APPENDIX II   EXAMPLES OF CONTINUITY STANDARDS FOR PROPOSED STREET NAMING
   The following are graphic examples of the continuity standards for proposed street naming of Section 1020.05(e).
   Example 1: Section 1020.05(e)(1):
   Except for where cul-de-sacs or other dead-end rights of way are created, where a proposed non-median divided right of way intersects with and crosses an existing or proposed non-median divided right of way:
      A.   If the offset distance between centerlines is fifty feet or less, the street name for the proposed non-median divided right of way shall continue through the intersection. (See "Exchange St" and "Endieott Dr").
 
      B.   If the offset distance between centerlines if greater than fifty feet, the street name for the proposed non-median divided right of way shall not continue through the intersection. (See "Redrose Dr" and "White Oak Dr").
 
   Example 2: Section 1020.05(e)(2)
   Where a proposed non-median divided right of way intersects with and crosses an existing or proposed median divided right of way:
      A.   The proposed non-median divided right of way shall be assigned two separate street names regardless of the offset distance between centerlines. (See "Deer Run Way" and "Marshfield Dr").
      B.   The street name of the median divided right of way shall continue through the intersection. (See "Ashburn Farm Pkwy").
 
   Example 3: Section 1020.05(e)(3)
   Where a proposed median divided right of way intersects with and crosses an existing non-median divided right of way:
      A.   The existing non-median divided right of way shall be renamed in accordance with Section 1020.07(f).
      B.   The street name of the proposed median divided right of way shall continue through the intersection.
 
   Example 4: Section 1020.05(e)(4)
   Where a proposed median divided right of way intersects with and crosses an existing or proposed median divided right of way, the street names for both medians divided rights of way shall continue through the intersection.
 
   Example 5: Section 1020.05(e)(5)
   Where culs-de-sac or other dead-end rights of way are created:
      A.   If a proposed right of way intersects with and crosses an existing or proposed right of way and terminates in a cul-de-sac or other dead-end before intersecting with and crossing another right of way, the street name for the proposed right of way shall not continue through the intersection. (See "Wooded Hollow Dr" and "Wildflower Meadow Ct").
 
      B.   If a proposed right of way intersects with but does not cross a proposed right of way (a "T" intersection) that terminates in culs-de-sac or other dead-ends on both sides of the intersection (forms a double-ended cul-de-sac or dead-end), the street name for the double-ended cul-de-sac or dead-end shall continue through the intersection. (See "Titnore Ct").
      C.   The posting of address ranges at the entrance of the double-ended cul-de-sac or dead-end right of way shall be required. Maintenance and replacement of signs displaying street address ranges shall be the responsibility of a homeowners' association or the individual property owners served by the cul-de-sac in accordance with Chapter 1021.
 
(Ord. 16-11. Passed 9-14-16.)