Loading...
PDSD DIRECTOR APPROVAL PROCESS | |
APPLICATION TYPES | |
1. Changes of use; 2. Downtown Area Infill Incentive District –
within the Downtown Core Sub-district requesting a modification of
regulations (Note:
within the Greater Infill Incentive Sub-district are processed in accordance with the 400' Notice Procedure below); 3. Electrical connections (certain types); 4. Expansion of existing premises; 5. Home occupations; 6. Individual Parking Plans for
greater than 300' from R-3 or more restrictive zoning districts; 7. New construction; 8. Nonconforming same Land Use Class substitution; 9. Nonconforming parking areas; 10. Parking Design Modification Requests (except requests to modify the number of bicycle or motor vehicle parking spaces); 11.
within certain overlay zones; 12. Restricted adult activities; 13. Temporary uses or structures; 14. Tenant improvements; 15. Wireless Communication uses (certain types); 16. Rio Nuevo District Zone Minor Modifications of Development Regulations (MDR); 17. Zoning Compliance for Site Improvements in Existence on May 1, 2005; 18. Other applications, such as blood donor centers and circus, carnival and tent shows; or 19. Site plans (Site plans in Overlay Districts require different time frames for review). | |
TIME FRAME | |
Administrative Compliance Review for Application Completeness | 20 working
|
Substantive Review | 65 working
|
Overall Time frame | 85 working
. Note: This time period includes a second review after return of comments on the first review, or when a
package or site plan is required. Total time is less if only one review is needed for a particular approval, or when a
package or site plan is not required. |
PDSD DIRECTOR APPROVAL PROCEDURE: 100' NOTICE PROCEDURE | |
APPLICATION TYPES | |
1. Design Development Options (DDO) in accordance; 2. Parking Design Modification Requests to the required number of bicycle and motor vehicle parking spaces; 3. PDSD
Special Exception applications; 4. Approval of resident artisan uses in the Historic Preservation Zone; 5. Certain wireless facilities; 6. Requests for demolition of contributing, non-historic structures in the HPZ. | |
TIME FRAMES | |
Administrative Compliance Review for Application Completeness | 20 working
|
Substantive Review | 35 working |
Overall Time frame | 55 working |
PDSD DIRECTOR APPROVAL PROCEDURE: 400' NOTICE PROCEDURE | |
APPLICATION TYPES | |
1. Mitigation plans for certain restaurants serving alcohol within 300 feet of R-3 or more restrictive zoning; 2.
within the Greater Infill Incentive Sub-district of the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District requesting a Modification of Development Regulations; and, 3. Individual Parking Plans for
within 300 feet of R-3 or more restrictive zoning districts. | |
TIME FRAMES | |
Administrative Compliance Review for Application Completeness | 20 working
|
Substantive Review | 45 working |
Overall Time frame | 65 working |
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL |
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL | ||
APPLICATION TYPES | ||
1. Compliance with certification of existing premises. 2. Interpretations of the UDC. 3. Planned Area Development interpretations. 4. Zone boundary conflicts. | ||
TIME FRAMES | ||
Regular Review | Complex issues requiring additional research or a City Attorney opinion: | |
Administrative Compliance Review for Application Completeness | 20 working | 20 working |
Substantive Review | 10 working | 25 working |
Overall Time frame | 30 working | 45 working |
PDSD DIRECTOR APPROVAL IN CERTAIN OVERLAY ZONES |
PDSD DIRECTOR APPROVAL IN CERTAIN OVERLAY ZONES | |
APPLICATION TYPE | |
Historic Preservation Zone Design Review | |
TIME FRAMES | |
Administrative Compliance Review for Application Completeness | 20 working |
Substantive Review: | |
Full Review | 40 working |
Minor Review | 25 working |
Overall Time frame: | |
Full Review | 60 working |
Minor Review | 45 working |
APPLICATION TYPE | |
Rio Nuevo District Design Review | |
TIME FRAMES | |
Administrative Compliance Review for Application Completeness | 20 working |
Substantive Review: | |
Major | 65 working |
Minor | 50 working |
Overall Time frame: | |
Major Review | 85 working |
Minor Review | 70 working |
APPLICATION TYPE | |
Neighborhood Preservation Zone Design Review | |
TIME FRAME | |
Administrative Compliance Review for Application Completeness | 20 working
|
Substantive Review | 20 working |
Overall Time frame | 40 working |
PDSD DIRECTOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION PROCEDURE | |
APPLICATION TYPE | |
Special Exceptions requiring PDSD
approval | |
TIME FRAME | |
Administrative Compliance Review for Application Completeness | 20 working |
Substantive Review | 25 working |
Overall Time frame | 45 working |
ZONING EXAMINER SPECIAL EXCEPTION PROCEDURE | |
APPLICATION TYPE | |
1. Special Exceptions requiring ZE decision under the UDC. 2. Substitution of nonconforming uses (uses not in the same land use class). 3. Expansion of nonconforming uses. | |
TIME FRAME | |
Administrative Compliance Review for Application Completeness | 20 working |
Substantive Review | 40 working
for administrative review |
Overall Time frame | 60 working
for administrative review The substantive and overall time frames are suspended from overall time frame under A.R.S. § 9-835(C)(8)(c) for the required ZE Public Hearing |
(Am. Admin. Directive 1.02-9, rev. 4/25/2014; Am. Ord. 11732, 2/19/2020)
Section
3-03.1.0 GENERAL
3-03.2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROCESSES
TABLE 3-03 TYPICAL TIMEFRAMES FOR COMPLIANCE REVIEW/FLEXIBLE OPTION
In 2011 the Arizona Legislature passed a “Regulatory Bill of Rights” (SB 1598) requiring municipalities to establish and adhere to time frames in a broad range of permitting processes. Under the law, cities must create an overall permitting time frame for each process, consisting of an “administrative completeness” time frame and a “substantive review” time frame. The aim of this bill was to create faster, more uniform, and more transparent processes, goals which the City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD) share. However, the implementation of these time frames may have unforeseen consequences.
