(a) In considering the appropriateness of any change, the Review Board shall take into account, in addition to any other pertinent factor, the historical and architectural style and significance of the property; the general design, arrangement, texture, material and color of the proposed change as it relates to the property in its present condition, and the relation thereof to the same or related factors in other properties, sites and areas in the immediate vicinity; and the economic enhancement of the community through the protection of property values.
(b) Care shall be taken to avoid the environmentally harmful effect often created by the clash of contemporary materials with those of older origin, such as aluminum or other metals, plastic, fiberglass and glass improperly used with brick, stone, masonry and wood.
(c) New developments within preservation districts shall be compatible with their surroundings.
(d) The Review Board shall refer to the criteria and guidelines for sign and design review established by the Board pursuant to the terms of this chapter. Such guidelines shall promote the conservation, development and use of properties, sites and districts within the City and shall seek to preserve the special historical, architectural, community and aesthetic integrity of the landmark or district. Such guidelines shall guide applicants in making submittals and the Review Board in making its determination as to the appropriateness of the proposed change.
(e) The Review Board shall consider the advice of those consultants whose opinion is sought by the Review Board with respect to any application for a certificate of appropriateness.
(Ord. 160-95. Passed 6-19-95.)
(f) The guidelines to be used by the Review Board shall include the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Treatment of Archeological Properties: A Handbook.
(Ord. 285-95. Passed 9-5-95.)