Skip to code content (skip section selection)
Compare to:
Antioch Overview
Antioch, CA Code of Ordinances
City of Antioch, California Code of Ordinances
ADOPTING ORDINANCE
TITLE 1: GENERAL PROVISIONS
TITLE 2: ADMINISTRATION
TITLE 3: FINANCE
TITLE 4: PUBLIC SAFETY
TITLE 5: PUBLIC WELFARE, MORALS, AND CONDUCT
TITLE 6: SANITATION AND HEALTH
TITLE 7: PUBLIC WORKS
TITLE 8: BUILDING REGULATIONS
TITLE 9: PLANNING AND ZONING
CHAPTER 1: [RESERVED]
CHAPTER 2: OFFICIAL PLAN LINES
CHAPTER 3: DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
CHAPTER 4: SUBDIVISIONS
CHAPTER 5: ZONING
ARTICLE 1: TITLE, PURPOSE, SCOPE, AND ADOPTION OF PLAN
ARTICLE 2: DEFINITIONS
ARTICLE 3: ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICTS
ARTICLE 4: [RESERVED]
ARTICLE 5: SIGN REGULATIONS
ARTICLE 6: HEIGHT AND AREA REGULATIONS AND TABLE
ARTICLE 7: MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS
ARTICLE 8: PROJECTIONS INTO YARDS
ARTICLE 9: SPECIAL USE REGULATIONS
ARTICLE 10: LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION
ARTICLE 11: SITE OBSTRUCTIONS AT INTERSECTIONS
ARTICLE 12: TREE PRESERVATION AND REGULATION
ARTICLE 13: SCREENING OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT/OUTDOOR STORAGE
ARTICLE 14: REFUSE STORAGE AREA DESIGN GUIDELINES
ARTICLE 15: UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
ARTICLE 16: FENCES, WALLS, HEDGES AND SCREEN PLANTINGS
ARTICLE 17: PARKING REQUIREMENTS
ARTICLE 18: BUILDING MOVING
ARTICLE 19: NOISE ATTENUATION REQUIREMENTS
ARTICLE 20: SWIMMING POOLS AND HOT TUBS
ARTICLE 21: FIRE RETARDANT ROOFING MATERIALS
ARTICLE 22: HOME SIZE MODIFICATIONS
ARTICLE 23: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
ARTICLE 24: HILLSIDE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
ARTICLE 25: PLANNING COMMISSION AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
ARTICLE 26: DESIGN REVIEW DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
ARTICLE 27: DESIGN REVIEW, USE PERMITS, ADMINISTRATIVE USE PERMITS AND VARIANCES
ARTICLE 28: AMENDMENTS
ARTICLE 29: INTERPRETATIONS, ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTY
ARTICLE 30: NONCONFORMING USES AND STRUCTURES
ARTICLE 31: CONDOMINIUM CONVERSIONS
ARTICLE 32: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS
ARTICLE 33: SPECIFIC PLANS
ARTICLE 34: SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY DISTRICT
ARTICLE 35: DENSITY BONUS PROGRAM
ARTICLE 36: ZONING MAP
ARTICLE 37: DETERMINATION OF BOUNDARIES
ARTICLE 38: LAND USE REGULATIONS
ARTICLE 39: REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION
ARTICLE 40: RESIDENTIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT
ARTICLE 41: RRMP RODDY RANCH MASTER PLAN DISTRICT
ARTICLE 42: PROHIBITION ON CONVERSION OF SENIOR MOBILEHOME PARKS
TITLE 10: PARKS AND RECREATION
TITLE 11: TENANT PROTECTIONS
TABLE OF SPECIAL ORDINANCES
PARALLEL REFERENCES
Loading...
§ 9-5.2703.1 ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE.
   (A)   Purpose. The provisions of this section allow for an administrative review of requests to vary from the general setback requirements contained in the Municipal Code by a maximum of 25% of the required setback. Variance requests which are over 25% of the required setback shall require a public hearing as specified in Article 27.
   (B)   Application. An application for an administrative variance shall be filed using the general variance application provided by the Community Development Department. It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide evidence in support of the required findings.
   (C)   Jurisdiction. The Zoning Administrator shall have the authority to consider and act on a request for an administrative variance. The Zoning Administrator shall issue a written determination within 30 days of the date of receipt of a completed application and may approve the variance, subject to conditions of approval, or deny the request. All written determinations shall give notice of the right to appeal.
   (D)   Notice. Notice of the variance request shall be given to property owners immediately adjacent (both sides and to the rear) to the project site. Notices shall be mailed out as soon as reasonably practicable after the application has been deemed complete.
   (E)   Findings. The Zoning Administrator may approve an administrative variance only after making all of the findings contained in § 9-5.2703(B)(2) in the affirmative.
(Ord. 994-C-S, passed 4-23-02)
§ 9-5.2704 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.
   In approving a design review, use permit, administrative use permit or variance, the Planning Commission, Design Review Board, or the Zoning Administrator may impose reasonable conditions necessary to:
   (A)   Achieve the general purposes of this chapter and/or the specific purposes of the zoning district in which the site is located, and/or to make it consistent with the General Plan;
   (B)   Protect the public health, safety, and general welfare; and/or
   (C)   Ensure operation and maintenance of the use in a manner compatible with existing and potential uses on adjoining properties and/or in the surrounding area.
(Ord. 897-C-S, passed 10-25-94)
§ 9-5.2705 APPEALS; ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AND PLANNING COMMISSION.
