(A) Plan consistency. When adopting or rejecting any zoning text or map amendment, the Board of Aldermen shall approve a brief statement describing whether its action is consistent or inconsistent with an adopted comprehensive plan. The requirement for a plan consistency statement may also be met by a clear indication in the minutes of the Board of Aldermen that at the time of action on the amendment the Board of Aldermen was aware of and considered the Planning Board's recommendations and any relevant portions of an adopted comprehensive plan. If a zoning map amendment is adopted and the action was deemed inconsistent with the adopted plan, the zoning amendment shall have the effect of also amending any future land-use map in the approved plan, and no additional request or application for a plan amendment shall be required. For a future land use map that is deemed amended, if it is a CAMA plan, then such amendment is not effective until it goes through the CAMA plan-amendment process. (G.S. § 160D-501.) A plan amendment and a zoning amendment may be considered concurrently. The plan consistency statement is not subject to judicial review. If a zoning map amendment qualifies as a "large-scale rezoning" under G.S. § 160D-602(b), the Board of Aldermen statement describing plan consistency may address the overall rezoning and describe how the analysis and policies in the relevant adopted plans were considered in the action taken.
(B) Additional reasonableness statement for rezonings. When adopting or rejecting any petition for a zoning map amendment, a statement analyzing the reasonableness of the proposed rezoning shall be approved by the Board of Aldermen. This statement of reasonableness may consider, among other factors, (i) the size, physical conditions, and other attributes of the area proposed to be rezoned; (ii) the benefits and detriments to the landowners, the neighbors, and the surrounding community; (iii) the relationship between the current actual and permissible development on the tract and adjoining areas and the development that would be permissible under the proposed amendment; (iv) why the action taken is in the public interest; and (v) any changed conditions warranting the amendment. If a zoning map amendment qualifies as a “large-scale rezoning” under G.S. § 160D-602(b), the Board of Aldermen statement on reasonableness may address the overall rezoning.
(C) Single statement permissible. The statement of reasonableness and the plan consistency statement required by this section may be approved as a single statement.
(D) Voting. A simple majority on the first reading permits adoption of a legislative decision for development regulation. (G.S. § 160A-75, S.L. 2019-111 Sec. 2.5 (n)).
(G.S. § 160D-605) (Ord. passed 7-1-2021)