 8, § 1.)
(a) Enforcement agreement. Each final water quality plan must contain an enforceable agreement, including an approved financial security instrument, with the Planning Board and the DPS Director, requiring maintenance of all facilities required by the plan. The financial security instrument may be combined with any other financial security instrument required by this Chapter.
(b) Transference of responsibility. Each approved final water quality plan for a residential project must provide that neither ownership nor maintenance of any feature of the water quality plan may be transferred to the County, a homeowners association, or any resident until the DPS Director or the Planning Board, depending on which is the lead agency to review the feature, finds that:
(1) each feature has been installed in accordance with the specifications shown on the approved plan;
(2) each feature has been verified, by inspection to have been operational and functioning as designed for a reasonable period of time after construction of all units and facilities associated with the last phase of the development project; and
(3) homeowners association documents include detailed instructions and a schedule concerning how the facilities and features operate and should be maintained, and assure adequate funding for routine and long term inspections, repair and maintenance of all features shown on the approved plan.
(c) Appeals.
(1) An aggrieved person may appeal a final decision by the Planning Board or the DPS Director concerning a final development approval or permit in which the provisions of this Article are applied.
(A) A final decision by the Planning Board occurs when a written opinion concerning a development approval which requires the implementation of a final water quality plan is mailed.
(B) A final decision by the DPS Director occurs when the Department has approved, rejected, issued, modified, or revoked a permit which requires the implementation of a final water quality plan.
(2) An appeal of a final decision by the Planning Board must be filed with the Circuit Court within 30 days after the written opinion is mailed. The DPS Director may intervene as a party in any appeal involving the implementation of a final water quality plan. The Board of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to hear any appeal arising from a final decision by the Planning Board under this Article.
(3) An administrative appeal of a decision by the DPS Director must be filed with the Board of Appeals within 30 days after the decision is made. The Planning Board may present evidence to the Board of Appeals concerning any element of a final water quality plan that relates to its lead agency authority, if relevant to the appeal.
(d) Event of default.
(1) Events of default are:
(A) Required stormwater management facilities, erosion and sediment control facilities, or other mitigation techniques have not been installed or maintained in a correct manner.
(B) An applicant has not complied with any other requirement of a water quality plan or this Article.
(C) Required fees have not been paid to support a stream monitoring program.
(2) If an event of default occurs, the Planning Board or the DPS Director, as applicable, may, in addition to any other remedy already permitted under this Chapter:
(A) issue an order prohibiting the applicant from performing any further land-disturbing activities on any developed or undeveloped phase of the project until the applicant is in compliance, or revoking or suspending a permit under Section 19-9.
(B) issue a citation for a Class A violation. Each day a violation continues is a separate offense.
(C) take any legal action under Section 1-20 or Chapter 50.
(e) Waiver.
(1) Written request. An applicant may apply for a waiver from this Article or any regulation adopted under it if enforcement would result in undue hardship to the applicant. The application must be directed to either the Planning Board or the DPS Director, as applicable.
(2) Review and action. After consulting reviewing agencies and holding a public hearing, the Planning Board or the DPS Director, as applicable, may waive any requirement if the applicant shows by clear and convincing evidence that:
(A) the application of some or all requirements of this Article would result in undue hardship to the applicant because of events or circumstances not caused or facilitated by the applicant;
(B) the applicant would still comply with all applicable federal, state, or County water quality standards; and
(C) the relief sought is the minimum needed to prevent hardship. (1994 L.M.C., ch. 32, § 1; 1996 L.M.C., ch. 20, § 1; 1998 L.M.C., ch. 12, § 1; 2001 L.M.C., ch. 14, § 1; 2002 L.M.C., ch. 16, § 2; 2013 L.M.C., ch. 9, § 1.)
(a) Stream monitoring program.
(1) Program. The Director of Environmental Protection must design, develop, and implement a stream monitoring program as described in regulations adopted under this Chapter.
(2) Priorities. The Director of Environmental Protection must set priorities for monitoring subwatershed areas before development. Priorities must be based on anticipated timing of development within a 2-year period, as indicated by the Planning Director.
(b) Regulations; technical manual; environmental guidelines; performance goals. The Departments of Permitting Services and Environmental Protection, after consulting the Planning Board, must jointly adopt regulations, including a technical manual and necessary procedures, under method (2) to administer this Chapter. The Departments and the Board must carry out their functions under this Article in accordance with these regulations. The regulations must include:
(1) procedures and standards for preparing a water quality inventory, preliminary or final water quality plans, and a combined preliminary/final water quality plan;
(2) procedures to enhance coordination between the Department and the applicant where a wetland permit or water quality certification is also required;
(3) supplementary requirements for stormwater management and erosion and sediment control concept plans for special protection areas;
(4) criteria for distinguishing minor and significant amendments or modifications;
(5) standards for water quality protective measures during and after construction, including special restrictions or standards required for special protection areas;
(6) model language for an enforcement agreement or a homeowners association maintenance agreement;
(7) other appropriate program requirements consistent with this Article.
