Skip to code content (skip section selection)
Compare to:
Montgomery County Overview
Montgomery County Code
Montgomery County Zoning Ordinance (2014)
COMCOR - Code of Montgomery County Regulations
COMCOR Code of Montgomery County Regulations
FORWARD
CHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 1A. STRUCTURE OF COUNTY GOVERNMENT - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 2. ADMINISTRATION - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 2B. AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 3. AIR QUALITY CONTROL - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 3A. ALARMS - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 5. ANIMAL CONTROL - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 8. BUILDINGS - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 8A. CABLE COMMUNICATIONS - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 10B. COMMON OWNERSHIP COMMUNITIES - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 11. CONSUMER PROTECTION - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 11A. CONDOMINIUMS - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 11B. CONTRACTS AND PROCUREMENT - REGULATIONS
Loading...
Loading...
CHAPTER 13. DETENTION CENTERS AND REHABILITATION FACILITIES - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 15. EATING AND DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 16. ELECTIONS - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 17. ELECTRICITY - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 18A. ENERGY POLICY - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 19. EROSION, SEDIMENT CONTROL AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 19A. ETHICS - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 20 FINANCE - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 21 FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICES - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 22. FIRE SAFETY CODE - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 22A. FOREST CONSERVATION - TREES - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 23A. GROUP HOMES - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 24. HEALTH AND SANITATION - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 24A. HISTORIC RESOURCES PRESERVATION - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 24B. HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATIONS - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 25. HOSPITALS, SANITARIUMS, NURSING AND CARE HOMES - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 25A. HOUSING, MODERATELY PRICED - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 25B. HOUSING POLICY - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 26. HOUSING AND BUILDING MAINTENANCE STANDARDS - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 27. HUMAN RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 27A. INDIVIDUAL WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 29. LANDLORD-TENANT RELATIONS - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 30. LICENSING AND REGULATIONS GENERALLY - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 30C. MOTOR VEHICLE TOWING AND IMMOBILIZATION ON PRIVATE PROPERTY - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 31. MOTOR VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 31A. MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR AND TOWING REGISTRATION - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 31B. NOISE CONTROL - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 31C. NEW HOME BUILDER AND SELLER REGISTRATION AND WARRANTY - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 33. PERSONNEL AND HUMAN RESOURCES - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 33B. PESTICIDES - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 35. POLICE - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 36. POND SAFETY - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 38A. RADIO, TELEVISION AND ELECTRICAL APPLIANCE INSTALLATION AND REPAIRS - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 40. REAL PROPERTY - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 41. RECREATION AND RECREATION FACILITIES - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 41A. RENTAL ASSISTANCE - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 42A. RIDESHARING AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 44. SCHOOLS AND CAMPS - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 44A. SECONDHAND PERSONAL PROPERTY - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 45. SEWERS, SEWAGE DISPOSAL AND DRAINAGE - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 47. VENDORS - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 48. SOLID WASTES - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 49. STREETS AND ROADS - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 50. SUBDIVISION OF LAND - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 51 SWIMMING POOLS - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 51A. TANNING FACILITIES - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 52. TAXATION - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 53. TAXICABS - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 53A. TENANT DISPLACEMENT - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 54. TRANSIENT LODGING FACILITIES - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 55. TREE CANOPY - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 56. URBAN RENEWAL AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 56A. VIDEO GAMES - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 57. WEAPONS - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 59. ZONING - REGULATIONS
CHAPTER 60. SILVER SPRING, BETHESDA, WHEATON AND MONTGOMERY HILLS PARKING LOT DISTRICTS - REGULATIONS
MISCELLANEOUS MONTGOMERY COUNTY REGULATIONS
TABLE 1 Previous COMCOR Number to Current COMCOR Number
TABLE 2 Executive Regulation Number to Current COMCOR Number
TABLE 3 Executive Order Number to Current COMCOR Number
INDEX BY AGENCY
INDEX BY SUBJECT
County Attorney Opinions and Advice of Counsel
Loading...
11B.00.01.07 Minority Owned Business Contracting
7.1   Purpose
   The purpose of 11B.00.01.07 is to establish procedures to facilitate the goal of the County Government to remedy the effects of discrimination by awarding a percentage of County contracts, including contract modifications and renewals, with a dollar value of $10,000 or more to minority owned businesses (MFD owned business or MFD), as defined in Chapter 11B of the County Code, in proportion to the availability of MFD owned businesses to perform work under County contracts.
7.2   Policy
   7.2.1   The Director, with the assistance of Using Departments and employees involved in contracting and purchasing, must actively and aggressively recruit certified MFD owned businesses for which a goal has been set to provide goods, construction, and services, including professional services, for the performance of governmental functions to facilitate the MFD goal of the County. Procurements less than or equal to $10,000, grants that are appropriated by the County Council to specific grantees, utilities, intragovernmental procurements, and certain intergovernmental procurements including certain bridge contracts identified by the Director are excluded from the base against which the goal is measured.
