§ 91.50 PROCESS FOR ADOPTION OF DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
   (A)   Procedure for adopting, amending, or repealing this chapter.
      (1)   Hearing with published notice. Before adopting, amending, or repealing any ordinance or development regulation authorized by G.S. Chapter 160D, the Town Board of Commissioners shall hold a legislative hearing. A notice of the hearing shall be given once a week for two successive calendar weeks in a newspaper having general circulation in the area. The notice shall be published the first time not less than ten days nor more than 25 days before the date scheduled for the hearing. In computing such period, the day of publication is not to be included but the day of the hearing shall be included.
      (2)   A development regulation adopted pursuant to G.S. Chapter 160D shall be adopted by ordinance.
      (3)   No amendment to zoning regulations or a zoning map that down-zones property shall be initiated shall it be enforceable without the written consent of all property owners whose property is the subject of the down-zoning amendment, unless the down-zoning amendment is initiated by the town.
   (B)   Notice of hearing on proposed zoning map amendments.
      (1)   Mailed notice. This chapter provides for the manner in which zoning regulations and the boundaries of zoning districts are determined, established, and enforced, and from time to time may be amended, or changed, in accordance with the requirements of this section. The owners of affected parcels of land and the owners of all parcels of land abutting that parcel of land shall be mailed a notice of the hearing on a proposed zoning map amendment by first-class mail at the last address listed for such owners on the county tax abstracts. For the purpose of this section, properties are “abutting” even if separated by a street, railroad, or other transportation corridor. This notice must be deposited in the mail at least ten but not more than 25 days prior to the date of the hearing. If the zoning map amendment is being proposed in conjunction with an expansion of the town’s ETJ, a single hearing on the zoning map amendment and the boundary amendment may be held. In this instance, the initial notice of the zoning map amendment hearing may be combined with the boundary hearing notice and the combined hearing notice mailed at least 30 days prior to the hearing.
      (2)   Optional notice for large- scale zoning map amendments. The first class mail notice required under division (B) of this section shall not be required if the zoning map amendment proposes to change the zoning designation of more than 50 properties, owned by at least 50 different property owners, and the town elects to use the expanded published notice provided for in this division. In this instance, the town may elect to make the mailed notice provided for in division (B)(1) or, as an alternative, elect to publish notice of the hearing as required by § 91.50(A), provided that each advertisement shall not be less than one-half of a newspaper page in size. The advertisement shall only be effective for property owners who reside in the area of general circulation of the newspaper that publishes the notice. Property owners who reside outside of the newspaper circulation area, according to the address listed on the most recent property tax listing for the affected property, shall be notified according to the provisions of division(B)(1) above.
      (3)   Posted notice. When a zoning map amendment is proposed, the town shall prominently post a notice of the hearing on the site proposed for the amendment or on an adjacent public street or highway right-of-way. The notice shall be posted within the same time period specified for mailed notices of the hearing. When multiple parcels are included within a proposed zoning map amendment, a posting on each individual parcel is not required but the town shall post sufficient notices to provide reasonable notice to interested persons.
      (4)   Actual notice. Except for town-initiated zoning map amendment, when an application is filed to request a zoning map amendment and that application is not made by the landowner or authorized agent, the applicant shall certify to the town that the owner of the parcel of land as shown on the county tax listing has received actual notice of the proposed amendment and a copy of the notice of the hearing. Actual notice shall be provided in any manner permitted under G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 4(j). If notice cannot with due diligence be achieved by personal delivery, certified mail, or by a designated delivery authorized pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7502(f)(2), notice may be given by publication consistent with G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 4(j1). The person or persons required to provide notice shall certify to the town that actual notice has been provided, and such certificate shall be deemed conclusive in the absence of fraud.
      (C)   Citizen comments. Subject to the limitations of this chapter, zoning regulations may from time to time be amended, supplemented, changed, modified, or repealed. If any resident or property owner in the town submits a written statement regarding a proposed amendment, modification, or repeal to a zoning regulation, including a text or map amendment, to the Town Clerk at least two business days prior to the proposed vote on such change, the Town Clerk shall deliver such written statement to the Board of Commissioners. If the proposed change is the subject of a quasi-judicial proceeding under G.S. § 160D-705 or any other statute, the Town Clerk shall provide only the names and addresses of the individuals providing written comment, and the provision of such names and addresses to all members of the Board shall not disqualify any member of the Board from voting.
