Loading...
If a bond is required under the license provisions of Title 4, the corporation counsel or comptroller, or their respective designee(s), may review or investigate such bond before a license is granted or renewed. A bond may be rejected by the city on legal or financial grounds. If the bond is rejected, the applicant or licensee shall be notified of the reason(s) why the bond was rejected and may submit a new bond for approval by the corporation counsel or comptroller or their respective designee(s).
(Added Coun. J. 5-9-12, p. 27485, § 14)
If a person fails to pay any fine, assessment of costs or other sum of money owed to the city pursuant to an order of the department, a court order or an order of the department of administrative hearings within 30 calendar days of such fine, assessment or sum of money becoming a debt due and owing to the city within the meaning of Chapter 1-19 of this Code, such person's license may be suspended or revoked by the department in accordance with the requirements set forth in Section 4-4-280. If the license is suspended, the suspension shall remain in effect until such time that the fine, assessment of costs or other sum of money is paid in full. If the license is revoked, the licensee shall be barred from applying for a new or different city license for a period of one year after the date of revocation.
(Added Coun. J. 5-9-12, p. 27485, § 14)
(a) Each business that is either licensed by the City or exempt from licensure pursuant to Section 4-4-020(a)(3) and that is located on a ground floor shall be allowed one fast-track business sign without the need for a sign permit issued by the Department of Buildings, subject to the restrictions of this Section 4-4-100.
(b) The Commissioner may promulgate rules for the administration of the fast-track business sign program, including, but not limited to, requiring that the sign display a Department issued decal.
(c) For purposes of this section, the term "fast-track business sign" is defined as an on-premise sign, as that term is defined in Section 17-17-02109, of no more than 16 square feet (4.87 m2) in area located in the interior side of a ground floor window of the on-premise business. In no event may the sign extend over the public way, be a dynamic image display sign, a flashing sign, or a video display sign. Further, the sign must be of a type allowed for that location under Title 17 of this Code. An on-premise ground floor window sign that is electrically powered must comply with Chapter 14E of this Code. A business sign that is electrically hard-wired is subject to issuance of an electrical permit and must be installed by a registered electrical contractor pursuant to that electrical permit. The exemption from a sign permit requirement under this section is for one on-premises sign per business only and the 16 square feet (4.87 m2) allotment may not be divided among multiple signs. The sign authorized by this Section is in addition to window signs allowed under Section 13-20-550(d) of this Code. The sign authorized by this section shall be not counted in the calculation of the total sign area restrictions imposed by Section 17-12-1003.
(d) The fee for each fast-track business sign shall be $250.00.
(Added Coun. J. 11-26-19, p. 11390, Art. IX, § 2)
(a) No property owner shall allow any person to operate on such owner's property any business for which a license is required under this Code without a license first having been obtained for such business.
(b) Any property owner who violates subsection (a) of this section shall be notified in writing by the department of the fact of such violation and of the property's duty to correct such violation of this section. If the property owner fails to correct such violation by the date certain set forth in the written notice required under this section, the property owner shall be subject to a fine of up to $500.00 for the first offense of subsection (a) within any five year period; of up to $5,000.00 for the second offense of subsection (a) within any five year period; and of up to $10,000.00 for the third or any subsequent offense of subsection (a) within any five year period. Each day that a violation continues shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. Mitigating factors that may be considered in determining the amount of the fine to be imposed against the property owner shall include the following: (1) proof that the property owner has initiated eviction proceedings against the tenant engaged in the unlicensed business activity; (2) proof that the property owner called 311 in a timely manner to report the unlicensed business activity; (3) proof that the property owner filed a timely complaint with 311 online through www.cityofchicago.org to report the unlicensed business activity; or (4) any other mitigating factor set forth in regulations duly promulgated by the commissioner.
(Added Coun. J. 5-9-12, p. 27485, § 14)
(a) No third-party facilitator shall allow any customer to use such facilitator's application to arrange to use, or to use, a client's services or property unless such client has obtained all licenses required under this Code or under any other applicable law.