   7.2.2    Businesses that are certified as a minority business enterprise under State procurement law and certain non-profit entities organized to promote the interests of persons with a disability are eligible to be certified as an MFD business in accordance with these regulations. Certification is subject to the graduation provisions of Section 7.4.5.
   7.2.3    These regulations are the County's exclusive procedure for the certification, recertification and decertification of MFD owned businesses.
   7.2.4    Using Department Heads should seek the advice and concurrence of the Director in the development of internal operating procedures to implement the provisions of this procedure.
7.3   General
   7.3.1    In 11B.00.01.07 the term “relevant geographic market area” has the same meaning as it has in Chapter 11B. The term “MFD group” or “group of MFD owned businesses” has the same definition as “socially or economically disadvantaged group” in Chapter 11B.
   7.3.2    To qualify to participate in the MFD subcontracting program under Section 7.3.3, an MFD owned business must:
      7.3.2.1   belong to an MFD group for which a goal has been set under Section 7.3.4 in the purchasing category and source selection method covering the work that is the subject of the subcontract; and
      7.3.2.2   be certified as an MFD owned business under Section 7.4.
   7.3.3    MFD Subcontracting Program.
      7.3.3.1   Unless the context indicates otherwise, in Section 11B.00.01.07,
         (a)   contract means a contract identified by Using Departments or the Director as having an estimated dollar value of $50,000 or more, including renewals; and
         (b)   contractor means a contractor that:
            (1)   is not a certified MFD owned business; or
            (2)   if the contractor is a certified MFD owned business, the contractor does not belong to an MFD group for which a goal had been set in the purchasing category covering significant work to be undertaken in the contract.
      7.3.3.2   A contractor must subcontract a minimum percentage (as determined by the Director) of the contract price to certified MFD owned businesses that are eligible to participate in the subcontracting program. To be eligible, a certified MFD owned business must have a goal set under Section 7.3.4 in a purchasing category and under a source selection method covering the work to be performed under the subcontract. The Director applies the goals established by the CAO under Section 7.3.4.8(d) for each purchasing and source selection category covering a substantial amount of work to be done under the contract to set the minimum percentage of the contract which the contractor must subcontract to certified MFD owned businesses.
      7.3.3.3   Each contractor must submit a Subcontractor Performance Plan prior to undertaking performance under the contract, or at such earlier time as required by the Director. An MFD Subcontractor Performance Plan must:
         (a)   identify each MFD subcontractor;
         (b)   identify the amount the contractor has agreed to pay each MFD subcontractor;
         (c)   provide a copy of the language used in each MFD subcontract which requires the use of binding arbitration with a neutral arbitrator to resolve disputes between the contractor and the MFD subcontractor. The language must describe how the costs of dispute resolution will be apportioned; the apportionment must not, in the judgment of the Director, attempt to penalize an MFD subcontractor for filing an arbitration claim; and
         (d)   be made a part of the contract between the contractor and the County. County approval of the Subcontractor Performance Plan must not establish a contractual relationship between the County and the MFD subcontractor.
      7.3.3.4   The contract between the contractor and the County must require:
         (a)   the contractor to notify the Director of any proposed change to the Subcontractor Performance Plan;
         (b)   the contractor to provide in each subcontract with an MFD owned business a provision requiring the use of binding arbitration to resolve disputes between the contractor and the MFD owned business;
         (c)   that failure to submit documentation showing compliance with the Subcontracting Performance Plan is grounds for imposing liquidated damages unless failure to comply with the Plan is the result of an arbitration decision in favor of the contractor or a waiver granted by the Director. Liquidated damages under this provision should equal the difference between all amounts the contractor has agreed under its plan to pay MFD subcontractors and all amounts actually paid MFD subcontractors considering any relevant waiver or arbitrator’s decision; and
         (d)   that failure to show compliance with a Subcontractor Performance Plan must result in finding the contractor nonresponsible for purposes of future procurements with the County during the next 3 years.
      7.3.3.5   The Director may waive in whole or in part an MFD subcontracting requirement imposed under Section 7.3.3 if the Director finds that:
         (a)   it is unusually difficult or impossible for the contractor to meet a subcontracting requirement because, for example, a qualified MFD owned business is not available for subcontracting or the contractor’s good-faith efforts to subcontract with available MFD owned businesses have failed;
         (b)   reasonable grounds exist to waive a subcontracting requirement because, for example, the subcontracting requirement would undermine the purpose of a contract for personal services, subcontracting would be inconsistent with the requirements for confidentiality, or the contract is awarded under an emergency procurement; or
         (c)   the contractor belongs to a class of nonprofit entities for which the Director has determined that it would be impractical to require participation in the MFD Subcontracting Program.
