A. A system extension or reinforcement required by a subdivision or other development outside the present electric service area will be considered economically justified if the city's expense and investment in the construction is not greater than 2.0 times the expected gross annual revenue from the subdivision or other development.
B. If the City Engineer determines that the requested extension is not justified economically, the applicant shall pay as a connection charge, in addition to all other applicable charges, the amount required to reduce the city's investment in the construction of 2.0 times the expected annual gross revenue.
C. The City Engineer's decision, after consideration of all available facts, will be final.
D. Extension of the electric distribution system to serve subdivisions or developments will be subject to budgetary considerations and approval by the City Council for any expenditure of city funds not specifically budgeted for.
(Ord. 588, 1991).