(a) Applications shall be evaluated in the timeframes as follows:
(1) Type 1 applications 60 days.
(2) Type 2 applications 90 days.
(3) Type 3 applications 120 days.
(b) Applications shall be reviewed for completeness. If the application is incomplete, then the applicant will be notified of the insufficiency, and the time frames set forth in subsection (a) shall be tolled until the application is made complete
(c) The time frames set out in subsection (a) may also be tolled as follows:
(1) If the Village receives between fifteen and thirty applications in a thirty-day period, then the Village may toll the time frames for an additional twenty-one days.
(2) If the Village receives more than thirty applications in a thirty-day period, then the Village may toll for an additional fifteen days for every fifteen applications received.
(3) By mutual agreement between the applicant and the Village.
(4) When an applicant submits an underground area waiver pursuant to Section 13(d) of the design guidelines, in which case the Village may toll for an additional fourteen days.
(d) If two applicants request to collocate on the same wireless support structure or two wireless support structures are proposed within a distance that would violate the spacing requirements set forth in Section 1030.16, then the Village Engineer may resolve the conflict in any reasonable and nondiscriminatory manner.
(e) If a request for consent is denied, the Village shall provide, in writing, its reasons for denying the request, supported by substantial, competent evidence. The denial of consent shall not unreasonably discriminate against the applicant. Grounds for denying an application may include, but are not limited to:
(1) Failure to provide information required under Section 1030.07;
(2) Failure to comply with the design guidelines;
(3) Failure to provide financial surety pursuant to Section 1030.15;
(4) Failure to remove abandoned facilities as required under Section 1030.12;
(5) Conflict with the historic nature or character of the surrounding area;
(6) Conflict with planned future improvements in the right-of-way; and
(7) Failure to comply with generally applicable health, safety, and welfare requirements.
(Ord. 2018-61. Passed 7-11-18.)