      7.3.3.6   The Director has sole discretion to determine the estimated value of a contract and may consider the value of any modifications or renewals.
   7.3.4    The MFD subcontracting goal is set as follows:
      7.3.4.1   By September 1 of each year the Director must determine for the previous fiscal year the availability of each group of MFD owned businesses with one or more employees. The Director must use the most recent report that the County Executive must submit under Section11B-61(b) of the County Code to determine the availability of MFD owned businesses in the relevant geographic market area to perform work under County contracts.
      7.3.4.2   Fiscal year means July 1 through June 30.
      7.3.4.3   The Director must state the availability by source selection method for each group of MFD owned businesses as a percentage of all businesses available to perform work under County contracts awarded through formal solicitation in the purchasing categories of:
         (a)   construction;
         (b)   goods;
         (c)   professional services; and
         (d)   other services
      7.3.4.4   The Director may set the availability of Disabled owned businesses at 0.75 percent in each purchasing category. Not for profit entities that are certified as MFD owned businesses are included in the Disabled owned business group.
      7.3.4.5   The Director must determine by source selection method the percentage of contract dollars awarded to each group of MFD owned businesses as prime contractors and subcontractors in the purchasing categories of:
         (a)   construction;
         (b)   goods;
         (c)   professional services; and
         (d)   other services.
      7.3.4.6   The Director must determine by source selection method the disparity between the dollar value of contracts and subcontracts awarded to each group of MFD owned businesses in each purchasing category identified in Section 7.3.4.5 with the availability of that group in each purchasing category by source selection method. The Director must use, to the extent practicable, a methodology compatible with the methodology used to determine disparity in the most recent report submitted under Section 11B- 61(b) of the County Code.
      7.3.4.7   By September 1 of each year the Director must submit to the CAO a report setting forth the determinations made under Sections 7.3.4.3 through 7.3.4.6.
      7.3.4.8   After receiving the Director’s report, the CAO must set by September 30 of each year MFD subcontracting goals for the current fiscal year.
         (a)   In setting MFD subcontracting goals the CAO must determine by source selection method if the County has significantly underutilized each group of MFD owned businesses in each purchasing category. The CAO makes this determination under each source selection method by considering the disparity between the availability of each group of MFD owned businesses in each purchasing category with the contract dollars awarded to each group of MFD owned businesses in each purchasing category.
         (b)   If the CAO determines that a group of MFD owned businesses in a specific purchasing category under a particular source selection method has been significantly underutilized, the CAO must set an MFD goal for that group in the applicable purchasing category for that source selection method. The goal must be related to the availability by source selection method of the group of MFD owned businesses in the purchasing category.
         (c)   If the CAO determines that a group of MFD owned businesses in a specific purchasing category under a particular source selection method has not been significantly underutilized, the CAO must not set an MFD goal in the applicable purchasing category for that source selection method. The CAO, nevertheless, may set a goal for an MFD group in a purchasing and source selection category (even though a finding of significant underutilization has not been found) if, in at least one out of the last 4 years, the CAO had determined the MFD group had been significantly underutilized and during that year a goal had not been set for the MFD group in the applicable purchasing and source selection category.
         (d)   The CAO must set for each purchasing category for which an MFD goal has been set an overall MFD subcontracting goal that contractors must meet under Section 7.3.3. The overall MFD subcontracting goal for each purchasing category must be related to the availability of all groups of MFD owned businesses for which a goal is set in that purchasing category.
7.4   Certification of MFD Owned Businesses
   7.4.1    The Director may certify an entity as an MFD owned business if the business is certified as a minority business enterprise under Federal or State procurement law, or other non-self-certifying public entity certification program, as determined to be acceptable by the Director.
   7.4.2   If the business is a not-for-profit entity organized to promote the interests of physically and mentally disabled individuals, the Director must determine whether:
      7.4.2.1   the not for profit entity is certified as a minority business enterprise under Federal or State procurement law, or other non-self-certifying public entity certification program that the Director has determined to be acceptable; and
      7.4.2.2   at least 51% of the individuals used by the not for profit entity to perform the work or manufacture the goods contracted for by the County are individuals with a physical or mental disability.
   7.4.3   The Director must conduct a review to determine whether a business may be certified as an MFD owned business. This review must include an evaluation of the documentation submitted by the business on an MFD Application form. The Director may also include a site visit to the offices of a not for profit entity. The Director may review any of the following:
      7.4.3.1   Certifications issued by the Federal or State governments, or by another public entity, provided that the public entity’s program is not based on vendor self-certification.
      7.4.3.2   Employment records, health records, and/or educational records of the employees of a not for profit entity seeking MFD certification.
