Loading...
(a) Purpose. The purpose of the site plan review procedure is to ensure that multi-family residential development and all nonresidential developments comply with the development and design standards of this code. Zoning permits for any building, structure, expansions, or use of land subject to this section, shall not be issued without an approved site plan.
(b) Applicability. The following forms of development shall require site plan review by the Planning Commission in accordance with this section:
(1) New construction, structural alterations and site improvements of all uses in nonresidential zoning districts and in R-2 and R-3 Districts;
(2) All conditional uses, in all zoning districts;
(3) Improvements to public property;
(4) Any proposal to alter, reconstruct, or otherwise modify any existing or previously approved site plan for a permitted use, conditional use or similar use that increases the number of dwelling units in a multi-family development; or changes the use in a manner which requires an increase in the amount of parking or a change in the site’s circulation; and
(5) Exemptions. The following forms of development within the above zoning districts shall be exempt from site plan review:
A. Single-family dwellings; and
B. Re-occupancy of an existing building or the internal construction or change in floor area of a building or structure that does not increase the gross floor area, increase the intensity of use, or affect parking or landscaping requirements on a site that meets all of the development standards of this code; and
C. Accessory and temporary uses as established in Chapter 1224: Accessory and Temporary Use Regulations.
(c) Site plan review procedure. The site review procedures shall proceed as follows:
(1) Step 1 - Pre-application meeting (required). An applicant shall be required to have a pre-application meeting with the Development Review Committee to informally discuss the application and any concept plans. Such meeting shall be subject to § 1214.01(f).
(2) Step 2 - Application. The applicant shall submit an application in accordance with § 1214.01: Common Review requirements, and with the provisions of this section.
(3) Step 3 - Development Review Committee review.
A. Upon determination that a site plan application is complete, the Development Review Committee shall review the application and may distribute the application to other departments or agencies for review and comment.
B. The Development Review Committee will review the application and provide a summary report of comments to the applicant.
C. Upon receipt of comments, the applicant shall have the option to make revisions to the application and plans based on the comments prior to being forwarded to the Planning Commission or may request that the application be forwarded to the Planning Commission without revisions. In all cases, the Development Review Committee will forward their report to the Planning Commission.
(4) Step 4 - Planning Commission review and decision.
A. The Planning Commission shall review the site plan application at its next regularly scheduled meeting, or at a special meeting, after the application is determined to be complete. If the site plan application includes an application for alternative equivalency review (see division (e) of this section), then such applications shall be simultaneously reviewed as part of this procedure.
B. In reviewing the application, the Planning Commission shall at a minimum, consider the review criteria of this section.
C. Within 60 days of the Code Administrator determining that the application is complete, the Planning Commission shall make a decision on the application. In making its decision, the Planning Commission may approve, approve with modifications or supplementary conditions, or deny the application.
D. If the Planning Commission fails to make a recommendation within the established timeframe, or an extended timeframe approved by the applicant, the application shall be deemed approved.
(d) Review criteria. In order to approve a site plan, the Planning Commission shall determine that:
(1) The proposed development is consistent with all the requirements of this code, and other related codes and ordinances of the city;
(2) The proposed development is in compliance with the applicable zoning district regulations;
(3) The proposed development complies with any established standards or requirements in the approved comprehensive land use plan or thoroughfare plan;
(4) The proposed development meets all the requirements or conditions of any applicable development approvals (e.g., previously approved planned developments, conditional use approvals, variance approvals and the like);
(5) The development will result in a harmonious grouping of buildings within the proposed development and in relationship to existing and proposed uses on adjacent property;
(6) The development will preserve and be sensitive to the natural characteristics of the site in a manner that complies with the applicable regulations set forth in this code;
(7) Adequate provision is made for safe and efficient pedestrian and vehicular circulation within the site and to adjacent property;
(8) The development will provide adequate lighting for safe and convenient use of the streets, walkways, driveways and parking areas;
(9) Upon review and recommendation of the Code Administrator, points of ingress/egress to the development shall be controlled and designed in such manner as to minimize conflicts with adjacent properties and developments;
(10) Adequate provision is made for emergency vehicle access and circulation; and
(11) If the project is to be carried out in progressive stages, each stage shall be so planned that the foregoing criteria are complied with at the completion of each stage.
(e) Alternative equivalency review.