Under the SB 1598 regulatory-limits process, the city must determine whether a permit application is complete or not during the administrative completeness time frame. If the city fails to make this determination within established time limits, the permit is deemed complete regardless of deficiencies. Similarly, during the substantive review period, an application must be denied or approved within the established time frame or the permit fee will be refunded.
The SB 1598 regulatory-limits process offers applicants very limited opportunities to supplement their application with additional material after submission. Moreover, changes to a permit application are limited to responses to a PDSD request. Development changes proposed by the applicant do not appear to be allowed. Upon proper denial, during either review period, applicants must reapply with new plans and pay another permit fee.
PDSD is committed to customer service and recognizes that applicants may not wish to be locked into formulaic
which do not provide an adequate opportunity to submit additional requested materials and desired plan changes. Thus, PDSD offers applicants the opportunity to make permit applications according to either the SB 1598 regulatory-limits process or the more flexible process City of Tucson PDSD customers are familiar with.
Under the flexible application process, applicants have multiple opportunities to alter or amend their application and to confer with city staff for advice. This allows the applicant to adjust plans based on their own changing development circumstances over time or on suggestions by staff. Additionally, applicants may alter their permit applications as many times as necessary during the process.
Applicants are encouraged to carefully consider which application process best meets their needs. Staff can explain the processes in more detail upon request as well as provide you a copy of SB 1598. The following points outline some of the highlights of each process.
A. A limited number of opportunities to confer with staff and supply necessary information and materials. PDSD may request additional information only once after the application is deemed administratively complete.
B. If city fails to meet established timeframe for review, an application may be deemed complete although lacking essential materials. If an application is not timely approved or denied, fees are refunded to the applicant.
C. During review period applicant may lose opportunity to propose alterations to support permit approval or changes in circumstance during development.
D. If permit properly denied after PDSD one-time request for more information, applicant must reapply and pay new fee.
E. Denials must be explained and the applicable code provisions identified.
F. Applicant may request code clarification.
A. Multiple application conferences available before submittal and during process.
B. During review period applicant may propose changes to support permit approval and substantial and multiple changes may be made without reapplication.
C. Same review timeframes as currently applied for the different application types. (See Table 3-03 below.)
D. No refund for a review period longer than the established timeframe. However, PDSD meets or exceeds established permit review period in 85-90% of applications. Complex applications or substantial changes may take longer.