   (D)   Planning Board review and comment.
      (1)   Zoning amendments. Subsequent to initial adoption of a zoning regulation, all proposed amendments to the zoning regulations or zoning map shall be submitted to the Planning Board for review and comment. If no written report is received from the Planning Board within 30 days of referral of the amendment to that Board, the Board of Commissioners may act on the amendment without the Planning Board report. The Board of Commissioners is not bound by the recommendations, if any, of the Planning Board.
      (2)   Review of other ordinances and actions. Any development regulations other than a zoning regulation that is proposed to be adopted pursuant to G.S. Chapter 160D may be referred to the Planning Board for review and comment. Any development regulation other than a zoning regulation may provide that future proposed amendments of that ordinance be submitted to the Planning Board for review and comment. Any other action proposed to be taken pursuant to G.S. Chapter 160D may be referred to the Planning Board for review or comment.
      (3)   Plan consistency. When conducting a review of proposed zoning text or map amendments pursuant to this section, the Planning Board shall advise and comment on whether the proposed action is consistent with any comprehensive plan that has been adopted and any other officially adopted plan that is applicable. The Planning Board shall provide a written recommendation to the Board of Commissioners that addresses plan consistency and other matters as deemed appropriate by the Planning Board, but a comment by the Planning Board that a proposed amendment is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan shall not preclude consideration or approval of the proposed amendment by the Board of Commissioners. If a zoning map amendment qualifies as a “large-scale rezoning” under G.S. § 160D-602(b), the Planning Board statement describing plan consistency may address the overall rezoning and describe how the analysis and policies in the relevant adopted plans were considered in the recommendations made.
      (4)   Separate board required. Notwithstanding the authority to assign duties of the Planning Board to the Board of Commissioners as provided by this chapter, the review and comment required by this section shall not be assigned to the Board of Commissioners and must be performed by a separate board.
   (E)   Board of Commissioners statement.
      (1)   Plan consistency. When adopting or rejecting any zoning text or map amendment, the Board of Commissioners shall approve a brief statement describing whether its action is consistent or inconsistent with an adopted comprehensive plan. The requirement for a plan consistency statement may also be met by a clear indication in the minutes of the Board of Commissioners that at the time of action on the amendment the Board was aware of and considered the Planning Board’s recommendations and any relevant portions of an adopted comprehensive plan. If a zoning map amendment is adopted and the action was deemed inconsistent with the adopted plan, the zoning amendment shall have the effect of also amending any future land use map in the approved plan, and no additional application or fee for a plan amendment shall be required. A plan amendment and a zoning amendment may be considered concurrently. The plan consistency amendment is not subject to judicial review. If a zoning map amendment qualifies as a “large scale rezoning” under § 91.50(B), the Board of Commissioners statement describing plan consistency may address the overall rezoning and describe how the analysis and policies in the relevant adopted plans were considered in the action taken.
      (2)   Additional reasonableness statement for rezonings. When adopting or rejecting any petition for a zoning map amendment, a statement analyzing the reasonableness of the proposed rezoning shall be approved by the Board of Commissioners. This statement of reasonableness may consider, among other factors, (i) the size, physical condition, and other attributes of the area proposed to be rezoned, (ii) the benefits and detriments to the landowners, the neighbors, and the surrounding community, (iii) the relationship between the current actual and permissible development on the tract and adjoining areas and the development that would be permissible under the proposed amendment, (iv) why the action taken is in the public interest; and (v) any changed conditions warranting the amendment. If a zoning map amendment qualifies as a “large scale rezoning” under § 91.50(B), the Board of Commissioners statement on reasonableness may address the overall rezoning.
      (3)   Single statement permissible. The statement of reasonableness and the plan consistency statement required by this section may be approved as a single statement.
(Ord. eff. 9-6-2012, § 4.1; Am. Ord. 16-1, passed 4-7-2016; Am. Ord. 21-1, passed 9-17-2020)