(1) Purpose. Alternative equivalency review is a procedure that allows applicants to propose unique design options as an alternative to a development standard established in this code provided it meets or exceeds the intent of the design-related provisions. It is not a variance, waiver or weakening of regulations; rather, this procedure permits a site-specific plan that is equal to or better than the strict application of a design standard specified in this code. Alternative equivalency review shall apply only to the specific site for which it is requested and does not establish a precedent for assured approval of other requests.
(2) Applicability.
A. The alternative equivalency review procedure shall be available only for the following sections of this code:
1. Setbacks and yards as established in § 1226.01: Lot and Principal Building Regulations provided the adjustment to the setback or yard is less than 20% of the applicable requirements.
2. Section 1226.03: Fences and Walls;
3. Section 1226.04: Outdoor Lighting;
4. Chapter 1228: Architectural Standards;
5. Chapter 1232: Landscaping and Screening Standards; and
6. Chapter 1234: Parking, Access, and Mobility Standards.
B. Where an applicant is seeking a variance of standards that is not an alternative equivalency review, such application shall comply with § 1214.09: Variances.
(3) Review timing and decisions.
A. A request for alternative equivalency review shall be made concurrently with the applicable site plan application.
B. The Planning Commission shall have the authority to work with an applicant on an alternative equivalency approach to meeting the applicable standards as part of site plan review, regardless if a formal application is made.
C. The Planning Commission shall have the authority to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the alternative equivalency review application. Such action shall be separate from the decision on the applicable site plan application.
(4) Review criteria. Decisions on an alternative equivalency review application shall be based on consideration of the following criteria:
A. That the proposed alternative achieves the intent of the subject design or development standard to the same or better degree than the subject standard;
B. That the proposed alternative achieves the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan to the same or better degree than the subject standard;
C. That the proposed alternative results in benefits to the community that are equivalent to or better than compliance with the subject standard; and
D. That the proposed alternative imposes no greater impacts on adjacent properties than would occur through compliance with the specific requirements of this code.
(5) Conditions. The Planning Commission may impose conditions on an approval for alternative equivalency review provided such conditions are related to ensuring the performance of the alternative equivalency review to meet or exceed the subject standard. Such conditions may include required timeframes, amendments or revisions to the proposal, or the ability to revoke an approval for alternative equivalency review.
(6) Decisions. Any decision on an alternative equivalency review application shall not be binding on the city related to future applications requesting an alternative to any of the applicable standards. Each case shall be reviewed and decided upon based on the individual circumstances.
(7) Time limit.
A. An approval of an alternative equivalency review application shall expire if the site plan approval or zoning permit approval such alternative equivalency review application is associated with expires.
B. Upon expiration of an alternative equivalency review approval, a new application, including all applicable fees, shall be required before a new application will be reviewed.
(8) Appeals. Any person or entity claiming to be injured or aggrieved by any final action of the Planning Commission shall have the right to appeal the decision to the ZBA as established in § 1214.11: Appeals.
(f) Significance of an approved site plan.
(1) An approved site plan shall become, for the proposed development, a binding commitment of the specific elements approved for development. The approved site plan may be transferred to another person, corporation or group of individuals or corporations prior to the issuance of a building permit.
(2) All construction and development under any zoning permit and building permit shall be in accordance with the approved site plan. Any departure from such plan shall be cause for revocation of the zoning permit and/or building permit, and the property owner or other responsible parties are subject to penalties as prescribed by this code.
(g) Time limit.
(1) The applicant shall submit a completed application for a zoning permit within one year of the date the site plan was approved or the site plan approval shall expire.
(2) Upon expiration of a site plan approval, a new application, including all applicable fees, shall be required before a new site plan will be reviewed.
(3) Upon written request, one extension of six months may be granted by the Code Administrator if the applicant can show good cause for a delay.
(4) The Planning Commission may authorize alternative time limits for zoning permit issuance, as part of its approval, based on the scale of the proposed development.
(h) Appeals. Any person or entity claiming to be injured or aggrieved by any final action of the Planning Commission shall have the right to appeal the decision to the ZBA as established in § 1214.11: Appeals.