E. Denials will be explained and the applicable code provisions identified.
F. Applicant may request code clarification.
PDSD DIRECTOR APPROVAL PROCEDURE | |
APPLICATION TYPES | |
1. Business licenses; 2. Changes of use; 3. Downtown Area Infill Incentive District - projects within the Downtown Core Sub-district requesting a modification of development regulations (Note: projects within the Greater Infill Incentive Sub district are processed in accordance with the 400' Notice Procedure below); 4. Electrical connections (certain types); 5. Expansion of existing premises; 6. Home occupations; 7. Individual Parking Plans for projects greater than 300' from R-3 or more restrictive zoning districts; 8. New construction; 9. Nonconforming same Land Use Class substitution; 10. Nonconforming parking areas; 11. Parking Design Modification Requests (except requests to modify the number of bicycle or motor vehicle parking spaces); 12. Projects within certain overlay zones; 13. Restricted adult activities; 14. Temporary uses or structures; 15. Tenant improvements; 16. Wireless Communication uses (certain types); 17. Rio Nuevo District Zone Minor Modifications of Development Regulations (MDR); 18. Zoning Compliance for Site Improvements in Existence on May 1, 2005; 19. Other applications, such as blood donor centers and circus, carnival and tent shows; 20. Site plans (Site plans in Overlay Districts require different time frames for review); 21. Subdivision tentative plat; and, 22. Subdivision final plat. | |
TIMEFRAME | |
Administrative Compliance Review for Application Completeness | 10 working days |
Substantive Review | For applications that do not require a site plan or a subdivision plat: 10 working days, or 5 working days after the date of submittal of a required recommendation by a special reviewer, board or committee. Thereafter, the same review period after each re-submittal For applications that require a site plan or subdivision plat: 20 calendar days Thereafter, 20 calendar days for each re-submittal |
Substantive Review | For application that do not require a site plan or subdivision plat: 14 calendar days For applications that require a site plan or subdivision plat: 20 to 60 calendar days or more, depending upon the number of re-submittals |
PDSD DIRECTOR APPROVAL PROCEDURE: 100' NOTICE PROCEDURE | |
APPLICATION TYPES | |
1. Design Development Options (DDO) in accordance; 2. Parking Design Modification Requests to the required number of bicycle and motor vehicle parking spaces; 3. PDSD Director Special Exception applications; 4. Approval of resident artisan uses in the Historic Preservation Zone; 5. Certain wireless facilities; and, 6. Requests for demolition of contributing, non-historic structures in the HPZ. | |
TIMEFRAME | |
Administrative Compliance Review for Application Completeness | 10 working days |
Substantive Review | 30 calendar days |
Overall Timeframe | 40 calendar days |
PDSD DIRECTOR APPROVAL PROCEDURE 400' NOTICE PROCEDURE | |
APPLICATION TYPES | |
1. Mitigation plans for certain restaurants serving alcohol within 300 feet of R-3 or more restrictive zoning; 2. Projects within the Greater Infill Incentive Subdistrict of the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District requesting a Modification of Development Regulations; and, 3. Individual Parking Plans for projects within 300 feet of R-3 or more restrictive zoning districts. | |
TIMEFRAME | |
Administrative Compliance Review for Application Completeness | 10 working days |
Substantive Review | 45 calendar days |
Overall Timeframe | 55 calendar days |
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL PROCEDURE | |
APPLICATION TYPES | |
1. Compliance with certification of existing premises; 2. Interpretations of the UDC; 3. Planned Area Development interpretations; and, 4. Zone boundary conflicts. | |
TIMEFRAME | |
Administrative Compliance Review for Application Completeness | 10 working days |
Substantive Review | 5 working days for most applications Additional time is required for complex issues or interpretations that require a City Attorney legal opinion, 20-30 calendar days |
Overall Timeframe | 10 working days for most applications For complex issues of interpretations that require a City Attorney legal opinion, 30-40 calendar days |
PDSD DIRECTOR APPROVAL IN CERTAIN OVERLAY ZONES |
PDSD DIRECTOR APPROVAL IN CERTAIN OVERLAY ZONES | |
APPLICATION TYPE | |
Historic Preservation Zone Design Review | |
TIMEFRAME | |
Administrative Compliance Review for Application Completeness | 10 working days |
Substantive Review: | |
Full Review | 45 calendar days |
Minor Review | 30 calendar days |
Overall Timeframe: | |
Full Review | 55 calendar days |
Minor Review | 40 calendar days |
APPLICATION TYPE | |
Rio Nuevo District Design Review | |
TIMEFRAME | |
Administrative Compliance Review for Application Completeness | 10 working days |
Substantive Review: | |
Major | 70 calendar days |
Minor | 55 calendar days |
Overall Timeframe: | |
Major Review | 80 calendar days |
Minor Review | 55 calendar days |
APPLICATION TYPE | |
Neighborhood Preservation Zone Design Review | |
TIMEFRAME | |
Administrative Compliance Review for Application Completeness | 10 calendar days |
Substantive Review | 20 calendar days |
Overall Timeframe | 30 calendar days |
PDSD DIRECTOR SPECIAL EXCEPTION PROCEDURE | |
APPLICATION TYPE | |
Special Exceptions requiring PDSD Director decision | |
TIMEFRAME | |
Administrative Compliance Review for Application Completeness | 10 working days |
Substantive Review | 15 calendar days |
Overall Timeframe | 25 calendar days |
ZONING EXAMINER SPECIAL EXCEPTION PROCEDURE | |
APPLICATION TYPES | |
1. Special Exceptions requiring ZE decision 2. Substitution of nonconforming uses (uses not in the same land use class) 3. Expansion of nonconforming uses | |
TIMEFRAME | |
Administrative Compliance Review for Application Completeness | 10 working days |
Substantive Review | 35 calendar days for administrative review |
Overall Timeframe | 45 calendar days The ZE Public Hearing timeframe is suspended from overall timeframe under A.R.S. § 9-835(C)(8)(c) |
MAYOR AND COUNCIL SPECIAL EXCEPTION PROCEDURE | |
APPLICATION TYPE | |
Special Exceptions requiring Mayor and Council decision | |
TIMEFRAME | |
Administrative Compliance Review for Application Completeness | 10 working days |
Substantive Review | 45 calendar days for administrative review |
Overall Timeframe | 55 calendar days The M/C Public Hearing timeframe is suspended from overall timeframe under A.R.S. § 9-835(C)(8)(c) |
(Am. Ord. 11732, 2/19/2020)