For the purposes of this chapter, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that an alarm activation was a false security alarm where the responding police officer or personnel determines that: (1) there was no evidence of a crime, or other activity on the alarmed premises warranting a call for immediate police department response; (2) no individual who was on or near the alarmed premises or who had access to an alternate monitoring system from such premises called for police department dispatch or verified a need for any immediate response services; or (3) there was no physical evidence that violent conditions of nature or other extraordinary circumstances beyond the control of the security alarm user caused the activation of the alarm.
(Ord. 2005-60, passed 8-8-05)