(Ord. 21-161, passed 12-13-2021)
(a) Purpose. The purpose of the COA is to provide a procedure by which to review construction, renovation, expansion and demolition projects within a locally or nationally designated historic district or for locally or nationally designated historic properties. In an effort to preserve the character of these properties and districts, the city has established reasonable development standards and design guidelines for buildings and structures and this procedure allows for a comprehensive review of the activities against the adopted standards and guidelines.
(b) Applicability.
(1) No person shall make any exterior construction, reconstruction, alteration or demolition of a structure on any property within a locally or nationally designated historic district or on a locally or nationally designated historic property unless a COA has been approved by the HPC and a zoning permit, if required, has also been issued.
(2) Minor site improvements such as the establishment of a paved surfaces with less than 200 square feet of surface areas, landscaping or other minor site work or changes to components of a property not specifically identified by the ordinance that applies to the historic district or property, shall not require a COA.
(3) Projects and activities that are exempt from the COA review procedure include:
A. The reconstruction, alteration or demolition of a structure or feature which has been ordered by the Chief Building Official upon certification of an unsafe condition constituting an emergency;
B. Painting or general maintenance of a structure that does not alter exterior architectural features including not altering the materials or color of such architectural features;
C. Changes in occupancy not involving structural or exterior work; and
D. Any interior renovations which will not alter and/or affect the exterior elevations and facade of the building or structure or any architectural features that are visible from the outside.
(c) COA review procedure. The review procedure for a COA shall be as follows:
(1) Step 1 - Pre-application meeting (optional). An applicant may request to have a pre-application meeting with the HPC to informally discuss the application and any concept plans. Such meeting shall be subject to § 1214.01(f).
(2) Step 2 - Application.
A. The applicant shall submit an application in accordance with § 1214.01: Common Review Requirements, and with the provisions of this section.
B. In making application, the Code Administrator or the HPC may request that the applicant provide exhibits, sketches, examples of materials, renderings or other documentation to assist in their decision.
(3) Step 3 - Staff review. Upon determination that a COA application is complete, the Code Administrator shall refer the application to the HPC.
(4) Step 4 - HPC Review and decision.
A. The HPC shall review the COA application at its next regularly scheduled meeting, or at a special meeting, after the application is determined to be complete.
B. The HPC shall at a minimum, consider the review criteria of this section.
C. Notification of the public meeting shall be provided in accordance with § 1214.01(h).
D. Within 60 days after the COA application is determined to be complete or is forwarded to them by the Code Administrator, the HPC shall hold a public meeting to review the application and make a decision on the application. In making its decision, the HPC may approve, approve with modifications, or deny the application. The HPC shall make every effort to work with the applicant within this time period to develop a proposal that the HPC can approve or approve with modifications.
E. If a COA is denied, the city shall not issue any permits that would allow modifications for which the COA was denied. In cases where the HPC has denied a COA, the HPC shall state the reasons for such disapproval in writing and transmit the written statement to the applicant together with any recommendation the HPC may have made for appropriate changes.
F. If the HPC fails to make a recommendation within the established timeframe, or an extended timeframe approved by the applicant, the application shall be deemed approved.
G. If a zoning permit is required for the subject work, the applicant may proceed with applying for the zoning permit following approval of the COA. Such zoning permit applications shall comply with the COA approval and any related modifications.
(d) Determining the significance of a structure.
(1) When making decisions or recommendations about changes to structures in the applicable historic districts or on historic properties, the HPC shall have the authority to make a determination of the historical or architectural significance of the structure based on this section.
(2) For structures that the HPC finds are not historically or architecturally significant, the HPC may relax or waive the standards or guidelines that apply to the project.
(3) If the HPC finds that the structure is historically or architecturally significant, the standards and guidelines of this code shall be fully applied as determined by the HPC.
(4) The HPC shall determine whether a structure or site is significant based on the structure’s:
A. Value as a reminder of the cultural, historical or archaeological heritage of the city, state or nation;
B. Location as a site of a significant local, state or national event;
C. Identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the development of the city, state or nation;
D. Identification as the work of a master builder, designer or architect whose individual work has influenced the city, state or nation;
E. Value as a building that is recognized for the quality of its architecture and that it retains sufficient elements showing such architectural significance;
F. Example of an architectural style or period; and/or
G. Character as a contributing element in a locally or nationally designated historic district.
(e) Review criteria. Decisions on a COA application shall be based on consideration of the following criteria:
(1) The proposed development is in compliance with all the requirements of this code and other related codes and ordinances enforced by the city;
(2) The proposed development incorporates any applicable standards or guidelines (see § 1228.05(b)), to the maximum extent feasible;
(3) The proposed development meets all the requirements or conditions of any applicable development approvals (e.g., PUD approvals, RPD approvals, conditional use approvals, variance approvals and the like); and
(4) There is no feasible and prudent alternative alteration or change which would conform to the guidelines, and adhering to the guidelines would deny the owner a reasonable rate of return on the real property or amount to a taking of property without just compensation.
