Loading...
(a) A person commits an offense if, in a geologically similar area and without first obtaining an escarpment permit from the city expressly authorizing the act, he:
(1) removes or injures any trees or vegetation; or
(2) alters the physical condition of the land in any way. Examples of alterations to the physical condition of the land include, but are not limited to dumping, excavation, storage, and filling.
(b) It is a defense to prosecution under Subsection (a) that the act was the modification of a single family or duplex structure existing on the date of passage of this ordinance, and the modification did not:
(1) change the use of the structure;
(2) cause the size of the structure to exceed by 50 percent or more the size of the structure as it existed on the date of passage of this ordinance; or
(3) cause the market value of the structure to exceed by 50 percent or more the market value of the structure as it existed on the date of passage of this ordinance. (Ord. Nos. 19455; 26000)
(a) An applicant for an escarpment permit shall request a preapplication conference with the escarpment area review committee. The purpose of the conference is to determine what information must be submitted with the permit application to allow a complete evaluation of the proposed project. After the conference, the committee shall advise the director of its findings and recommendations.
(b) After the preapplication conference, the applicant shall submit an application for an escarpment permit to the director. The application must be on a form approved by the director and be signed by the owner of the property. Except as otherwise provided in this division, the following items must be provided as part of the application:
(1) The name and address of:
(A) the owner(s) of the property; and
(B) the person(s) who prepared the plans and drawings submitted.
(2) A general vicinity map of the proposed development site.
(3) A one inch = 100 feet scale site plan showing details of the terrain and area drainage. This site plan must be a contour map with two-foot contour intervals.
(4) A one inch = 50 feet scale cross section and plan review of any proposed structures.
(5) Results of the slope stability analysis required under Section 51A-5.205.
(6) The soil erosion control plan required under Section 51A-5.206.
(7) The grading plan required under Section 51A-5.207.
(8) The vegetation plan required under Section 51A-5.208.
(9) Financial assurance in the form of a letter of credit, a performance bond, or other instrument payable to the city of Dallas for all improvements related to the required soil erosion control, grading, and vegetation plans to insure that funds are available to the city to implement those plans if the developer fails to implement them.
(10) A performance and maintenance bond for each private development contract for the construction of public infrastructure improvements.
(11) One inch = 100 feet scale transparent overlay drawings of the required soil erosion control, grading, and vegetation plans such that a composite map can be created by combining the overlay drawings and the site plan required under Subsection (b)(3).
(12) Cost estimates and timetables for implementation and completion of work specified in the required soil erosion control, grading, and vegetation plans.
(13) Any other information that the director determines to be necessary to allow for a complete evaluation of the proposed project.
(c) If the director determines that one or more of the items listed in Subsection (b) is not necessary to allow for a complete review of the proposed project, he shall waive the requirement that the item or items be provided.
(d) All plans, drawings, and specifications submitted as part of an application for an escarpment permit must comply with the requirements of this chapter and all applicable ordinances, rules, and regulations of the city of Dallas.
(e) Upon submission by the applicant of a complete application for an escarpment permit, the director shall forward copies of all materials submitted to the escarpment area review committee for consideration. Upon review of all materials submitted, the committee shall furnish the director a written report containing its recommendations and comments concerning the proposed project. The director shall consider the committee’s report before making a decision to grant or deny the escarpment permit.
(f) If the application and other materials submitted show that the proposed project complies with the requirements of this chapter and all applicable ordinances, rules, and regulations of the city of Dallas, the director shall issue an escarpment permit and forward the application to the building official for further action. Otherwise, the director shall deny the escarpment permit.
(g) The building official shall not issue a building permit for any project for which an escarpment permit is required unless the director has first issued an escarpment permit authorizing the work.
(h) The director may not authorize any disturbance of the land for development purposes until both the required soil erosion control and grading plans have been submitted and approved. After the approval of both of these plans, the director may issue a limited permit to authorize clearing and grubbing.