   (A)   Administrative use permits shall become effective immediately upon the action of the Zoning Administrator, unless otherwise specified by that action. Appeals may be considered in the manner outlined below.
   (B)   A use permit or variance shall become effective at the end of the appeal period, unless appealed in accord with the following:
      (1)   In the event that applicant or others affected are not satisfied with the action of the Zoning Administrator, they may appeal to the Commission. Such appeal shall be in writing and shall be filed with the Director of Development Services within five working days after the decision. The day the decision is made shall not count in the calculation of the time period. The term WORKING DAYS shall mean days upon which the City Hall is open for business and shall exclude weekends and holidays observed by employees in the City Hall. If, after a hearing by the Commission, the applicant or others affected are not satisfied with the decision of the Commission, they may appeal to the Council within five working days after the decision in accord with this section.
      (2)   The Commission or Council, whichever is appropriate for the appeal, acting through the Director of Development Services or the City Clerk, shall set the date for a public hearing and shall give notice as set forth in this chapter. Notice shall also be given the Commission or Zoning Administrator of such appeal, and the Commission or Zoning Administrator, whichever is appropriate, shall submit a report to the Commission or Council setting forth the reasons for the action taken.
      (3)   The Council or Commission shall render its decision within 60 days after the filing of such appeal, unless the time period is extended by stipulation.
      (4)   No building permit shall be issued in any case where a use permit or variance is required by the provisions of this chapter until five working days after the granting of such use permit or variance by the Commission or Zoning Administrator. In the event of an appeal, no such building permit shall be granted until the appeal process has been completed. Building permits issued pursuant to the provisions of this article shall conform to the terms and conditions of the use permits or variances granted.
      (5)   All appeals to the Commission or Council from the Design Review Board, Zoning Administrator or Commission shall be accompanied by a filing fee as specified by resolution. The City Clerk shall waive the filing fee upon satisfaction that the appellant is indigent.
(Ord. 897-C-S, passed 10-25-94)
§ 9-5.2706 APPEALS; DESIGN REVIEW BOARD.
   In the event the applicant or other person is not satisfied with the architectural design criteria estab-lished by the Design Review Board, they may, within five days after such decision, appeal in writing to the Council in the same manner as an appeal for a use permit or variance, except that the appeal to the Council shall not be a public hearing.
(Ord. 897-C-S, passed 10-25-94)
§ 9-5.2707 LAPSE OF APPROVAL.
   (A)   A design review, use permit, administrative use permit, or variance shall lapse one year after date of approval or at an alternative time specified as a condition of approval:
      (1)   A building permit has been issued and construction has diligently commenced thereon and has not expired;
      (2)   A certificate of occupancy has been issued;
      (3)   The use is established; or
      (4)   The design review, use permit, admini-strative use permit or variance is renewed per division (D) of this section.
   (B)   Unless otherwise specified by a condition of approval, the validity of a design review, use permit, administrative use permit or variance shall not be affected by changes in ownership as long as the use or structure is substantially similar or the same as originally approved and, in the case of a use permit or administrative use permit, the use is a conforming one. If the site remains unused for a continuous one-year period, however, the use permit, admini-strative use permit or variance is considered expired and a new approval is necessary. Nonconforming non-residential uses with previously approved use permits/administrative use permits (e.g., those no longer conforming with the underlying zoning or General Plan designation) shall be subject to review upon changes in ownership or tenancy.
   (C)   A design review, variance or use permit may be renewed or extended by the Zoning Administrator for a one-year period without notice or public hearing, if the findings required remain valid and application is made prior to expiration. No more than two one year extensions may be granted.
(Ord. 897-C-S, passed 10-25-94; Am. Ord. 1017-C-S, passed 3-23-04)
§ 9-5.2707.1 VIOLATION; REVOCATION; FINE.
   (A)   Revocation. A design review, use permit, or variance that is exercised in violation of a condition of approval or a provision of this chapter may be revoked, as follows: the Commission shall hold a hearing on any proposed revocation after giving written notice to the permittee at least 15 days prior to the hearing.
   (B)   Imposition of fine. In lieu of revoking a design review, use permit or variance, the Commission may impose an administrative fine of not more than $2,500 for each day that a violation has occurred. Before imposing any such fine, the city shall give the entitlement holder at least 15 days' advance written notice of the date, time and place where the Commission will consider the action, along with a specification of the violation and the proposed amount of fines. The permit holder shall be given theopportunity to address the Commission and to provide any information or argument regarding the matter. Any fine shall be a civil debt owed to the city and may be collected through proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction. Any fine may be collected in connection with a nuisance abatement action or with the issuance of an injunction.
(Ord. 1017-C-S, passed 3-23-04)
§ 9-5.2708 CHANGED PLANS; NEW APPLICATION.
   (A)   A request for changes in conditions of approval of a design review, use permit or variance, or a change to site plans that would affect a condition of approval, shall be treated as a new application unless the Zoning Administrator finds that the changes to the approved plans are non-controversial, minor, do not involve substantial alterations or additions to the plans, and are consistent with the intent of the original approval.
   (B)   If an application for a design review use permit or variance is disapproved, no new application for the same, or substantially the same, design review, use permit or variance shall be filed within one year of the date of denial of the initial appli-cation, unless the denial was made without prejudice.
(Ord. 897-C-S, passed 10-25-94)
Loading...