(f) Denial of a COA application for demolition. In the case of a denial of a COA for demolition:
(1) The HPC and applicant shall undertake meaningful and continuing discussion to find a means of preserving the property;
(2) If the applicant fails to meet with the HPC in good faith and at specified times, then denial of the application will stand;
(3) After meeting with the applicant, if the HPC determines that denial would create a substantial hardship to the applicant, it shall propose a compromise which relieves the hardship, if it exists;
(4) If, after meeting with the applicant, the HPC has not reached a compromise with the applicant that relieves substantial hardship, then the applicant may appeal the decision, within 30 days of the said meeting, directly to the city. City Council may affirm, modify or reverse the HPC’s decision; and
(5) In the specific cases of demolition, the HPC may delay a decision for up to 180 days upon finding that a structure is of such importance that alternatives to demolition should be actively pursued by both the HPC and the applicant. Alternate steps to be investigated include, but are not limited to:
A. Consultation with civic groups, public agencies and interested citizens;
B. Recommendations for acquisition of the property by public or private bodies; and
C. Exploration of the possibility of moving one or more structures or other features.
(g) Compliance and modifications of a COA.
(1) The Code Administrator shall review the construction drawings, final plans and other similar documents for compliance with an approved COA, any conditions attached thereto, and any approved or required modifications thereof.
(2) If it is determined that a deviation from an approved COA is planned or constructed, a stop work order shall be issued by the Code Administrator.
(3) The Code Administrator and the HPC Chair together shall determine the impact of the modification with regard to the intent of an approved COA. Such determination shall be made within 72 hours following the issuance of a stop work order, if possible.
(4) Any modification may be approved administratively and the stop work order lifted if the Code Administrator and the HPC Chair determine that it is a minor modification to the approved COA.
(5) Any modification that is determined to be a major modification or that does not satisfy the intent of the approved COA will require a new application for a COA. The stop work order shall not be lifted until the new application has been heard and approved by the HPC.
(h) Time limit.
(1) The applicant shall submit a completed application for a zoning permit within one year of the date the COA was approved or the approval shall expire. The date of approval shall be the date the Code Administrator issues the COA.
(2) Upon expiration of a COA, a new application, including all applicable fees, shall be required before a new application will be reviewed.
(3) Upon written request, one extension of one year may be granted by the HPC if the applicant can show good cause for a delay.
(4) The HPC may authorize alternative time limits for zoning permit issuance based on the scale of the proposed development.
(i) Appeals. Any person or entity claiming to be injured or aggrieved by any final action of the HPC shall have the right to appeal the decision to the City Council in a manner similar to the appeals process established for the ZBA in § 1214.11: Appeals.
(Ord. 21-161, passed 12-13-2021)
(a) Purpose. The purpose of this designation procedure is to provide a clear method by which certain sites, buildings and larger districts are considered for formal designation as a historic landmark or historic district within the city, subject to enhanced review to ensure that the sites, buildings, or districts retain their historic significance.
(b) Historic landmark and historic district designation procedure. The review procedure for the designation of a historic landmark or historic district shall be as established in this section.
(1) Step 1 - Nomination.
A. The nomination for a single property, structure, landscape, site element or object in the city for historic landmark designation may be initiated by any of the following with written consent from all property owners specified in the nomination:
1. The owner of any property included in the nomination;
2. One or more HPC members;
3. One or more City Council members;
4. The Mayor; or
5. An organization or individual with a stated interest.
B. The nomination for an area to in the city for historic district designation may be initiated by a petition signed by the owners of no less than 75% of the total square footage of the area to be included in the district and shall include verification of such requirements with reference to the Lorain County Auditor’s real property records.
(2) Step 2 - HPC review and recommendation.
