§ 10.21 CONFLICTING PROVISIONS.
   (A)   In the event two provisions of this code or any supplementary ordinance are conflicting, mutually contradictory or cannot consistently stand together and be coherently applied, either in general or with respect to any particular matter, then the most recently enacted provision shall prevail and be applied. In the case of any two such conflicting provisions of this code which are re- enacted or restated provisions of any prior ordinances, the most recently enacted provision is that provision which was formerly part of the most recently adopted prior ordinance, notwithstanding the fact the prior ordinance, per se, may have been repealed. ('85 Code, § 1-2-7)
   (B)   This code is, in all respects, subordinate to the laws of the state, except to the extent that any law expressly makes a provision of this code superior; and except in such case, if any provision of this code is found to be prohibited by or in conflict with a provision of any state statute, whether the statute was enacted prior or subsequent to the enactment of the prohibited or conflicting code provision, then the provision of this statute shall prevail. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent the Town Council from enacting any provision which is collateral or supplementary to a statute and any such provision shall be invalid only if and to the extent that it is overtly consistent with a prescriptive or proscriptive provision of the statute, preempts the actual field of operation of a statute, impairs or denies a right, privilege or power conferred on any person by a statute, prevents or impairs any person from performing a duty or other act required to be performed by a statute or contravenes the purpose for which a statute was enacted by the General Assembly; but provided further that no such collateral or supplementary provision shall fix or apply a penalty of fine or other forfeiture for any act or condition which is also a penal violation of any statute.
('85 Code, § 1-2-8)