1161.09 DESIGN REVIEW.
   (a)    Upon approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the permit application must be reviewed and approved by the Architectural Board of Review. In addition to the submission requirements in Section 1111.07, Final Development Plan Submission Requirements, the applicant shall provide the following information:
      (1)    The location of any electrical or signal transmitting wires or cables to be used;
      (2)    The specific antenna support structure device which is to be used;
      (3)    The proposed method of screening the antenna support structure to make it as inconspicuous as possible and help it blend into the surrounding area, where feasible;
      (4)    Elevation drawings illustrating the placement, height, color and material of the antenna and its support structure; and
   (b)    If the information provided in sub-section (a) above does not clearly convey placement alternatives on the site, the Architectural Board of Review may require an independent evaluation of signal access for a minimum of the three most feasible, alternated locations on the site. The evaluation shall be prepared by a consultant approved by the Architectural Board of Review and paid for by the applicant.
   (c)    Prior to approval of a wireless telecommunication facility, the Architectural Board of Review shall find as follows:
      (1)    There is no other location on the site for the proposed antenna support structure which would resulting a less conspicuous or more aesthetically pleasing installation while still providing reasonable signal access;
      (2)    The antenna and its support structure is the smallest possible for the frequency used and optimally located to allow reasonable signal access;
      (3)    Apart from the tower or monopole structure, the facility appurtenances shall be aesthetically and architecturally compatible with the architecture of the surrounding environment;
      (4)    The color of the structure blends with the surrounding environmental characteristics; and
      (5)    A landscape plan shall be reasonably designed to enhance the aesthetic quality of the tower, location and to adequately screen the site from the view of drivers and pedestrians to the greatest extent possible.
         (Ord. 2006-35. Passed 5-25-06.)