Skip to code content (skip section selection)
Compare to:
SEC. 2-32.   RULES REGARDING EXPENDITURES EXCEEDING $50,000.
   (a)   Advertisement. No city expenditure exceeding $50,000 may be made without advertising for competitive bids or competitive sealed proposals pursuant to Chapter 252, Texas Local Government Code, as amended, and this division, or without following the advertisement requirements in Chapter 2269, Texas Government Code, as amended, and this division, for alternative delivery methods, except in cases of an immediate emergency, or where competitive bidding, sealed proposal, or an alternative delivery method is not otherwise required by state law or the city charter.
   (b)   Emergency expenditures. In cases of immediate emergency, the director may make the necessary emergency expenditure, subject to the approval of the city manager or a designee. If an emergency expenditure is made, a written report setting out the emergency purchase, accompanied by a definite statement of the occasion and the reasons for the purchase, must be submitted by the director to the city manager for presentation to the city council for its approval prior to payment for the purchase.
   (c)   Administratively authorized purchases. The following rules govern purchases authorized administratively as described in Section 2-30(d)(1) of this division:
      (1)   If the purchase is for goods, the director or the director's designee, or the city council if the purchase is being considered under Subsection (c)(6), shall tabulate the bids or sealed proposals and shall select the vendor or contractor with the lowest responsible bid (or with the most advantageous proposal if the purchase is by competitive sealed proposal under Chapter 252, Texas Local Government Code, as amended), or the vendor or contractor who provides the best value if the bid specifications or requirements indicate contract selection on a best value basis.
      (2)   If the purchase is for general services, the director or the director's designee shall tabulate the bids or sealed proposals and present to the city manager a recommendation as to the lowest responsible bidder (or as to the most advantageous proposal if the purchase is allowed by competitive sealed proposal under Chapter 252, Texas Local Government Code, as amended), or present a recommendation as to who provides the best value if the bid specifications or requirements indicate contract selection on a best value basis. The city manager, or the city council if the contract is being considered under Subsection (c)(6), shall select the contractor that provides the lowest responsible bid, the most advantageous proposal, or the best value, whichever applies.
      (3)   If the purchase is for facility construction, and an alternative delivery method is not being used, the director or the director's designee shall tabulate the bids or sealed proposals and present to the city manager a recommendation as to the lowest responsible bidder or proposer. The city manager, or the city council, if the contract is being considered under Subsection (c)(6), shall select the contractor with the lowest responsible bid or the most advantageous proposal.
      (4)   If the purchase is for facility construction, and an alternative delivery method is being used, the director or the director's designee shall present to the city manager a recommendation based on the applicable standard in Chapter 2269, Texas Government Code, as amended.
      (5)   If, in the opinion of the city manager or the city council, if the purchase is being considered under Subsection (c)(6) and no bid or sealed proposal is satisfactory or it is otherwise in the best interest of the city, the city manager or the city council may reject all bids or sealed proposals, and the director may readvertise for competitive bids or competitive sealed proposals.
      (6)   A member of the city council may request that a purchase or contract be brought before the city council for consideration any time before 48 hours have elapsed after bid or proposal opening.
   (d)   Contracts requiring council approval. The following rules govern competitive bid or sealed proposal contracts requiring a city expenditure exceeding $100,000:
      (1)   The director or the director's designee shall tabulate the bids or sealed proposals.
      (2)   If the purchase is for goods or general services, the city manager shall recommend to the city council who, in the city manager's opinion, provides the lowest responsible bid; the most advantageous proposal if the purchase is by competitive sealed proposal under Chapter 252, Texas Local Government Code, as amended; or the best value to the city if the bid specifications or requirements indicate contract selection on a best value basis. The city council shall determine which bidder provides the lowest responsible bid, the most advantageous proposal, or the best value, whichever applies, and, if that bidder or proposer is acceptable, approve the contract. If, in the judgment of the city council, no bid or sealed proposal is satisfactory or it is in the best interest of the city, then the city council may reject all bids or sealed proposals.
      (3)   If the purchase is for facility construction, and an alternative delivery method is not being used, the city manager shall recommend who, in the city manager's opinion, is the lowest responsible bidder. The city council shall determine the lowest responsible bidder and, if that bidder is acceptable, approve the contract. If, in the judgment of the city council, no bid or sealed proposal is satisfactory or it is in the best interest of the city, then the city council may reject all bids.
