A. Any subdivision of land must be included on a plat approved by the Board and recorded in the land records before transfer of any part of the subdivided land.
B. A building permit may only be issued for a building located on a lot or parcel shown on a plat recorded in the County Land Records or on a parcel exempt from recording requirements under Subsection 3.3.B, and in a manner that does not result in the building or structure crossing a lot line. (Mont. Co. Code 1965, §§104-8, 104-9; Ord. No. 5-171, §1; Ord. No. 10-47, §2; Ord. No. 10-60, §§1, 2; Ord. No. 10-73, §1; Ord. No. 10-78, §§2, 3; Ord. No. 11-53, §2; Ord. No. 13-57, §2; Ord. No. 13-65, §1; Ord. No. 13-84, §1; Ord. No. 14-8, §1; Ord. No. 15-22, §2; Ord. No. 15-67, §1; Ord. No. 16-10, §1; Ord. No. 16-26; §1; Ord. No. 16-35, §1; Ord. No. 17-04, §1; Ord. No. 17-29, §1; Ord. No. 71-31; §1; Ord. No. 17-36, §§1, 2; Ord. No. 17-47, §1; Ord. No. 18-04, §1; Ord. No. 18-06, §1; Ord. No. 18-19, §2; Ord. No. 19-22, §2.)
Editor’s note—Portions of Section 3.2, 3.6 and 4.3 [collectively, formerly §50-20] are quoted in Remes v. Montgomery County, 387 Md. 52, 874 A.2d 470 (2005). Portions of the above sections are cited in Waters Landing Ltd. Partnership v. Montgomery County, 337 Md. 15, 650 A.2d 712 (1994); are described in Donohoe Construction Company, Inc. v. Montgomery County Council, 567 F.2d 603 (4th Cir. 1977); and are cited in Logan v. Town of Somerset, 271 Md. 42, 314 A.2d 436 (1974).
Ord. No. 19-12, § 3, states: Automatic Extensions.
(a) Notwithstanding any provision of portions of Section 4.3.J to the contrary, the validity period of any determination of adequate public facilities that was valid on March 31, 2009, or for which a timely application for an extension of the validity period was pending on March 31, 2009 is automatically extended for 8 years after the date when the validity period would otherwise have expired. This 8-year extension includes any extension granted automatically by any previous subdivision amendment and must be treated for all purposes as part of the validity period that was extended.
(b) Notwithstanding any provision of portions of Section 4.3.J to the contrary, the validity period of any determination of adequate public facilities that was valid on March 31, 2011, or for which a timely application for an extension of the validity period was pending on March 31, 2011, is automatically extended for 6 years after the date when the validity period would otherwise have expired. This 6-year extension includes any extension granted automatically by any previous subdivision amendment and must be treated for all purposes as part of the validity period that was extended.
(c) Notwithstanding any provision of portions of Section 4.3.J to the contrary, the validity period of any determination of adequate public facilities that was valid on March 31, 2013, or for which a timely application for an extension of the validity period was pending on March 31, 2013, is automatically extended for 4 years after the date when the validity period would otherwise have expired. This 4-year extension includes any extension granted automatically by any previous subdivision amendment and must be treated for all purposes as part of the validity period that was extended.
(d) Notwithstanding any provision of portions of Section 4.3.J to the contrary, the validity period of any determination of adequate public facilities that was valid on March 31, 2015 or for which a timely application for an extension of the validity period was pending on March 31, 2015, is automatically extended for 2 years after the date when the validity period would otherwise have expired. This 2-year extension must be treated for all purposes as part of the validity period that was extended.
(e) Notwithstanding any provision of portions of Section 4.3.J to the contrary, the validity period of any determination of adequate public facilities that was valid on July 28, 2020, or for which a timely application for an extension of the validity period was pending on July 28, 2020, is automatically extended for 2 years after the date when the validity period would otherwise have expired. This 2-year extension includes any extension granted automatically by any previous subdivision amendment and must be treated for all purposes as part of the validity period that was extended.
Ord. No. 19-12, § 4, states: Automatic Extensions:
(a) Notwithstanding any provision of Section 4.2.G to the contrary, the validity period of any preliminary subdivision plan that was valid on March 31, 2009, or for which a timely application for an extension of the validity period was pending on March 31, 2009, including any separate phase of a multi-phase plan, is automatically extended for 8 years after the date when the validity period would otherwise have expired. This 8-year extension includes any extension granted automatically by any previous subdivision amendment and must be treated for all purposes as part of the validity period that was extended.
(b) Notwithstanding any provision of Section 4.2.G to the contrary, the validity period of any preliminary subdivision plan that was valid on March 31, 2011, or for which a timely application for an extension of the validity period was pending on March 31, 2011, including any separate phase of a multi-phase plan, is automatically extended for 6 years after the date when the validity period would otherwise have expired. This 6-year extension includes any extension granted automatically by any previous subdivision amendment and must be treated for all purposes as part of the validity period that was extended.
(c) Notwithstanding any provision of Section 4.2.G to the contrary, the validity period of any preliminary subdivision plan that was valid on March 31, 2013, or for which a timely application for an extension of the validity period was pending on March 31, 2013, including any separate phase of a multi-phase plan, is automatically extended for 4 years after the date when the validity period would otherwise have expired. This 4-year extension includes any extension granted automatically by any previous subdivision amendment and must be treated for all purposes as part of the validity period that was extended.
(d) Notwithstanding any provision of Section 4.2.G to the contrary, the validity period of any preliminary subdivision plan that was valid on March 31, 2015, or for which a timely application for an extension of the validity period was pending on March 31, 2015, including any separate phase of a multi-phase plan, is automatically extended for 2 years after the date when the validity period would otherwise have expired. This 2-year extension must be treated for all purposes as part of the validity period that was extended.
(e) Notwithstanding any provision of Section 4.2.G to the contrary, the validity period of any preliminary subdivision plan that was valid on July 28, 2020, or for which a timely application for an extension of the validity period was pending on July 28, 2020, including any separate phase of a multi-phase plan, is automatically extended for 2 years after the date when the validity period would otherwise have expired. This 2-year extension must be treated for all purposes as part of the validity period that was extended.