      7.4.3.3   Other relevant information concerning the operation of a not for profit entity.
   7.4.4    A request for certification or recertification as an MFD business may be denied by the Director for any of the following reasons:
      7.4.4.1   Failure to demonstrate that the business is a certified minority business enterprise under Federal or State procurement law, or through another non-self-certifying public entity certification program determined to be acceptable by the Director.
      7.4.4.2   Failure to provide sufficient and timely information for the Director to make a certification or recertification determination.
      7.4.4.3   Refusal to permit an on-site inspection by the Director.
      7.4.4.4   Failure to comply with a request by the Director for information or access to records.
      7.4.4.5   Graduation of the MFD owned business.
   7.4.5    Certification as an MFD owned business by the County may be revoked for any one of the following reasons:
      7.4.5.1   Fraud, deceit or misrepresentation in obtaining certification.
      7.4.5.2   Failure to report in writing to the Director within 30 days of the date of the occurrence of any changes in the status of the certified MFD owned business that are relevant to its certification.
      7.4.5.3   Failure to demonstrate at the request of the Director that the entity continues to be an MFD owned business.
   7.4.6    Certification is subject to the graduation provisions of this Section. The Director must not certify an entity as a MFD owned business for a period of time that exceeds 5 years. The Director, however, may certify a business as an MFD owned business for 8 years if during the first 5 years of certification, the MFD owned business:
      7.4.6.1   has not received at least
         (a)   4 subcontracts awarded under Chapter 11B of the County Code; and
         (b)   the cumulative value of the subcontracts has not exceeded $120,000.
      7.4.6.2   The MFD graduation requirement established under this subsection begins on December 1, 1993, and is only effective prospectively.
7.5   Responsibilities
   7.5.1    Director
      7.5.1.1   The Director is responsible for contacts with businesses to identify, encourage and coordinate participation of MFD owned businesses in the procurement process, including certification. This includes notification to all businesses of prospective procurement opportunities by electronic communication based on the most recently available business directories, encouragement of MFD owned business participation in procurement, as prime contractors or subcontractors, procurement system education and information for all businesses, and referrals to resources such as technical consultants, sureties and financing.
      7.5.1.2   The Director maintains up-to-date mailing lists, and other references of County certified MFD owned businesses for use by Using Departments, contractors, and for public information.
      7.5.1.3   The Director provides Using Departments with a list of certified MFD owned businesses who have stated an interest in providing services required by the Using Department.
      7.5.1.4   The Director assists Using Departments, as needed, in developing internal operating procedures to use certified MFD owned businesses in accordance with the provisions of this section.
      7.5.1.5   The Director cooperates with other governments and governmental agencies in exchanging information regarding certified MFD owned businesses.
      7.5.1.6   The Director distributes to potential prime contractors for whom a goal has not been set a current list of certified MFD owned businesses with a requirement that one or more be contacted if the work is being subcontracted.
      7.5.1.7   The Director should ensure that contract administrators receive appropriate guidance in implementing the provisions of these regulations.
   7.5.2    Using Departments
      7.5.2.1   The Using Departments should request and use the most recent list of certified MFD owned businesses furnished by the Director to encourage certified MFD owned businesses for whom a goal has been set to response to Requests for Proposals, Requests for Expressions of Interest, and all other procurements.
      7.5.2.2   When inviting proposals for services with a dollar value of less than $50,000, whether by RFP, REOI, Mini-Contract or any other source selection method of procurement, the Using Departments must ensure an effort is made to afford certified MFD owned businesses for whom a goal has been set an opportunity to participate in the award of the contract. Periodically, or at the request of the Director, Using Departments must provide to the Director written documentation including contract documents that indicate the results of efforts to provide an opportunity for certified MFD owned businesses for whom a goal has been set to submit proposals. The Using Departments should also cooperate with the Director in efforts to encourage MFD contractor participation by, among other things, establishing minority business procurement objectives consistent with Chapter 11B of the County Code and by developing and implementing techniques to encourage greater MFD owned business participation.
      7.5.2.3   The Using Departments must notify the Director when an Invitation for Bid, a Request for Proposal or a Request for Expression of Interest is expected to have a dollar value of $50,000 or more. Notification should be as early as possible, but not later than the Using Department's official request to the Director to commence a procurement action.
      7.5.2.4   The Using Departments should develop, with the advice and concurrence of the Director, internal operating procedures to implement the provisions of this section.
7.6   Procedures for Certification/Recertification of MFD Businesses
   7.6.1    The Director, upon request from a business or at the Director's initiative, provides a MFD Application form to the business. To ensure timely recertification, the certified MFD owned businesses should file a MFD Application form at least 60 days prior to expiration of certification.
   7.6.2    The business returns the MFD Application form to the Director in accordance with the form’s instructions.
   7.6.3    The Director reviews the MFD Application form submitted to determine, in accordance with this procedure, whether the business should be certified or recertified as an MFD owned business. Upon determination of eligibility as a MFD owned business, the Director certifies the business as an MFD owned business.
