Runoff Coefficients for the Rational Method* | ||||||||||||
Hydrologic Soil Group and Slope Range** | ||||||||||||
Land Use | A | B | C | D | ||||||||
0—2 % | 2—6 % | 6%+ | 0—2 % | 2—6 % | 6%+ | 0—2 % | 2—6 % | 6%+ | 0—2 % | 2—6 % | 6%+ |
Runoff Coefficients for the Rational Method* | ||||||||||||
Hydrologic Soil Group and Slope Range** | ||||||||||||
Land Use | A | B | C | D | ||||||||
0—2 % | 2—6 % | 6%+ | 0—2 % | 2—6 % | 6%+ | 0—2 % | 2—6 % | 6%+ | 0—2 % | 2—6 % | 6%+ | |
CultivatedA | a0.18 | 0.23 | 0.28 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.38 | 0.33 | 0.37 | 0.41 |
b0.2 3 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.30 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.36 | 0.41 | 0.45 | 0.39 | 0.44 | 0.48 | |
Forest, woods | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.29 | 0.25 | 0.30 | 0.34 |
0.04 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.21 | 0.26 | 0.25 | 0.31 | 0.36 | 0.31 | 0.37 | 0.41 | |
Gravel | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.35 | 0.39 | 0.43 | 0.37 | 0.41 | 0.44 |
0.30 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.38 | 0.43 | 0.47 | 0.42 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.44 | 0.48 | 0.51 | |
Meadow, lawnC | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.20 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.36 |
0.07 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 0.34 | 0.39 | 0.33 | 0.39 | 0.43 | |
Parking, other impervious | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.87 |
0.95 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.97 | |
PastureB | 0.09 | 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.27 | 0.31 | 0.36 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.39 |
0.12 | 0.17 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.30 | 0.36 | 0.33 | 0.38 | 0.43 | 0.37 | 0.42 | 0.46 | |
Residential, commercial, industrial and other “developed” | Runoff coefficients should be calculated based upon weighted average of impervious area coefficients and pervious area coefficients from above based upon soil type, slope and the particular development proposal | |||||||||||
* Coefficients for all land uses except parking and other impervious cover are based on the Rossmiller Equation for translating NRCS curve number into Rational Method ‘c’ values. The source for the parking and other impervious cover coefficients is RAWLS. W.J., S.L. WONG and R.H. McCUEN, 198. Comparison of urban flood frequency procedures. Preliminary draft report prepared for the Soil Conservation Service, Beltsville. MD. | ||||||||||||
** Hydrologic soil group based on the county soil survey latest edition | ||||||||||||
a Runoff coefficients for storm recurrence intervals less than 25 years | ||||||||||||
b Runoff coefficients for storm recurrence intervals of 25 years or more | ||||||||||||
A Represents average of cultivated land with and without conservation treatment from TR-55, January 1975. These values are consistent with several categories of cultivated lands from TR-55, June 1986 | ||||||||||||
B Represents grasslands in fair condition with 50% to 75% grass cover | ||||||||||||
C Represents grasslands in good condition with greater than 75% grass cover | ||||||||||||
(Ord. 226-2007, passed 5-7-2007)