An application for a Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved, unless the Commission finds that the proposed use complies with the following conditions and standards.
(a) To be approved in a Residential District, the Commission must find that:
(1) The proposed use will be properly located in relation to the secondary and local streets and pedestrian circulation pattern; and
(2) The proposed use will generate only a minimum of traffic through a residential neighborhood if locating along a local street; and
(3) The proposed use is necessary to serve the surrounding residential areas, which neighborhood cannot be served satisfactorily if the same use is located in a nearby, less restrictive district where it may be permitted by right; and
(4) The location, design and operation of such use would not discourage or interfere with the appropriate development or impair the value of the surrounding Residential District.
(b) To be approved in any other district, the Commission must find that:
(1) The proposed use is necessary to serve community needs in existing facilities located in a less restrictive or more remote district in which the use may be permitted by right are inadequate.
(2) The proposed use would not be closer than appropriate in the particular situation to schools, churches and other places of assembly; and
(3) The location, size, intensity and layout of the proposed use and operations would conform to the noise, smoke, dust, odor, fume, vibration and/or glare performance standards of the district; and
(4) The proposed use will form a harmonious part of the district wherein it is proposed to be located, considering such features as convenience of access and relationship of one use to another; and
(5) Because of its limited size, modern process or equipment, the performance of the proposed use is such that it should be properly permitted in a less restrictive district than the district in which it is permitted by right; and
(6) The hours of operation of the proposed use are similar to a use permitted in a district, and that the proposed use will not generate more traffic than normal for the district.
(Ord. 1966-99. Passed 12-12-66.)