   7.6.4    If a business is not certified or recertification is denied, the Director informs the applicant, in writing, of the denial, the reasons for denial and the right to request reconsideration of the decision to the Director within 5 days of the date of the decision. This notice of denial should indicate that the business may request a hearing.
   7.6.5    The Director reviews the request for reconsideration and may conduct a hearing if appropriate. The Director makes a written determination and finding regarding the reconsideration request. The Director must then send a copy of the decision to the CAO who may approve, revise, or remand the decision. If the CAO takes no action within 5 working days, the decision of the Director becomes final.
   7.6.6    After the decision becomes final, the Director must inform the business making the reconsideration request, in writing, of the decision and the right to appeal to the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland, pursuant to Title 7 of the Maryland Rules of Procedure governing judicial review of decisions of administrative agencies.
7.7   Procedures for Decertification
   7.7.1    The Director, based upon a written determination that there are grounds for concluding that the entity is no longer entitled to be certified as an MFD owned business, makes a proposal to revoke the certification. The entity must be notified, in writing, of this proposed decertification.
   7.7.2    The entity may submit any written information to the Director within the time limits specified by the Director, which must not be less than 3 working days of receipt of notification of the proposed decertification.
   7.7.3    The Director must review the proposed decertification and any information submitted by the entity and decide whether to revoke the certification after the expiration of the time specified by the Director for submitting information. The Director must inform the entity of the decision, in writing, and the right to request a reconsideration of the decision within 5 days.
   7.7.4    The entity must submit to the Director a written reconsideration request regarding the decertification within the 5 day limit or waives all rights of appeal.
   7.7.5   If there is a reconsideration request, the Director may conduct a hearing, if appropriate, concerning the decertification. The Director makes a written determination and finding regarding the decertification request. The Director must then send a copy of the decision to the CAO who may approve, revise, or remand the decision. If the CAO takes no action within 5 working days, the decision of the Director becomes final.
   7.7.6    After the decision becomes final, the Director must inform the entity making the reconsideration request, in writing, of the decision and the right to appeal to the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland, pursuant to Title 7 of the Maryland Rules of Procedure governing judicial review of decisions of administrative agencies.
7.8   Special Solicitation Requirements
   7.8.1    The Director must include in all formal competitive solicitations (and resulting contracts) with an estimated value of $50,000 or greater MFD contracting conditions in a form created by the Director and approved by the Office of the County Attorney.
   7.8.2    These conditions must include the following provisions.
      7.8.2.1   Notice of the Montgomery County MFD contracting policy and associated contracting goals.
      7.8.2.2   A requirement that the offeror subcontract with certified MFD owned businesses in a manner consistent with Section 7.3.3, and specification as to how the offeror may demonstrate the basis for the Director to grant, in whole or in part, a waiver of the MFD subcontracting goal.
      7.8.2.3   Notice of the requirement to comply with the MFD Subcontractor Performance Plan, including binding arbitration to resolve disputes with MFD subcontracts and imposition of liquidated damages for failure to comply with the MFD Subcontractor Performance Plan.
      7.8.2.4   A specification of all documentation required to be submitted by the contractor, including information required under Section 7.9 which the Director requires the contractor to submit, and time requirements for those submissions as determined by the Director.
      7.8.2.5   Notice of non-eligibility and disqualification for award for failure to submit required documentation or meet MFD goals, unless waived.
      7.8.2.6   Limitations on substitutions or other non-use of designated MFD subcontractors.
      7.8.2.7   Notice of enforcement procedures, including penalties and actions which may result from non-compliance.
      7.8.2.8   Statement of records requirements for contractors, including types of records required and length of time the records must be maintained.
   7.8.3   The Director must review and evaluate procurement procedures and solicitation requirements to determine the effect those procedures and requirements may have on the ability of MFD owned businesses to be competitive. The Director may also take necessary action to remove any artificial barriers to competition found to exist. Those actions may include:
      7.8.3.1   Requiring Using Departments to take steps to assist contractors in making timely submissions of subcontracting plans.
      7.8.3.2   Considering past compliance with the County minority business procurement program in determining contractor responsibility.
      7.8.3.3   Adjusting evaluation criteria or method of award decisions and lowering or eliminating insurance, bonding and experience requirements.
      7.8.3.4   Requiring the minority procurement officer to report in writing to the Director those solicitations and contracts which adversely affect MFD participation and those actions by existing contractors which do not comply in good faith with approved MFD subcontractor plans.
7.9   Reporting Requirements
   The Director may require each contractor to provide the County with information concerning utilization by the contractor of MFD owned businesses in private and government contracts. The Director may also require each certified MFD owned business to provide the County with information concerning its utilization by non-MFD owned businesses in private and government contracts.
