(a) An owner or manager, or agent or employee of an owner or manager, of a bookstore, newsstand, theater, or other commercial establishment engaged in selling material or exhibiting performances, who, in the course of business does any of the acts prohibited by Section 666.11 is presumed to have knowledge of the character of the material or performance involved if the owner, manager, or agent or employee of the owner or manager has actual notice of the nature of such material or performance, whether or not the owner, manager, or agent or employee of the owner or manager has precise knowledge of its contents.
(b) Without limitation on the manner in which such notice may be given, actual notice of the character of material or a performance may be given in writing by the chief legal officer of the Municipality. Such notice, regardless of the manner in which it is given, shall identify the sender, identify the material or performance involved, state whether it is obscene or harmful to juveniles, and bear the date of such notice.
(c) Section 666.11 does not apply to a motion picture operator or projectionist acting within the scope of employment as an employee of the owner or manager of the theater or other place for the showing of motion pictures to the general public, and having no managerial responsibility or financial interest in the operator’s or projectionist’s place of employment, other than wages.
(d) (1) The provisions of Sections 666.11, 666.115 and 666.14(a) do not apply to a person solely because the person provided access or connection to or from an electronic method of remotely transferring information not under that person’s control, including having provided capabilities that are incidental to providing access or connection to or from and that do not include the creation of the content of the material that is the subject of the access or connection.
(3) Subsection (d)(1) hereof does not apply to a person who provides access or connection to an electronic method of remotely transferring information that is engaged in the violation of Section 666.11, 666.115 or 666.14 and that contain content that person has selected and introduced into the electronic method of remotely transferring information or content over which that person exercises editorial control.
(e) An employer is not guilty of a violation of Section 666.11, 666.115 or 666.14 based on the actions of an employee or agent of the employer unless the employee’s or agent’s conduct is within the scope of the employee’s or agent’s employment or agency, and the employer does either of the following:
(1) With knowledge of the employee’s or agent’s conduct, the employer authorizes or ratifies the conduct.
(2) The employer recklessly disregards the employee’s or agent’s conduct.
(f) It is an affirmative defense to a charge under Section 666.11 or 666.115 as the section applies to an image transmitted through the internet or other electronic method of remotely transmitting information that the person charged with violating the section has taken, in good faith, reasonable, effective, and appropriate actions under the circumstances to restrict or prevent access by juveniles to material that is harmful to juveniles, including any method that is feasible under available technology.
(ORC 2907.35)