1-17-19: SOLE SOURCE; AWARD OF CONTRACT WITHOUT COMPETITION; NOTICE:
   A.   As used in this section:
      1.   "Transitional costs" mean the costs of changing from an existing provider of, or type of, a procurement item to another provider of, or type of, procurement item.
      2.   "Transitional costs" include:
         a.   Training costs;
         b.   Conversion costs;
         c.   Compatibility costs;
         d.   System downtime;
         e.   Disruption of service;
         f.   Installation costs; and
         g.   Ancillary software, hardware, equipment, or construction costs.
      3.   "Transitional costs" do not include:
         a.   The costs of preparing for or engaging in a procurement process; or
         b.   Contract negotiation or contract drafting costs.
   B.   The city may award a contract for a procurement item without competition if the city determines in writing that:
      1.   There is only one source for the procurement item; or
      2.   The award to a specific supplier, service provider, or contractor is a condition of a donation that will fund the full cost of the supply, service, or construction item.
   C.   Circumstances under which there is only one source for a procurement item may include:
      1.   Where the most important consideration in obtaining a procurement item is the compatibility of equipment, technology, software, accessories, replacement parts, or service;
      2.   Where a procurement item is needed for trial use or testing;
      3.   Where transitional costs are unreasonable or cost prohibitive; or
      4.   Procurement of public utility services.
   D.   The city shall make rules regarding the publication of notice for a sole source procurement that, at a minimum, require publication of notice of a sole source procurement, in accordance with section 63G-6a-406, Utah code, if the cost of the procurement exceeds fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00).
   E.   The city may extend a contract for a reasonable period of time without engaging in a standard procurement process, if:
      1.   The award of a new contract for the procurement item is delayed due to a protest or appeal;
      2.   The standard procurement process is delayed due to unintentional error;
      3.   Changes in industry standards require significant changes to specifications for the procurement item;
      4.   The extension is necessary to prevent loss of federal funds;
      5.   The extension is necessary to address a circumstance where the appropriation of state or federal funds has been delayed; or
      6.   The extension covers the period of time during which contract negotiations with a new provider are being conducted. (Ord. 2014-08, 8-5-2014)