You are viewing an archived code
No building or use is permitted except a mobile home development. A mobile home development is a residential development intended to accommodate mobile homes but which may also include the following facilities for the service of the residents of the development but must not include recreational vehicles:
Mobile (manufactured) homes.
Modular homes. Where an applicant relies upon this unit type, the term modular (manufactured) home may be used in conjunction with or substituted for the term mobile home throughout the provisions of this zone.
Pedestrian-oriented local retail and personal service facilities which are intended exclusively for the use of the residents of the mobile home development; provided, that such retail and personal service facilities occupy not more than 10 square feet of gross floor area for each mobile home in the development.
Business offices, for business connected with the management, service and maintenance of the development.
Noncommercial community recreational facilities which are intended exclusively for the use of the residents of the mobile home development and their guests.
Publicly owned or publicly operated uses.
Accessory buildings and uses.
Child day care facility is a permitted use for up to 12 children and a special exception use for 13 or more children in conformance with the special exception provisions of division 59-G-2.
A cable communication system is permitted as a special exception, except as provided in sections 59A-6.9 and 59-A-2.10.1.
(Legislative History: Ord. No. 10-6, § 3; Ord. No. 10-35, § 3; Ord. No. 11-41, § 5; Ord. No. 13-12, § 3.)
Editor's note-Section 59-C-3.2 [formerly § 59-44] is quoted in part in Kanfer v. Montgomery County Council, 35 Md.App. 715, 373 A.2d 5 (1977). Section 59-C-3.2 [formerly § 111-12] is quoted in F & B Development Corporation v. County Council for Montgomery County, 22 Md.App. 488, 323 A.2d 659 (1974) and in Wahler v. Montgomery County Council, 249 Md. 62, 238 A.2d 266 (1968); is cited in Malasky v. Montgomery County Council, 258 Md. 612, 267 A.2d 182 (1970) and in Bayer v. Siskind, 247 Md. 116, 230 A.2d 316 (1967); and is cited and described in O. F. Smith Brothers Development Corporation v. Montgomery County, 246 Md. 1, 227 A.2d 1 (1967).
The provisions of the last paragraph have been added in order to effectuate the intent of Ord. No. 10-6, § 3.