      (4)   If the purchase is for facility construction, and an alternative delivery method is being used, the director shall present to the city manager a recommendation. The city manager shall then present a recommendation to the city council. If, in the judgment of the city council, no bid, proposal, or other offer is satisfactory or it is in the best interest of the city, then the city council may reject all bids. All recommendations and determinations under this subsection must be made according to the criteria set out in Chapter 2269 of the Texas Government Code, as amended.
      (5)   If all bids or sealed proposals are rejected, the city council may authorize the director to readvertise or proceed otherwise, as may be determined at the discretion of the city council, in accordance with state law. The original specifications, as amended or changed, must be kept on file in the office of the director in accordance with Section 2-29 of this division.
   (e)   Additional rules for competitive bids. The following additional rules govern all purchases made by competitive bid, including purchases on a best value basis, in accordance with Subsections (c) and (d) of this section:
      (1)   If there is a single responsive bid, the director, the city manager, or the city council may consider the bid as the lowest responsible bid.
      (2)   A nonresponsive bid has the effect of being a no bid and may not be considered for any purpose.
      (3)   A bid that has been opened is not subject to amendment, alteration, or change for the purpose of correcting an error in the bid price. This restriction is not intended to alter, amend, or revoke the common law right of a bidder to withdraw a bid due to a material mistake in the bid.
      (f)   Competitive sealed proposals. For the purchase of goods and general services (including but not limited to community development items, high technology items, and insurance) requiring a city expenditure exceeding $50,000, the director may follow the competitive sealed proposal procedures authorized in this division and in Chapter 252, Texas Local Government Code, as amended. If the director chooses not to follow the competitive sealed proposal process, the purchase must be competitively bid as required by this division and by Chapter 252, Texas Local Government Code, as amended.
   (g)   Electronic procurement and reverse auctions. The city manager may establish procedures for purchasing goods, general services, or facility construction under this section through electronic means, including but not limited to the Internet, to the extent the procedures do not conflict with state law, the city charter, or other provisions of this code. The city manager may also establish procedures for purchasing goods or general services pursuant to the reverse auction method defined in Section 2155.062(d), Texas Government Code, as amended, to the extent the procedures do not conflict with state law, the city charter, or other provisions of this code.
   (h)   Competitive purchasing programs. The director may, with prior authorization by city council resolution, purchase goods, including high technology items, through a cooperative purchasing program established pursuant to Chapter 271, Subchapter D, F, or G, Texas Local Government Code, as amended, or through a cooperative purchasing program established by interlocal agreement pursuant to Chapter 791, Texas Government Code, as amended. Authorized participation in a cooperative purchasing program satisfies the requirements of this section.
   (i)   Local preferences.
      (1)   Where a contract is required to be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder and a competitive bid is received from a nonresident bidder, the city may not award a governmental contract to the nonresident bidder unless the nonresident's bid is lower than the lowest bid submitted by a responsible Texas resident bidder by the same amount that a Texas resident bidder would be required to underbid a nonresident bidder to obtain a comparable contract in the state in which the nonresident's principal place of business is located. This requirement does not apply to a contract involving federal funds.
      (2)   In a purchase for goods, general services, or facility construction through competitive bid, if one or more bids are received from a local business whose bid is within five percent of the lowest responsible bid received from a bidder who is not a local business, a contract for facility construction in an amount less than $100,000 or a contract for goods or general services in an amount less than $500,000 may be awarded to:
         (A)   the bidder with the lowest responsible bid; or
         (B)   the local business if the city council determines, in writing, that the bid submitted by the local business offers the city the best combination of contract price and additional economic development opportunities for the city created by the contract award, including employment of residents of the city and increased tax revenue to the city.
      (3)   In a purchase for goods through competitive bid, if one or more bids are received from a local business whose bid is within three percent of the lowest responsible bid received from a bidder who is not a local business, a contract in an amount of $500,000 or more may be awarded to:
         (A)   the bidder with the lowest responsible bid; or
         (B)   the local business if the city council determines, in writing, that the bid submitted by the local business offers the city the best combination of contract price and additional economic development opportunities for the city created by the contract award, including employment of residents of the city and increased tax revenue to the city.
      (4)   Subsection (i)(2) of this section does not apply to the purchase of telecommunication services or information services, as those terms are defined by 47 U.S.C. Section 153, as amended.
      (5)   Subsections (i)(2) and (i)(3) of this section do not prohibit the city from rejecting all bids. (Ord. Nos. 24243; 25819; 28705; 30828; 31872)