Skip to code content (skip section selection)
Compare to:
§ 32.1403   Determinations and Notice Process.
   (a)   Determination of Potentially Dangerous or Vicious Animal. If an Animal Control Officer, after conducting an investigation, has determined that there exists probable cause to believe that an animal is potentially dangerous or vicious, he or she shall report the results of his or her investigation in writing to the Chief Officer, who shall review said written report for the purpose of determining whether or not the animal in question is potentially dangerous or vicious.
   (b)   Complaints and Evidence. If the written report submitted by the Animal Control Officer is based on a complaint or complaints received from a member of the public, the Animal Control Officer shall require the complainant to put the complaint in writing and sign it under penalty of perjury, so that it may be offered as evidence at the Review Hearing described below. The Animal Control Officer may also include in said report to the Chief Officer:
      (1)   If known, the animal’s previous history of biting, attacking, or causing injury to a human being or animal;
      (2)   The nature and extent of injuries inflicted and the behavior of victims involved;
      (3)   The place where the bite, attack or injury occurred;
      (4)   The presence or absence of any provocation for the bite, attack or injury;
      (5)   The extent to which property has been damaged or destroyed;
      (6)   The extent to which the animal exhibits characteristics of aggressive or unpredictable temperament or behavior in the presence of human beings or domestic animals; and
      (7)   The extent to which the animal exhibits any characteristics of being trained for fighting or attack and any evidence tending to show such training.
   (c)   Hearing Before and Determination of Chief Officer.
      (1)   If the Chief Officer, after examining the written report of the Animal Control Officer, determines that probable cause exists that the animal is potentially dangerous or vicious, he or she shall mail a written notice to the owner or keeper of the animal of a hearing to be presided over by the Chief Officer for the purpose of determining whether or not the animal should be declared potentially dangerous or vicious, which notice shall be mailed by first class mail, postage prepaid, not less than 14 days before the date set for the hearing, at which time the owner or keeper of the animal shall be given an opportunity to present evidence as to why the animal should not be declared potentially dangerous or vicious.
      (2)   At the hearing, the Chief Officer shall review all relevant evidence, including the written report of the Animal Control Officer and any evidence submitted by the owner or keeper. Following the hearing, the Chief Officer shall prepare a written notice of determination as to whether or not the animal is potentially dangerous or vicious, and make whatever other orders are authorized by this Chapter, and shall mail said notice of determination to the owner or keeper by first class mail, postage prepaid. The Chief Officer shall decide all issues for or against the owner or keeper of the animal if the owner or keeper fails to appear at a scheduled determination hearing, and such determination shall be final and conclusive and not subject to further review.
   (d)   Notice of Determination and Review Hearing.
      (1)   If a determination is made by the Chief Officer that the animal is potentially dangerous or vicious, the owner or keeper shall comply with § 32.1405 in accordance with a time schedule established by the Chief Officer, but in no case more than 30 days after the date of mailing of the notice of determination.
      (2)   If the owner or keeper of the animal appeared at the hearing and contests the determination, he or she may request a review hearing of the decision of the Chief Officer. A written request for review must be actually received in the Office of the Chief Officer within ten days of the mailing of the notice of determination, or the right to review shall be deemed waived and the notice of determination of the Chief Officer shall be final for all purposes.
      (3)   Upon receipt of a request for review, the Chief Officer shall convene an Administrative Review Panel to review the case. The Chief Officer shall mail a written notice to the owner or keeper of the animal of a hearing before and Administrative Review Panel for the purpose of reviewing the Chief Officer’s notice of determination that the animal should be declared potentially dangerous or vicious, which notice shall be mailed by first class mail, postage prepaid, not less than 14 days before the date set for the hearing, at which time the owner or keeper of the animal shall be given an opportunity to present evidence as to why the Chief Officer’s notice of determination that the animal should be declared potentially dangerous or vicious is erroneous.
      At the review hearing, the Panel shall review the Chief Officer’s notice of determination, and, if it deems it appropriate, all relevant evidence considered by Chief Officer at the prior hearing. The Panel shall submit a written recommendation to the Health Officer regarding the appropriateness of the notice of determination of the Chief Officer and/or disposition of the subject animal, and shall mail a copy of said written recommendation to the owner or keeper by first class mail, postage prepaid. The Administrative Review Panel may issue recommendations for or against the owner or keeper of the animal if the owner or keeper fails to appear at a scheduled review hearing, and such recommendations shall be final and conclusive and not subject to further review.
      (4)   The Administrative Review Panel shall consist of three members which shall be appointed by the Chief Officer: a representative of the Animal Care and Control Program, but not the investigating officer or an officer with knowledge of the case; a representative of a private veterinary or animal care provider; and a representative of another public animal control agency.
      (5)   If the owner or keeper of the animal appeared at all hearings, the Health Officer shall review the Chief Officer’s notice of determination and the Administrative Review Panel’s recommendations thereon and make a finding as to whether or not the animal is potentially dangerous or vicious, and make such other orders authorized by this Chapter, and shall mail a copy of said findings and orders to the owner or keeper by first class mail, postage prepaid.
      The findings and orders of the Health Officer shall be final and conclusive upon all parties. If the Health Officer determines that an animal is potentially dangerous or vicious, the Health Officer may establish a time schedule to ensure compliance with this Chapter, but in no case more than 30 days subsequent to the date of the mailing of the Health Officer’s findings and orders.
   (e)   Exceptions.
      (1)   An animal may be found not potentially dangerous or vicious if the Chief Officer, Administrative Review Panel or Health Officer reasonably determines any of the following:
         (A)   Any injury or damage was sustained by a person who, at the time the injury or damage was sustained, was committing a willful trespass upon the premises occupied by the owner or keeper of the animal or was committing or attempting to commit a crime upon the premises;
         (B)   The person who sustained the injury or damage was teasing, tormenting, abusing or assaulting the animal at the time;
         (C)   The animal was protecting or defending a person within the immediate vicinity of the animal from an attack, assault, battery, crime or attempt to commit an attack, assault, battery or crime by the person who sustained the injury; or
         (D)   Any injury or damage was sustained by a domestic animal, which, at the time the injury or damage was sustained, was teasing, tormenting, abusing or assaulting the animal.
      (2)   No dog may be declared potentially dangerous or vicious if the injury or damage to a domestic animal was sustained while the dog was working as a hunting, herding, or a predator control dog and it was on the property of, or under the control of, its owner or keeper and the damage or injury was to a species or type of domestic animal appropriate to the work of the dog.
(Ord. 3804, passed - -2000)