You are viewing an archived code

Sec. 59-G-2.19. Educational institutions, private.
   (a)   Generally. A lot, tract or parcel of land may be allowed to be used for a private educational institution if the board finds that:
      (1)   the private educational institutional use will not constitute a nuisance because of traffic, number of students, noise, type of physical activity, or any other element which is incompatible with the environment and character of the surrounding neighborhood;
      (2)   except for buildings and additions completed, or for which a building permit has been obtained before (date of adoption [April 2, 2002]), the private educational institution must be in a building architecturally compatible with other buildings in the surrounding neighborhood, and, if the private educational institution will be located on a lot, tract, or parcel of land of 2 acres or less, in either an undeveloped area or an area substantially developed with single-family homes, the exterior architecture of the building must be similar to a single-family home design, and at least comparable to any existing homes in the immediate neighborhood;
      (3)   the private educational institution will not, in and of itself or in combination with other existing uses, affect adversely or change the present character or future development of the surrounding residential community; and
      (4)   the private educational institution must conform with the following standards in addition to the general development standards as specified in Section G-1.23:
         a.   Density—The allowable number of pupils per acre permitted to occupy the premises at any one time must be specified by the Board considering the following factors:
            1.   Traffic patterns, including:
               a)   Impact of increased traffic on residential streets;
               b)   Proximity to arterial roads and major highways;
               c)   Provision of measures for Transportation Demand Management as defined in Section 42A-21 of the Montgomery County Code;
               d)   Adequacy of drop-off and pick-up areas for all programs and events, including on-site stacking space and traffic control to effectively deter queues of waiting vehicles from spilling over onto adjacent streets; and
            2.   Noise or type of physical activity;
            3.   Character, percentage, and density of existing development and zoning in the community;
            4.   Topography of the land to be used for the special exception; and
            5.   Density greater than 87 pupils per acre may be permitted only if the Board finds that (i) the program of instruction, special characteristics of students, or other circumstances justify reduced space and facility requirements; (ii) the additional density will not adversely affect adjacent properties; (iii) additional traffic generated by the additional density will not adversely affect the surrounding streets.
         b.   Buffer—All outdoor sports and recreation facilities must be located, landscaped or otherwise buffered so that the activities associated with the facilities will not constitute an intrusion into adjacent residential properties.  The facility must be designed and sited to protect adjacent properties from noise, spill light, stray balls and other objectionable impacts by providing appropriate screening measures, such as sufficient setbacks, evergreen landscaping, solid fences and walls.
   (b)   If a Private Educational Institution operates or allows its facilities by lease or other arrangement to be used for: (i) tutoring and college entrance exam preparatory courses, (ii) art education programs, (iii) artistic performances, (iv) indoor and outdoor recreation programs, or (v) summer day camps, the Board must find, in addition to the other required findings for the grant of a Private Education Institution special exception, that the activities in combination with other activities of the institution, will not have an adverse effect on the surrounding neighborhood due to traffic, noise, lighting, or parking, or the intensity, frequency, or duration of activities.  In evaluating traffic impacts on the community, the Board must take into consideration the total cumulative number of expected car trips generated by the regular academic program and the after school or summer programs, whether or not the traffic exceeds the capacity of the road.  A transportation management plan that identifies measures for reducing demand for road capacity must be approved by the Board.
   The Board may limit the number of participants and frequency of events authorized in this section.
   (c)   Programs Existing before April 22, 2002.
      (1)   Where previously approved by the Board, a private educational institution may continue the operation of (i) tutoring and college entrance exam preparatory courses, (ii) art education programs, (iii) artistic performances, (iv) indoor and outdoor recreation programs, or (v) summer day camps, whether such programs include students or non-students of the school, if the number of participants and frequency of events for programs authorized in 59-G-2.19(b) are established in the Board’s approval.
   (2)   Where not previously approved by the Board, such programs may continue until April 22, 2004.  Before April 22, 2004, the underlying special exception must be modified to operate such programs, whether such programs include students or non-students of the school.  The Board may establish a limit on the number of participants and frequency of events for authorized programs.