A. The HPC shall review the nomination at its next regularly scheduled meeting, or at a special meeting, after the application is determined to be complete.
B. Within 60 days after the nomination is determined to be complete, the HPC shall consider the nomination and forward the nomination and the HPC’s recommendation to the Planning Commission.
(3) Step 3 - Planning Commission review and recommendation.
A. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on the nomination at its next regularly scheduled meeting, or at a special meeting, after the HPC’s recommendation.
B. Notification of the public hearing shall be provided in accordance with § 1214.01(i).
C. The applicant(s) shall be exempt from the Planning Commission agenda fee.
D. Within 60 days after HPC makes its recommendation (Step 2), the Planning Commission shall consider the nomination and the HPC recommendation and recommend to City Council that the nomination be approved, approved with some modification, or denied.
(4) Step 4 - City Council review and decision.
A. The City Council shall hold a public hearing on the nomination at its next regularly scheduled meeting, or at a special meeting, after the Planning Commission’s recommendation.
B. Notification of the public hearing shall be provided in accordance with § 1214.01(i).
C. Within 60 days after the Planning Commission makes a recommendation (Step 3), City Council shall consider the nomination, the HPC’s recommendation, and the Planning Commission’s recommendation and make one of the following decisions:
1. Approve the nomination as requested and designate the landmark or district as a historic property. Approval shall require a two-thirds majority to override a proposal previously denied by the Planning Commission; or
2. Deny the proposal.
D. After a decision by City Council, the Clerk of Council shall notify all persons known to have a legal or equitable interest in said property. The Planning Commission, the Code Administrator, and HPC shall also be notified.
E. The Clerk of Council shall notify any appropriate county, state or federal offices after a designation is approved. The Clerk of Council shall cause to be recorded in the office of the Lorain County Recorder a copy of each ordinance designating a preservation district or landmark.
F. Designation of a historic district or landmark shall be considered a district overlay with the regulations of the underlying zoning district remaining in effect for any property designated as a landmark or included in a historic district.
G. Following the designation of the landmark property, the HPC may place or cause to be placed on such landmark an official city plaque, indicating that such property or part thereof has been designated a landmark in the city. In case of designation of a district, the HPC may place or cause to be placed official city plaques at appropriate location(s) near all entranceways to the new district. Plaques shall be installed subject to the provisions of Chapter 1236: Sign Standards. These official plaques shall remain the property of the city.
(c) Review criteria. In considering the designation of any building, structure, site, work of art or object as a landmark or any area which contains within definable geographic boundaries, buildings, structures or sites of historic architectural or archaeological significance as a historic district, the HPC shall apply the following criteria:
(1) The character, interest or value of the area, property, or site as part of the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the city, state or nation;
(2) The location as a site of a significant historic event;
(3) The identification with a person or persons significant in our past;
(4) The exemplification by the area, property, or site of the cultural, economic or social heritage of the city, state or nation;
(5) The portrayal of a group of people in an era of history, characterized by a distinctive architectural style;
(6) The embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of a building type or architectural style;
(7) The embodiment of elements of architectural design, detail, materials or craftsmanship, which represent architecture of significant character;
(8) The identification as the work of an architect or master builder whose work has influenced the city, state or nation;
(9) The potential to yield information important in prehistory or history; and
(10) A unique location or singular physical characteristic representing an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood or of the city.
(Ord. 21-161, passed 12-13-2021)
(a) Purpose. The purpose of a variance is to provide limited relief from the requirements of this code in those cases where strict application of a particular requirement will create a practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship prohibiting the use of land in a manner otherwise allowed under this code. It is not intended that a variance be granted merely to remove inconveniences or financial burdens that the requirements of this code may impose on property owners in general. Variances are intended to address extraordinary, exceptional or unique situations that were not caused by the applicant’s act or omission.
(b) Variance review procedure. The review procedure for a variance shall be as follows:
(1) Step 1 - Application. The applicant shall submit an application in accordance with § 1214.01: Common Review Requirements, and with the provisions of this section.
(2) Step 2 - Staff review.
A. Upon determination that a variance application is complete, the Code Administrator shall distribute the application, and all related plans, to applicable city departments for internal review.
