Loading...
16-61.5   Appeal.
   A person aggrieved by the requirements of this Section may seek an administrative appeal to the Inspectional Services Department. Any person aggrieved by a final decision under this Section by the Inspectional Services Department, may seek relief in any court of competent jurisdiction as provided by the laws of the commonwealth.
(CBC 1985 16-61.5; Ord. 2016 c. 14 § 1)
16-62   ORDINANCE BANNING FACE SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY IN BOSTON.
   (A)   Definitions. For the purpose of this Section, the following definitions shall apply unless the context clearly indicates or requires a different meaning.
      BOSTON. Any Department, Agency, Bureau and/or subordinate division of the city.
      BOSTON OFFICIAL. Any person or entity acting on behalf of the city, including any officer, employee, agent, contractor, subcontractor or vendor.
      FACE SURVEILLANCE. An automated or semi-automated process that assists in identifying or verifying an individual, or in capturing information about an individual, based on the physical characteristics of an individual’s face.
      FACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM. Any computer software or application that performs face surveillance.
   (B)   Ban on city use of face surveillance.
      (1)   It shall be unlawful for Boston or any Boston official to:
         (a)   Obtain, retain, possess, access or use:
            1.   Any face surveillance system; or
            2.   Information derived from a face surveillance system.
         (b)   Enter into an agreement with any third party for the purpose of obtaining, retaining, possessing, accessing or using, by or on behalf of Boston or any Boston official any face surveillance system; or
         (c)   Issue any permit or enter into any other agreement that authorizes any third party, on behalf of Boston or any Boston official, to obtain, retain, possess, access or use:
            1.   Any face surveillance system; or
            2.   Information derived from a face surveillance system.
      (2)   Nothing in division (B)(1) shall prohibit Boston or any Boston official from:
         (a)   Using evidence relating to the investigation of a specific crime that may have been generated from a face surveillance system, so long as such evidence was not generated by or at the request of Boston or any Boston official;
         (b)   Obtaining or possessing:
            1.   An electronic device, such as a cell phone or computer, for evidentiary purposes; or
            2.   An electronic device, such as a cell phone or tablet, that performs face surveillance for the sole purpose of user authentication.
         (c)   Using face recognition on an electronic device, such as a cell phone or tablet, owned by Boston or by any Boston official, for the sole purpose of user authentication;
         (d)   Using social media or communications software or applications for communicating with the public; provided such use does not include the affirmative use of any face surveillance;
         (e)   Using automated redaction software; provided such software does not have the capability of performing face surveillance; or
         (f)   Complying with the National Child Search Assistance Act of 1990, being 34 U.S.C. §§ 41307 et seq.
   (C)   Enforcement.
      (1)   Face surveillance data collected or derived in violation of this Section shall be considered unlawfully obtained and shall be deleted upon discovery, subject to applicable law.
      (2)   No data collected or derived from any use of face surveillance in violation of this Section and no evidence derived therefrom may be received in evidence in any proceeding in or before any Department, Officer, Agency, regulatory body, legislative committee or authority subject to the jurisdiction of the city.
      (3)   Any violation of this Section constitutes an injury and any person may institute proceedings for injunctive relief, declaratory relief or writ of mandate in any court of competent jurisdiction to enforce this Section. A court shall award costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees to a plaintiff who is the prevailing party in such proceedings. An action instituted under this division (C)(3) shall be brought against the respective City Department, and the city and, if necessary to effectuate compliance with this Section, any other governmental Agency with possession, custody or control of data subject to this Section.
      (4)   Violations of this Section by a city employee shall result in consequences that may include retraining, suspension or termination, subject to due process requirements and provisions of collective bargaining agreements.
      (5)   Nothing in this Section shall be construed to limit any individual’s rights under commonwealth or federal law.
   (D)   Severability.
      (1)   If any provision of this Section shall be held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, then such provision shall be considered separately and apart from the remaining provisions, which shall remain in full force and effect.
   (E)   Effective date. The provisions of this Section shall be effective immediately upon passage.
(CBC 1985 16-62; Ord. 2020 c. 2)
16-63   ORDINANCE ON SURVEILLANCE OVERSIGHT AND INFORMATION SHARING
Loading...