7.10 Monitoring Procedures
   7.10.1    The contract administrator in conjunction with the minority procurement officer must monitor all contracts subject to MFD participation to ensure compliance by prime contractors with the requirements of these regulations. Monitoring may include site visits, audits of contractors' books and records relative to County contracts, the submission of copies of invoices from the minority subcontractor to the prime contractor, submission of Contract Monitoring Reports at scheduled intervals during the life of the contract, and other procedures that the Director may require.
   7.10.2   The Director must notify certified MFD owned businesses of their responsibility to report to the minority procurement office in a timely manner any changes in status that affects the entity’s eligibility for certification as an MFD owned business. The failure of the MFD owned business to report any relevant change in a timely manner constitutes sufficient grounds for decertification.
11B.00.01.08 Contract Payments
8.1   General Payment Principles
   8.1.1    All contracts must specifically provide for methods and timing of payments to be made to the contractor. These provisions should be as detailed as possible, specifying all conditions which must be met by the contractor in order to submit a request for payment and to determine whether a payment is due.
   8.1.2   Except as otherwise authorized by these regulations, payment may be made only after contractor performance has occurred to justify the payments under the contract (e.g., the contractor has incurred a cost and submitted an invoice for an item for which the contractor appears to be entitled to cost reimbursement; the contractor appears to have performed services for which a fair value has been specified as a part of the contract; the contractor appears to be entitled to a progress payment in accordance with the contract upon determination of that extent of performance; goods have been delivered and inspected by the Using Department, appear to be acceptable, and an invoice has been submitted for payment in accordance with the contract).
   8.1.3    Certifying whether payments are due the contractor is the responsibility of the Using Department and must be done as expeditiously as possible. The Using Department may be required to justify any failure to expedite payments upon inquiry by the Director.
8.2   Incentive Payments
   Contracts may provide for incentive payments in exchange for enhanced contractor performance beyond contract specifications, terms and conditions.
8.3   Progress or Partial Payments
   The approval and recommendation for payment by a Using Department of an invoice submitted by contractor for progress payments or partial payments pursuant to the terms of a contract constitute certification that a contractor has performed in accordance with the contract and has earned the payment approved, that the Using Department has performed all inspection necessary, including testing, to insure proper performance, and the Using Department accepts the contractor's performance as complying with the contract for purposes of earning the contract payment. Certification of approval for a progress or partial payment does not constitute waiver of any rights of the County against the contractor for failure to perform pursuant to any of the terms, conditions, or specifications of the contract.
8.4   Advance Payments
   A contract may provide for advance payment if the advance payment is part of a commercially acceptable practice as in the case of equipment and software maintenance, periodical subscriptions, registrations, travel, catering service, licensing fees, and insurance premiums. In other cases, the Director of Finance and the Director may approve an advance payment if they determine that unique circumstances exist which indicate that an advance payment is in the best interest of the County.
8.5   Retention
   8.5.1    In contracts for which retention is provided (generally construction contracts), Using Departments must insure that all retention amounts provided for in the contract are maintained by the County. Partial reduction or final release of retention must be authorized, in writing, by the Director.
   8.5.2    Any changes to levels of retention provided in the contract must be approved by the Director, in writing, before the change in the contract retention may become effective.
   8.5.3   If a contractor has furnished 100% payment security and 100% performance security under a contract for construction, retainage must comply with the requirements established under the Maryland Little Miller Act.
8.6   Payment of Interest
   If interest is payable by the County under Section 11B-34 of the Code, the amount of the interest is calculated by using the interest rate paid by 5 year U.S. Treasury Bills as of the date interest first begins to accrue under Section 11B-34.
8.7   Credit and Debit Card Procurements
   Credit and debit cards may be utilized as authorized by the Director of Finance. The authorization of the Director of Finance must designate the following:
   8.7.1   Each person authorized to use the credit card;
   8.7.2   The monetary limits for any single expenditure and class of expenditures that may be incurred under the credit card;
   8.7.3   An itemization or description of all allowable purchases;
   8.7.4   A statement of all limitations with respect to use of the card;
   8.7.5   A statement of any limitations with respect to date of usage of the card or duration of authorization.
11B.00.01.09 Bonds and Insurance
9.1   Bonds
   9.1.1    Exemption from Bond Requirements
      Bond requirements contained in these regulations are not applicable to public works participation agreements (e.g., stormwater agreements, road participation agreements) and other regulatory non-procurement agreements as designated from time to time by the County Attorney.
   9.1.2.    Director Review
      9.1.2.1   The Director must review and approve the bond requirements in a solicitation:
         (a)   for construction contracts that have a value of less than $100,000; and
         (b)   all non-construction contracts.
      9.1.2.2   In reviewing bonds and bond requirements, the Director must consider the impacts on competition and costs, particularly impacts on MFD firms. The impacts must be balanced with the needs served by the bond requirements, which include appropriate security for performance and other assurances of responsibility.