B. The Code Administrator will provide the ZBA with a summary of comments received from the city departments.
C. Upon receipt of comments, the applicant shall have the option to make revisions to the application and plans based on the comments prior to being forwarded to the ZBA or may request that the application be forwarded to the ZBA without revisions.
(3) Step 3 - ZBA Review and decision.
A. The ZBA shall hold a public hearing within 45 days of the filing of the variance application provided adequate notification is provided pursuant to § 1214.01(i).
B. In reviewing the application, the ZBA shall at a minimum, consider the review criteria of this section.
C. The ZBA may request that the applicant supply additional information that the Board deems necessary to review and evaluate the request for a variance.
D. In making its decision, the ZBA may approve, approve with modifications or supplementary conditions, or deny the application.
E. In making its decision, the ZBA shall make specific findings of fact based directly on the particular evidence presented that the reasons set forth in the application and as presented by the applicant during the public hearing, justify the approval, approval with modifications or supplementary conditions, or denial of the variance application that will make possible a reasonable use of the land, building, or structure.
F. Within 60 days of the close of the public hearing, the ZBA shall render a decision on the variance application. The Code Administrator shall notify the appellant in writing of the decision of the ZBA.
G. If the ZBA fails to make a recommendation within the established timeframe, or an extended timeframe approved by the applicant, the application shall be deemed approved.
H. The decision of the ZBA shall become effective immediately.
I. In approving a variance, the ZBA may impose conditions on the approval, the proposed use and the premises to be developed or used pursuant to such approval as it determines are required to be ensure compliance with the standards of this section and the purpose of this code. Any conditions established by the ZBA shall relate directly to the requested variance.
J. Any violation of the conditions of approval shall be a violation of this code, subject to the enforcement and penalties of Chapter 1244: Enforcement and Penalties.
(c) Review criteria.
(1) Area or dimensional variance. Where an applicant is seeking an area or dimensional variance, the following factors shall be considered and weighed by the ZBA to determine if a practical difficulty exists that would justify approval of the variance. However, no single factor listed below may control, and not all factors may be applicable in each case. Each case shall be determined on its own facts:
A. Whether special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land or structure involved and which are not applicable generally to other lands or structures in the same zoning district. Examples of such special conditions or circumstances are exceptional irregularity, narrowness, shallowness or steepness of the lot, or proximity to nonconforming and inharmonious uses, structures or conditions;
B. Whether the property in question will yield a reasonable return or whether there can be any beneficial use of the property without the variance;
C. Whether the variance is substantial and is the minimum necessary to make possible the reasonable use of the land or structures;
D. Whether the essential character of the neighborhood would be substantially altered or whether adjoining properties would suffer substantial detriment as a result of the variance;
E. Whether the variance would adversely affect the delivery of governmental services such as water, sewer, trash pickup;
F. Whether special conditions or circumstances exist as a result of actions of the applicant (actions of the applicant shall not include the purchase or acquisition of the property);
G. Whether the property owner’s predicament feasibly can be obviated through some method other than a variance;
H. Whether the spirit and intent behind the zoning requirement would be observed and substantial justice done by granting a variance;
I. Whether the granting of the variance requested will confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this regulation to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district; and
J. Whether a literal interpretation of the provisions of this code would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this code.
(2) Use variance. In order to grant a use variance, the ZBA shall determine that strict compliance with the terms of this code will result in unnecessary hardship to the applicant. The applicant must demonstrate such hardship by clear and convincing evidence that all of the following criteria are satisfied:
A. The property cannot be put to any economically viable use under any of the permitted uses in the zoning district in which the property is located;
B. The variance requested stems from a condition which is unique to the property at issue and not ordinarily found in the same zone or district;
C. The hardship condition is not created by actions of the applicant (actions of the applicant shall not include the purchase or acquisition of the property);
D. The granting of the variance will not adversely affect the rights of adjacent property owners or residents;
E. If there is an existing building on the lot, such building, due to its design, cannot be reasonably reused for a permitted use in the district;
F. The granting of the variance will not adversely affect the public health, safety or general welfare;
G. The variance will be consistent with the general spirit and intent of this code; and
H. The variance sought is the minimum that will afford relief to the applicant.
(d) Time limit.
(1) The applicant shall submit a completed application for a zoning permit and start work within one year of the date the variance was approved or the approval shall expire.
(2) Upon expiration of a variance approval, a new application, including all applicable fees, shall be required before a variance application will be reviewed.
