Formal rules of evidence or procedure which must be followed in a court of law shall not be applied in the consideration of a proposed development agreement under this chapter and the provisions of Chapter 19.12, shall provide the procedure for such consideration. No action, inaction or recommendation regarding the proposed development agreement shall be held void or invalid or be set aside by a court on the ground of the improper admission or rejection of evidence or by reason of any error, irregularity, informality, neglect or omission ("error") as to any matter pertaining to the application, notice, finding, record, hearing, report, recommendation, or any matters of procedure whatever unless after an examination of the entire case, including the evidence, the court finds that the error complained of was prejudicial and that by reason of the error the complaining party sustained and suffered substantial injury, and that a different result would have been probable if the error has not occurred or existed. There is no presumption that error is prejudicial or that injury resulted if error is shown.
(Ord. 14-2125, § 10 (part), 2014; Ord. 2085, § 2 (part), 2011; Ord. 1256, (part), 1984)