      9.1.2.3   The Director has the right to approve, disapprove, or require changes to any instrument offered as a bond.
   9.1.3    Minimum Requirements
      9.1.3.1   All bonds must meet the following minimum requirements:
         (a)    The surety company issuing the bond must be qualified and licensed to do business in the State of Maryland.
         (b)   The attorney-in-fact on the bond document must be properly authorized to bind the surety, which authorization may be documented by a power of attorney submitted with the bond, or the attorney-in-fact must be registered with the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland.
         (c)    The obligee of the bond must be "Montgomery County, Maryland", or any additional or other obligee required by the County.
         (d)   Any surety or insurance company that issues a bond in favor of the County consents to personal jurisdiction in the State of Maryland and, in the event that any legal action is filed upon the bond, venue shall lie exclusively in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland.
         (e)   The bond must be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Maryland.
      9.1.3.2   Under State law, a construction contract that exceeds $100,000 must require the contractor to provide payment security in an amount equal to at least 50 percent of the total amount payable under the contract and for performance security in an appropriate amount. For construction contracts that do not exceed $100,000, the Director may require payment security or performance security.
   9.1.4    Substitutions
      Substitutions for bonds may be permitted only with permission of the County Attorney or pursuant to guidelines issued by the County Attorney. Substitutions may include letters of credit, cash deposits and other forms of security. Personal sureties are not acceptable substitutes for bond requirements. Any letter of credit accepted by the County Attorney must contain at least the following terms:
      9.1.4.1   The letter of credit must be presentable to an institution located within the State of Maryland.
      9.1.4.2   The issuer of the letter of credit must consent to the letter of credit being governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Maryland.
      9.1.4.3   The issuer of the letter of credit must consent to personal jurisdiction in the State of Maryland; and
      9.1.4.4   In the event that any legal action is filed upon the bond, venue shall lie exclusively in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland.
9.2   Insurance
   General insurance requirements for contracts are specified by the Office of the County Attorney in the mandatory clauses. Requests for variances from those requirements must be approved by the Director. The Division of Risk Management, Department of Finance, must be consulted on all matters pertaining to insurance, particularly insurance amounts.
11B.00.01.10 Contract Cost and Pricing Principles
10.1   Fair and Reasonable Price Determination
   Before executing a contract or contract modification, the Director must make a final determination that prices to be paid by the County are fair and reasonable. In making this determination, the Director should consider the Using Department’s price analysis and, if obtained, cost or pricing data.
   The Director has authority to require that contract cost or pricing principles be followed by Using Departments. In addition, the Director may require a price analysis by Using Departments, particularly in the certification of fair and reasonable prices as required by these regulations.
   10.1.1   Price Analysis
   Before making a recommendation for award, a Using Department must make a price analysis to determine that the prices are fair and reasonable. In making the price analysis, a Using Department should consider one or more of the following factors:
      10.1.1.1    Prior award price for the goods or services being procured;
      10.1.1.2    Prices contained in other offers responding to that solicitation;
      10.1.1.3    Costs estimated for the procurement prior to the receipt of offers;
      10.1.1.4   Commercial market prices and other commercial practices relating to costs;
      10.1.1.5   Prices paid by other public entities for similar goods or services; or
      10.1.1.6   Cost analysis which separates components of the offer and allocates costs among those components.
   10.1.2   The Director may issue additional factors to the Using Departments for use in making a price analysis.
10.2    Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data
   10.2.1   An offeror or contractor must submit cost or pricing data, or both, in a form prescribed by the Director prior to approval of:
      10.2.1.1    A competitively negotiated contract valued at more than $100,000;
      10.2.1.2    A non-competitively negotiated contract valued at more than $50,000;
      10.2.1.3    Any contract modification for which the price adjustment is expected to exceed $50,000 except contract modifications that are fully in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract; or
      10.2.1.4    Any other contract or contract modification, as may be required by the CAO or Director.
   10.2.2    When Cost or Pricing Data is required:
      10.2.2.1    Each contractor or offeror must at the request of the Director submit, in a form required by the Director, a certificate showing the data for the proposed work to be done, including work to be done by a subcontractor. The offeror or contractor must submit a certification that the data submitted are accurate, complete and current.
      10.2.2.2    The contract or contract modification document must state that the price to the County, including profit or fee, may be adjusted by the Director to exclude from the price any sums determined by the Director to be allocable to inaccurate, incomplete or outdated cost or pricing data.
   10.2.3    When a prime contractor is authorized to expend appropriated funds through subcontractors in the performance of a County contract, Subsections 10.2.1 and 10.2.2 are also applicable to subcontracts and subcontract modifications.
