The following considerations shall be examined in the review and the public hearing of an application for variance:
(A) That special circumstances or conditions exist which are peculiar to the land or structure(s) involved and which are not applicable to other lands or structures in the village.
(B) That a literal interpretation of the provisions of this Zoning Ordinance would result in practical difficulties for the owner of the property. The factors to be considered by the Planning Commission in making this determination are:
(1) Whether the property in question will yield a reasonable return or whether there can be any beneficial use of the property without the variance.
(2) Whether the variance is substantial.
(3) Whether the essential character of the neighborhood would be substantially altered, or whether adjoining properties would suffer a substantial detriment as a result of the variance.
(4) Whether the variance would adversely affect the delivery of governmental services.
(5) Whether the property owner purchased the property with knowledge of the zoning restriction.
(6) Whether the property owner’s predicament feasibly can be obviated through some method other than a variance.
(7) Whether the spirit and intent behind the zoning requirement would be required to be observed and substantial justice done by granting the variance.
(C) That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant.
(D) That the granting of the variance will in no other manner adversely affect the health, safety and general welfare of the persons residing or working within the vicinity of the proposed variance, and not diminish or impair established property values within the surrounding areas, and not unreasonably increase the congestion in public streets.
(Ord. 583, passed 4-21-1986; Am. Ord. 05-2009, passed 7-20-2009; Am. Ord. 03-2014, passed 8-18-2014)