(i) A decision made by the director to grant or deny an escarpment permit may be appealed to the board of adjustment in the same manner that appeals are made from decisions of the building official.
(j) An inspector from the department shall monitor all development for which an escarpment permit is required to ensure compliance with the approved plans, the requirements of this chapter, and all applicable ordinances, rules, and regulations of the city of Dallas. (Ord. Nos. 19455; 25047; 26000; 28073)
(a) For all proposed development within a geologically similar area, field and laboratory tests must be performed on samples taken from representative locations within the development site to ascertain the existing geotechnical conditions.
(b) A slope stability analysis must be performed for each new structure to be erected within a geologically similar area. No structure may be erected where the slope stability factor of safety is less than 1.5.
(c) Except for items that are expressly waived by the director, the slope stability analysis data submitted must include the following:
(1) A description of the boring location(s).
(2) Drillers logs of borings delineating the stratigraphy of the soil and bedrock.
(3) The locations and methods used to determine groundwater conditions and elevations.
(4) A table of field and laboratory engineering tests including, but not limited to shear strength tests, atterberg limits, and shrink/swell tests.
(5) Calculations for the slope stability analysis, including the criteria and parameters used, indicating the slope and location of slip surfaces and corresponding factors of safety.
(d) All analyses, designs, tests, and calculations for new development within a geologically similar area must be certified by a registered professional engineer. A registered professional engineer must also certify that structural foundations for all new development are designed to meet the requirements of the building code and all other applicable codes. (Ord. Nos. 19455; 26000)
(a) A soil erosion control plan must be submitted for all proposed development within a geologically similar area. Except for items that are expressly waived by the director, the plan must:
(1) show the type of soil cover as mapped by the Soil Conservation Service and confirmed by representative field tests and samples;
(2) indicate the susceptibility to erosion of the mapped soils as confirmed by representative field tests and samples;
(3) show the location of existing and proposed development;
(4) include a timing schedule indicating starting and completion dates of the development activities sequence and the time of exposure of each area prior to completion of control measures;
(5) contain a complete description of all measures to be taken to prevent or control erosion and sedimentation of soils during and after construction;
(6) comply with best management practices standards for storm water pollution prevention plans; and
(7) be certified by a registered professional engineer.
(b) Development within a geologically similar area must conform to the following performance standards:
(1) Development must be fitted to the topography and soils to minimize cut and fill sections.
(2) Grading is not permitted within the one-percent annual chance flood plain boundaries of watercourses unless it is:
(A) in conjunction with the construction of approved drainage facilities; or
(B) authorized by a city council approved fill permit. All grading must comply with Section 51A-5.207 of this division.
(3) Indigenous vegetation must be retained and protected except in immediate areas of development so that a minimal amount of vegetation is removed or replaced. If vegetation is removed, it must be replaced with new vegetation of the same variety unless the building official approves an alternative variety as being less susceptible to disease or better suited for urban development.
(4) Development must be accomplished in a manner which assures that as small an area as possible is exposed to erosion at any one time. When land is exposed during development, the exposure must be kept to the shortest practical period of time not to exceed six months. In extraordinary cases, an extension of the six month time period may be granted in writing by the director. In such cases the director shall seek and consider the recommendation of the escarpment area review committee before making his decision.
(5) Areas where construction activities have ceased for more than 21 days must be stabilized by the developer to minimize erosion through the use of temporary or permanent vegetation, mulching, sod, geotextiles, or similar measures. In cases where permanent measures are not installed, the developer must maintain the temporary measures until the site is either fully developed or permanent vegetation with a density of at least 70 percent of the native background vegetative cover for the area has been installed.
(6) Sediment basins or other installations approved by the director must be installed and maintained to remove sediment from runoff waters accumulating on land undergoing development. These installations should be returned to natural conditions upon the substantial completion of improvements or when the director determines that the installations are no longer needed. In any event, the owner shall cause these installations to be returned to natural conditions within 90 days after written notice to do so is given by the director.