(3) Upon written request, one extension of one year may be granted by the Code Administrator if the applicant can show good cause for a delay.
(4) As part of the variance approval, the ZBA may authorize alternative time limits for zoning permit issuance based on the scale of the proposed development.
(e) Appeals. Any person or entity claiming to be injured or aggrieved by any final action of the ZBA shall have the right to appeal the decision the Court of Common Pleas as provided in R.C. Chapters 2505 and 2506.
(Ord. 21-161, passed 12-13-2021)
(a) Purpose. A zoning permit shall be required in accordance with the provisions of this section in order to ensure that proposed development complies with the standards of this code, and to otherwise protect the public health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the city.
(b) Applicability.
(1) No building or other structure shall be erected, moved, altered or added to, nor shall any building, structure or land be used without a zoning permit issued by the Code Administrator.
(2) Any change in use within an existing building shall require a zoning permit with the exception that a change in tenancy or ownership of a residential dwelling unit shall not be required to receive a zoning permit.
(3) A zoning permit may be required for the establishment of certain temporary or accessory use as established in Chapter 1224: Accessory and Temporary Use Regulations.
(4) The use of vacant land shall require the issuance of a zoning permit.
(5) Unless otherwise specifically exempted in Chapter 1236: Sign Standards, signs shall require a zoning permit.
(6) Zoning permits shall be issued only in conformity with the provisions of this code unless the application is subject to an approval by the ZBA or Planning Commission providing for additional standards, conditions or modifications, in which case, the zoning permit shall be issued in conformity with the provisions of those approvals, as applicable.
(7) Failure to obtain a zoning permit shall be a violation of this code subject to the provisions of Chapter 1244: Enforcement and Penalties.
(c) Terminology. For the purposes of this code, the zoning permit review shall be an administrative review that may be applied to permits or certificates of other names (e.g., sign permits, temporary use permits, zoning occupancy permit and the like) if stated in this code. In such cases, the procedure of this section shall still apply.
(d) Zoning permit review procedure. The review procedure for a zoning permit shall be as follows.
(1) Step 1 - Application. The applicant shall submit an application in accordance with § 1214.01: Common Review Requirements, and with the provisions of this section.
(2) Step 2 - Code Administrator review and decision.
A. The Code Administrator may distribute the application to other staff members and other city departments to solicit comment on the zoning permit application.
B. For any zoning permit application for development or applicable activities in a special flood hazard area, the Code Administrator shall be required to also review and make a decision on the zoning permit application as it relates to any flood-related regulations.
C. Within 30 days after the application is determined to be complete, the Code Administrator shall make a decision either approving or denying the permit application. An extension on the decision may be granted with approval from the applicant. Where the proposed development is within a special flood hazard area, the Code Administrator shall be required to make a decision within the same timeframe.
D. Prior to finalizing approval of the application, the Code Administrator shall have the authority to provide comments to the applicant regarding necessary revisions to bring the application into full compliance. The application shall not be deemed formally approved until the applicant makes all of the appropriate changes and submits all necessary revised forms, maps and documents to the Code Administrator.
(e) Review criteria. In order to approve any zoning permit, the Code Administrator shall determine the following:
(1) The application complies with all applicable provisions of this code and the applicable zoning district; and
(2) The application complies with all approved plans, conditions, or other development approvals.
(f) Time limit and abandoned or suspended work.
(1) The applicant shall obtain an approved building permit, and begin construction, within one year of the date the zoning permit is approved or the approval shall be revoked. The date of approval shall be the date the Code Administrator provides a signed copy of the permit to the applicant.
(2) For activities that do not require a building permit, the activity shall have been substantially begun within one year of approval and is thereafter pursued to completion, as determined by the Code Administrator.
(3) The deadlines in divisions (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this section may be reduced if the work is mandated by this code or by order of the Code Administrator or ZBA. In such cases, the deadline for construction shall be noted on the zoning permit.
(4) Time limits for permitted temporary uses and structures shall be as authorized in § 1224.02: Temporary Uses and Structures. An approval of a zoning permit for a temporary use shall include the approved start and end dates for the proposed temporary use.
(5) If construction activities for which a zoning permit has been issued are abandoned or suspended for a period of six months after the time of commencing the work, the zoning permit approval shall be revoked. ABANDONMENT shall be defined as the lack of building activity or progress towards achieving the scope of work defined in the zoning permit.