   (d)   Site plan.
      (1)   In addition to submitting such other information as may be required, an applicant shall submit with his application a site plan of proposed development. Such plan shall show the size and shape of the subject property, the location thereon of all buildings and structures, the area devoted to parking and recreation facilities, all access roads and drives, the topography and existing major vegetation features, the proposed grading, landscaping and screening plans and such other features necessary for the evaluation of the plan.
      (2)   No special exception, building permit or certificate of occupancy shall be granted or issued except in accordance with a site plan of development approved by the board. In reviewing a proposed site plan of development the board may condition its approval thereof on such amendments to the plan as shall be determined necessary by the board to assure a compatible development which will have no adverse effect on the surrounding community, and which will meet all requirements of this chapter. Any departure from a site plan of development as finally approved by the board shall be cause for revocation of the special exception, building permit or certificate of occupancy, in the manner provided by law.
   (e)   Exemptions. The requirements of Section G-2.19 do not apply to the use of any lot, lots or tract of land for any private educational institution, or parochial school, which is located in a building or on premises owned or leased by any church or religious organization, the government of the United States, the State of Maryland or any agency thereof, Montgomery County or any incorporated village or town within Montgomery County.  This exemption does not apply to any private educational institution which received approval by the Board of Appeals to operate a private educational institution special exception in a building or on a lot, lots or tract of land that was not owned or leased by any church or religious organization at the time the Board of Appeal's decision was issued.
   (f)   Nonconforming uses. Nothing in this chapter shall prevent any existing private educational institution which obtained a special exception prior to the effective date of this chapter, from continuing its use to the full extent authorized under the resolution granting the respective special exception, subject, however, to division 59-G-4 of this chapter.
   (g)   Public Buildings. 
      (1)   A special exception is not required for any private educational institution that is located in a building or on premises that have been used for a public school or that are owned or leased by Montgomery County.
      (2)   However, site plan review under Division 59-D-3 is required for:
         (i)   construction of a private educational institution on vacant land owned or leased by Montgomery County; or
         (ii)   any cumulative increase that is greater than 15% or 7,500 square feet, whichever is less, in the gross floor area, as it existed on February 1, 2000, of a private educational institution located in a building that has been used for a public school or that is owned or leased by Montgomery County.  Site plan review is not required for: (i) an increase in floor area of a private educational institution located in a building that has been used for a public school or that is owned or leased by Montgomery County if a request for review under mandatory referral was submitted to the Planning Board on or before February 1, 2000, or (ii) any portable classroom used by a private educational institution that is located on property owned or leased by Montgomery County and that is in place for less than one year.
   (h)   Applications filed before May 6, 2002.  Any application filed before May 6, 2002 for a private educational institution special exception or modification of a private educational institutional special exception must comply with the requirements of Article 59-G and Article 59-E in effect at the time the special exception was filed.
(Legislative History: Ord. No. 10-19, § 2; Ord. No. 11-3, § 2; Ord. No. 11-30, § 1; Ord. No. 12-1, § 1; Ord. No. 12-80, § 2; Ord. No. 14-13, § 1; Ord. No. 14-15, § 1; Ord. No. 14-46, § 2; Ord. No. 14-47, § 1; Ord. No. 14-62, § 1.)
   Editor’s note—The constitutionality and validity of Section 59-G-2.19 was upheld in Ehlers-Renzi v. Connelly School of the Holy Child, Inc., 224 F.3d 283 (4th Cir. 2000).  In Springloch Area Citizens Group v. Montgomery County Board of Appeals, 252 Md. 717, 251 A.2d 357 (1969), the court affirmed the granting of a special exception permit for a private school in an R-60 zoning district.  Section 59-G-2.19 [formerly §104-29] is quoted in part in Creative Country Day School of Sandy Spring, Inc. v. Montgomery County Board of Appeals, 242 Md. 552, 219 A.2d 789 (1966).
   Section 2 of Ord. No. 14-15, reads as follows: “Subsection (e) of Section 59-G-2.19, expires on August 1, 2001.
   Cross reference—Private schools and recreational camps, § et seq.