(7) Runoff caused by changed soil and surface conditions during and after development, both above and below the escarpment zone, must be controlled on each development site within approved drainage facilities so that the runoff velocity leaving the site is maintained at or below predevelopment rates. Site-specific erosion control is required below the escarpment zone where the erosion control plan shows detrimental erosion caused by runoff velocities.
(8) When additional storm water runoff is being discharged onto the face of the escarpment, the property owner’s engineer shall provide an analysis of whether the additional storm water runoff has a negative effect on the escarpment. If the additional storm water runoff has a negative effect, then detention is required.
(9) Stormwater drainage may not be discharged over the escarpment face at eroding velocities as those velocities are defined in the soil evaluation reports. In no event may the discharge exceed a velocity greater than three feet per second. Stormwater drainage discharge must comply with Section 51A-5.207 of this division.
(10) Temporary vegetation and mulching must be used to protect areas exposed during development. Permanent vegetation must be established on disturbed areas following development in accordance with the vegetation plan required under Section 51A-5.208 of this division.
(11) Channel velocities may not exceed five feet per second, except that velocities higher than five feet per second may be maintained at up to predevelopment rates in the escarpment and chalk zones if the developer establishes to the satisfaction of the director that these velocities do not produce detrimental erosion. If damaging erosion is occurring, site-specific erosion control measures are required. Energy dissipators, if required, must be approved by the director to maintain channel velocities at acceptable levels. (Ord. Nos. 19455; 26000; 30893; 31314)
(a) A grading plan must be submitted for all proposed development within a geologically similar area. Except for items that are expressly waived by the director, the following items must be included as part of the plan:
(1) A soil engineering report. This report must include data regarding the nature, distribution and strength of existing soils, conclusions and recommendations for grading procedures, design criteria for corrective measures when necessary, and opinions and recommendations covering adequacy of the site to be developed. The report must be signed by a registered professional engineer.
(2) An engineering geology report. This report must include an adequate description of the geology of the site, conclusions and recommendations regarding the effect of geologic conditions on the proposed development, and opinions and recommendations covering the adequacy of the site to be developed. The report must be signed by a registered professional engineer.
(3) Limiting dimensions, elevations or finish contours to be achieved by grading, and proposed drainage channels and related construction.
(4) Detailed plans for all surface and subsurface drainage devices, walls, cribbing, dams, and other protective devices to be constructed with or as a part of the proposed work, together with a map showing the drainage area and the estimated runoff of the area.
(b) Development within a geologically similar area must conform to the following performance standards:
(1) Grading must be planned so as to have the least disturbance on the area’s natural topography, watercourses, vegetation, and wildlife. This may preclude all development in certain areas. No cleared, graded, or otherwise disturbed land may be left without temporary protective stabilizing cover. (See Section 51A-5.206.)
(2) The maximum slopes permitted in geologically similar areas shall be determined by the director based on the results of the geotechnical investigations of the site materials and other factors analyzed in this division.
(3) Topsoil must be stockpiled and redistributed on areas where vegetation will be grown after the grading is completed. Methods to insure maintenance of these areas until vegetation is established must be detailed. (Ord. Nos. 19455; 26000)
(a) A vegetation plan must be submitted for all proposed development in a geologically similar area. Except for items that are expressly waived by the director, the plan must:
(1) show the location and type of landscape features and plant materials in the areas of proposed development; and
(2) specify all proposed vegetation removal and replacement.
(b) Development in a geologically similar area must conform to the following performance standards:
(1) Indigenous vegetation must be retained and protected except in immediate areas of development so that a minimal amount of vegetation is removed or replaced. If vegetation is removed, it must be replaced with new vegetation of the same variety unless the building official approves an alternative variety as being less susceptible to disease or better suited for urban development.
(2) Shrub borders must be maintained around woodlands where practicable.
(3) Landscaping must consist of ecologically suitable plant species. (Ord. Nos. 19455; 26000; 30893)
Loading...