(b) Any third-party facilitator who violates subsection (a) of this section shall be notified in writing by the department of the fact of such violation and of the facilitator's duty to correct the violation of this section. If the facilitator fails to correct such violation by the date certain set forth in the written notice required under this subsection (b), the facilitator shall be fined up to $500.00 for the first violation of subsection (a) within any five-year period; up to $5,000.00 for the second violation of subsection (a) within any five-year period; and up to $10,000.00 for the third or any subsequent violation of subsection (a) within any five-year period. Each day that a violation continues shall constitute a separate and distinct offense. Mitigating factors that may be considered in determining the amount of the fine to be imposed against the third-party facilitator shall include the following: (1) proof that the facilitator had removed from its application the client engaged in the unlicensed business activity prior to date on which the written notice required under this subsection (b) was mailed or otherwise provided; (2) proof that the facilitator had called 311 to report the client's unlicensed business activity prior to the date on which the written notice required under this subsection (b) was mailed or otherwise provided; (3) proof that the facilitator had filed a complaint with 311 online through www.cityofchicago.org to report the client's unlicensed business activity prior to the date on which the written notice required under this subsection (b) was mailed or otherwise provided; or (4) any other mitigating factor set forth in rules duly promulgated by the commissioner.
(c) As used in this section:
"Application" means any software installed and available for download on a computer, tablet, smart phone or other electronic device, or any website, mobile application or platform, internet-enabled application or platform, digital platform or internet service used by a third-party facilitator to connect the facilitator's customers with the facilitator's clients.
"Client" means any person who has an agreement, whether express or implied, with a facilitator to directly or indirectly provide services of any type to the facilitator's customers or to allow the facilitator's customers to directly or indirectly use such client's property for any purpose if such client requires a license under this Code or under any other law to engage in the applicable business activity.
"Customer" means any person who uses a facilitator's application to arrange to use or to use any services or property owned or leased by a facilitator's client.
"Property" means real or personal property.
"Third-party facilitator" or "facilitator" means any person who operates or maintains an application to connect customers with clients. The term "third-party facilitator" or "facilitator" does not include: (1) short term residential rental intermediaries as that term is defined in Section 4-13-100; or (2) transportation network providers as defined in Section 9-115-010; or (3) any other category of persons exempt from this section by express provisions of this Code.
(Added Coun. J. 6-25-21, p. 31925, Art. V, § 2; Amend Coun. J. 11-7-22, p. 54948, Art. V, § 1)
(a) No license fee or part thereof shall be refunded or rebated to any person, unless the commissioner determines that (1) the license fee was collected in error, or (2) the holder of a license has been prevented from enjoying the full license privilege because such holder is (i) the sole proprietor of the licensed establishment, and (ii) on active-duty status in the United States Armed Forces regular component, reserve component or National Guard, and (iii) stationed beyond the corporate limits of the city; or (3) the licensed business is forced to close before the license period expires due to an exercise of the power of eminent domain by the government. If a refund or rebate of any license fee is requested and made pursuant to items (2) or (3) of this section, the amount of such refund or rebate shall be prorated to reflect the number of months remaining during the license period, as measured from the date on which the applicable requirements set forth in items (2) or (3) are met.
(b) If a license applicant files an incomplete license application with the department, and such applicant fails to complete the license application within 90 days after the date on which such incomplete application is filed, the license fee shall be forfeited to the city and a new application and license fee shall be required to process the application. Provided, however, that this requirement shall not apply to any license issued under Chapters 4-60 or 4-156 of this Code. Provided further, that this requirement shall not apply if the applicant's failure to complete the license application in a timely manner is caused by the city.
(Added Coun. J. 5-9-12, p. 27485, § 14)
Except as otherwise provided in subsection (d) of Section 4-4-060, a reinspection fee in the amount of $50.00 shall be assessed against the licensee for each necessary or appropriate inspection conducted by or caused to be conducted by the City to address code violation(s) previously identified in any inspection.
