19.44.040 Findings
The appropriate review authority as outlined in Table 31.01 shall record the decision in writing and shall recite therein the findings upon which any such decision is based. The review authority may approve and/or modify an Administrative or Development Permit in whole or in part, and shall impose specific development conditions. These conditions shall relate to both on- and off-site improvements that are necessary to mitigate project- related adverse impacts, and to carry out the purpose and requirements of the respective zone. The review authority may approve an Administrative or Development Permit, only if all of the following findings are made:
(Ord. MC-1393, 12-02-13; Ord. MC-1381, 12-19-12)
   1.   The proposed development is one permitted within the subject zoning district and complies with all of the applicable provisions of this Development Code, including prescribed development/site standards and any/all applicable design guidelines;
   2.   The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan;
   3.   The proposed development would be harmonious and compatible with existing and future developments within the zone and general area, as well as with the land uses presently on the subject property
(Ord. MC-1381, 12-19-12)
   4.   The approval of the Administrative or Development Permit for the proposed development is in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and Section 19.20.030(6) of the Development Code;
   5.   There will be no potential significant negative impacts upon environmental quality and natural resources that could not be properly mitigated and monitored;
   6.   The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed;
   7.   There are adequate provisions for public access, water, sanitation, and public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed use would not be detrimental to public health and safety; and
   8.   The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed development would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.
(Ord. MC-888, 12-07-93)