(c) Annual Report. The Directors of Environmental Protection and Permitting Services jointly must prepare an annual report, in coordination with the Planning Board, to the County Council that describes the effectiveness of best management practices and the observed impact of development on the biological integrity of streams in special protection areas. A copy of the report must be sent to the Planning Board and other responsible agencies.
(d) Fee.
(1) The Directors of Environmental Protection and Permitting Services may set a fee in an amount not to exceed the reasonable cost of administering, implementing, and enforcing their respective duties under this Article. The fee, including the time when it must be paid, must be set by regulation under Method (3). The Planning Board may set a fee under Chapter 50. A person to whom this Article applies must pay the fees.
(2) The fees established under this subsection may be based on the size of a tract or other relevant factor and are intended to offset the cost of:
(A) permit review and enforcement of conditions; and
(B) monitoring of streams and best management practices to determine the impact of a particular development on stream water quality as well as the effectiveness of certain best management practices in maintaining stream water quality. (1994 L.M.C., ch. 32, § 1; 1996 L.M.C., ch. 20, § 1; 1998 L.M.C., ch. 12, § 1; 2001 L.M.C., ch. 14, § 1; 2002 L.M.C., ch. 16, § 2; 2013 L.M.C., ch. 9, § 1.)
(a) Definitions. As used in this Section:
Coal tar pavement sealant means a pavement sealant that contains coal tar, coal tar pitch, coal tar pitch volatiles, RT-12, refined tar, or a variation of those substances assigned the chemical abstracts service (“CAS”) number 65996-92-1, 65996-93-2, 65996-89-6, or 8007-45-2.
Director means the Director of the Department of Environmental Protection or the Director’s designee.
High-PAH pavement sealant means a pavement sealant containing:
(1) steam-cracked petroleum residues, steam-cracked asphalt, pyrolysis fuel oil, heavy fuel oil, ethylene tar, ethylene cracker residue, or a variation of those substances assigned the CAS number 64742-90-1 or 69013-21-4; or
(2) more than 0.1% (1000 ppm) polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, by weight, using a standard testing protocol for determining the PAH content of a pavement sealant approved by the Director.
PAH means Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons.
Pavement sealant means a material intended to be surface applied to an asphalt or concrete surface, including a driveway or parking lot, to protect or seal the asphalt or concrete. Pavement sealant does not include material applied to a roof.
(b) Use of coal tar or high-PAH pavement sealants prohibited.
(1) A person must not use a coal tar or high-PAH pavement sealant in the County.
(2) Both the property owner and the applicator have violated this Section if a coal tar or high-PAH pavement sealant is applied in the County.
(c) Sale. A person must not sell or offer for sale a coal tar or a high-PAH pavement sealant in the County.
(d) Enforcement. The Director must:
(1) publish a list of pavement sealants acceptable for use on asphalt and concrete in the County that are not coal tar or high-PAH pavement sealants;
(2) ensure all pavement sealants on the list in paragraph (1) have been tested using a standard testing protocol for determining the PAH content of a pavement sealant approved by the Director; and
(3) generally enforce this Section. (2012 L.M.C., ch. 16, § 1;
2019 L.M.C., ch. 23
, §1.)
Editor’s note—2019 L.M.C., ch. 13, §2, states: Effective Date. The amendments in Section 1 take effect on July 1, 2020. The Executive must submit a report to the Council on or before April 1, 2020 describing the availability of a standard testing protocol for determining the PAH content in a pavement sealant.
Former Section 19-68, authority of department of environmental protection, was renumbered Section 19-69 by 2012 L.M.C., ch. 16, § 1.
The Director of Environmental Protection may, within 5 working days after the Department of Permitting Services issues any permit or other approval under this Chapter, suspend, revoke, or modify that permit or approval if the DEP Director finds that the issuance of the permit or approval did not protect the water resources of the County to the extent required by this Chapter or otherwise did not comply with this Chapter. The recipient of any permit or other approval under this Chapter must not take any action allowed by the permit or approval during that 5-day period. Any person aggrieved by an action of the DEP Director under this Section may appeal that action to the Board of Appeals within 30 days after the action is taken. A decision by the DEP Director not to suspend, revoke, or modify a permit or approval under this Section is not appealable, and must not be considered in any later appeal of the issuance of a permit or other approval or in any other proceeding. (1996 L.M.C., ch. 20, § 1; 1998 L.M.C., ch. 12, § 1; 2001 L.M.C., ch. 14, § 1; 2002 L.M.C., ch. 16, § 2; 2012 L.M.C., ch. 16, § 1.)
Editor’s note—Former Section 19-69, violations, was renumbered Section 19-70 by 2012 L.M.C., ch. 16, § 1.
Loading...