(Added Coun. J. 5-9-12, p. 27485, § 14)
(a) Whenever used in this section, the term "debt" shall mean:
(1) a sum of money owed to the City for which the period granted for payment has expired, including, but not limited to, any obligation or payment of a sum of money owed to the City pursuant to a court order or an order of the Department of Administrative Hearings, and in the case of a "tax" within the meaning of Section 3-4-020 of this Code, includes any unpaid tax liability, whether or not an assessment has been issued;
(2) any obligation or payment of a sum of money owed to a third party, including restitution, pursuant to an order of the Department of Administrative Hearings;
(3) a parking ticket, notice of parking violation, or parking violation complaint on which full payment has not been made or an appearance has not been filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County within the time specified on the complaint;
(4) a sum of money owed to the State of Illinois when the City has received certification from the State that the license applicant or licensee upon renewal has been given notice and an opportunity to contest the State's determination that such applicant or licensee owes the sum of money;
(5) a sum of money owed to the Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority for the M.P.E.A. Airport Departure Tax;
(6) a sum of money owed to the County of Cook when the City has received certification from the County, pursuant to procedures agreed upon by the County and the City, that the license applicant has been given notice and an opportunity to contest the County's determination that such license applicant owes the sum of money;
(7) a sum of money owed to any Sister Agency, as that term is defined in Section 1-23-010, when the City has received certification from the Sister Agency, pursuant to procedures agreed upon by the Sister Agency and City, that the license applicant has been given notice and an opportunity to contest the Sister Agency's determination that such license applicant owes the sum of money.
(b) (1) No initial or renewal license shall be issued under this Title to any license applicant if (1) issuance is prohibited by Section 1-23-400 of the Code, and (2) notice of the debt which triggers the prohibition on issuance in Section 1-23-400 has been provided to such applicant in accordance with the requirements set forth in Section 2-32-094(c); and (3) such debt has not been satisfied or otherwise resolved within the meaning of Section 2-32-094(a).
(2) (i) No initial or renewal license shall be issued under this Title to any license applicant or person owning either directly or indirectly, 25 percent or more of the interest in such applicant, if such applicant or person, at the time of application for such initial or renewal license, is a building code scofflaw pursuant to Section 2-92-416 of this Code.
(ii) Any applicant for any initial or renewal license issued under this Title shall certify to the City with his application whether or not such applicant or any person owning, directly or indirectly, 25 percent or more of the interest in the applicant is, at the time of application for such license or permit, identified as a building code scofflaw pursuant to Section 2-92-416.
For purposes of this subsection (b), the following definition shall apply: The term "25 percent or more of the interest in the applicant" shall mean 25 percent or more of the combined voting power or fair market value of all stock, partnership interests or other ownership interests in the applicant or the right to receive at any time the distribution of 25 percent or more of the income or profits of the applicant. Provided, however, that with respect to those licenses for which a lesser percentage of ownership interest is required to be disclosed, including, but not limited to, licenses issued under Chapter 4-60 (Liquor Dealers), the percentage of ownership set forth in the specific licensing ordinance shall be substituted for the term "25 percent" in the above definition.
(c) A late fee and interest shall be assessed in connection with a license renewal if the license cannot be issued or renewed in a timely manner due to outstanding debt.
(Added Coun. J. 5-9-12, p. 27485, § 14; Amend Coun. J. 1-21-15, p. 102428, § 4; Amend Coun. J. 11-20-19, p. 9510, Art. IV, § 9; Amend Coun. J. 11-24-20, p. 24003, Art. III, § 1; Amend Coun. J. 4-21-21, p. 29948, § 4; Amend Coun. J. 10-27-21, p. 39543, Art. IV, § 2)
No license shall be issued to or renewed by any applicant or person owning, either directly or indirectly, 25 percent or more of the interest in the applicant, and any license may be revoked, if such applicant or person is delinquent on any court-ordered child support arrearage or has failed to comply with a child support withholding notice. All license applicants shall certify in the license application whether the eligibility requirement set forth in this section have been met. For purposes of this section, the definition of the term "25 percent or more of the interest in the applicant", as set forth in subsection (b) of Section 4-4-150, shall apply. Provided, however, that with respect to those licenses for which a lesser percentage of ownership interest is required, the percentage of ownership set forth in the specific licensing ordinance shall be substituted for the term "25 percent" in such definition.
(Added Coun. J. 5-9-12, p. 27485, § 14)
Loading...