(6) Upon written request, up to two extensions of six months may be granted by the Code Administrator if the applicant can show good cause for a delay.
(7) The Code Administrator shall notify the application of the revocation of a zoning permit including notice that further work as described in the canceled permit shall not proceed unless and until a new zoning permit has been obtained or extension granted.
(8) Upon revocation of a zoning permit approval, a new application, including all applicable fees, shall be required before a new zoning permit application will be reviewed.
(9) The above time limits shall not apply if alternative time limits have been approved by Planning Commission or City Council as part of a site plan or Planned Unit Development approval.
(10) For the purposes of this section, construction is deemed to have begun when all necessary excavation and piers or footings for one or more principal buildings included in the plan shall have been completed.
(g) Revoking a zoning permit. A zoning permit shall be revocable, if among other things, the actual development activity does not conform to the terms of the application and permit granted thereon. In the event of the revocation of a permit, an appeal may be taken to the ZBA in accordance with § 1214.11: Appeals, of this code.
(h) Appeals. Any person or entity claiming to be injured or aggrieved by any final action of the Code Administrator shall have the right to appeal the decision to the ZBA as established in § 1214.11: Appeals.
(Ord. 21-161, passed 12-13-2021)
(a) Purpose. This section sets out the procedures to follow when a person claims to have been aggrieved or affected by an administrative decision made in the administration or enforcement of this code.
(b) Applicability.
(1) An appeal may be made regarding any administrative decision made in the administration and enforcement of this code including administrative decisions by the Planning Commission or Code Administrator.
(2) An appeal may not be made to the ZBA when the Planning Commission is making a recommendation to City Council as part of a legislative action such as a code text or map amendment.
(c) Initiation. Appeals shall be initiated by the person aggrieved or affected by any order, decision, determination or interpretation made by the authority having jurisdiction who is charged with the administration or enforcement of this code.
(d) Appeals review procedure. The review procedure for appeals shall be as follows:
(1) Step 1 - Submission of appeal. Within 30 days of the administrative order, decision, determination or interpretation, the person appealing the decision or their authorized agent shall submit all required information to the Code Administrator in accordance § 1214.01: Common Review Requirements.
(2) Step 2 - Forwarding of the record to the ZBA. Upon receiving the written appeal of an administrative decision or determination, the Code Administrator shall transmit the written appeal with all papers, documents and other materials related to the appealed decision or determination to the ZBA. This material shall constitute the record of the appeal.
(3) Step 3 - ZBA review and decision.
A. The ZBA shall hold a public hearing within 45 days of the filing of the appeal provided adequate notification is provided pursuant to § 1214.01(i).
B. In reviewing the appeal, the ZBA shall at a minimum, consider the review criteria of this section.
C. Within 60 days of the close of the public hearing, the ZBA shall render a decision on the appeal. The Code Administrator shall notify the appellant in writing of the decision of the Board.
D. If the ZBA fails to make a recommendation within the established timeframe, or an extended timeframe approved by the applicant, the application shall be deemed denied.
E. The decision of the ZBA shall become effective immediately.
(e) Review criteria. A decision or determination shall not be reversed or modified unless there is competent, material and substantial evidence in the record that the decision or determination fails to comply with either the procedural or substantive requirements of this code.
(f) Stay. A properly submitted appeal shall stay all administrative proceedings by the city in furtherance of the action appealed, unless the Code Administrator certifies to the ZBA that a stay would cause imminent peril to life or property, in which case the administrative proceedings shall not be stayed unless a restraining order is granted by the ZBA or by a court of competent jurisdiction, for good cause shown.
(g) Appeals of ZBA decisions. Any person or entity claiming to be injured or aggrieved by any final action of the ZBA shall have the right to appeal the decision the Court of Common Pleas as provided in R.C. Chapters 2505 and 2506.
(Ord. 21-161, passed 12-13-2021)
It is the intent of this code that all questions of interpretation related to the administration and enforcement of this code shall be first presented to the Code Administrator, and that such questions shall be presented to the ZBA only on appeal from the decision of the Code Administrator. Such appeals shall be in accordance with § 1214.11: Appeals.
(Ord. 21-161, passed 12-13-2021)