   10.2.4    Before executing a contract or contract modification, the Director must make a determination as to the reasonableness of the cost or pricing data. The contract cost principles and procedures in the Federal Acquisition Regulations may be used as general guidelines when developing price determinations, if they are not at variance with County laws and regulations.
   10.2.5   The requirements of section 10.2 do not apply to a contract or contract modification that is based on:
      10.2.5.1    Adequate competition as determined by the Director;
      10.2.5.2    Established catalog or market prices of commercial items sold in substantial quantities to the general public;
      10.2.5.3   Prices set by laws or regulations;
      10.2.5.4   A noncompetitive contract awarded under a resolution or appropriation approved by the County Council, if the Using Department has made the certification required by Section 17.3.2.; or
      10.2.5.5   The Contractor has been specifically identified in a grant accepted by the County.
   10.2.6   In exceptional cases, or for contracts or contract modifications with public entities, the Director may waive the requirement for cost or pricing data by making a written determination that explains why the waiver is in the best interest of the County.
11B.00.01.11 Contract Modifications
11.1   General
   11.1.1   Authorization
Contract modifications may be initiated by the contractor, contracting officer, or the contract administrator. A contract modification is not effective, and a contractor must not proceed with performance under the modification, until and unless the contract modification is executed by the contracting officer.
   11.1.2   Use- Special Circumstances
      11.1.2.1    Under extraordinary circumstances, the Director may approve a contract modification:
         (a)   for goods, services, or construction that has already been provided;
         (b)   to a contract that has expired; or
         (c)    to a contract that has been fully completed.
      11.1.2.2    A contract modification may be used, among other things, to approve an equitable adjustment in the case of a unilateral change order. Subject to Chapter 20 of the County Code, a contract modification may be used to approve the settlement of a potential or pending contract dispute.
   11.1.3   Policy for Contract Modifications that Change the Scope of a Contract
      11.1.3.1   Contract modifications may not provide for less than full performance by the contractor as provided in the contract unless the contractor gives full and fair consideration (discount on contract price, additional work, etc.) in exchange for the contract modification. The County must not pay any additional monies under a contract modification for work which was required to be performed under the contract.
      11.1.3.2   A modification to a contract that was awarded by a competitive solicitation process may not materially depart from the scope of the original solicitation unless the goods, services, or construction being acquired by the modification could be acquired from the incumbent contractor by a separate non-competitive or emergency procurement.
         In the absence of a non-competitive or emergency procurement justification, the modification must be of a kind that potential offerors reasonably could have anticipated.
   11.1.4   Review
      11.1.4.1    The Director reviews the proposed contract modification, with attachments if any. If the value of the proposed contract modification exceeds the threshold for an IFB or RFP, the Director must refer the contract modification to the CRC unless the Director determines that the change in compensation results from a mechanical application of an established cost indexing provision or other contract option which pre-determines price. Otherwise, the Director may approve the modification.
      11.1.4.2    The CRC reviews contract modifications referred by the Director. The CRC may approve, approve with conditions or reject any contract modification.
11.2   Change Orders
   11.2.1    Change orders may be initiated as provided in the contract. Generally, a change order is initiated by the contract administrator. The change order may not become effective, and a contractor may not proceed with performance of the change order, until and unless the change order is executed by the contracting officer.
   11.2.2   Changes which are outside the scope of the contract should not be processed in the form of a change order.
   11.2.3   The Director reviews the proposed change order, with attachments. If the net cost of all the changes in the proposed change order exceeds the threshold for an IFB or RFP, the Director must refer the change order to the CRC for review. Otherwise, the Director may approve the change order.
   11.2.4   The CRC reviews change orders referred by the Director. The CRC may approve, approve with conditions, or reject any change order in whole or in part.
11.3   Field Orders
   11.3.1   Field orders are used only in the following limited situations:
      11.3.1.1    To direct work when unforeseen and unanticipated conditions arise which require immediate action to mitigate costs or avoid delay claims, and there is insufficient time to process a change order;
      11.3.1.2    To order a minor change in the work not involving an adjustment in the contract sum or an extension of the contract time, not inconsistent with the intent of the contract documents;
      11.3.1.3    To provide a written interpretation, including drawings, necessary for the proper execution or progress of the work consistent with and reasonably inferable from the contract documents if the interpretation does not adjust the contract sum or the contract time.
   11.3.2   A field order may be issued by a person specifically delegated the authority to issue a field order under the contract and who acts as a contracting officer for the purpose of issuing the field order. If the estimated value of the field order exceeds the threshold for an IFB or RFP, the Using Department Head must consent to the field order prior to its issuance. A Using Department Head may not delegate this authority to the authorized government official at the place of performance.
   11.3.3   Prohibited field orders
      Field orders are not permitted if there is sufficient time to process a change order, a contract amendment, or, if appropriate, a new procurement to satisfy the County's needs.
Loading...