Loading...
In the event that the Village Administrator believes that grounds exist for revocation of a license or franchise, he shall give the grantee written notice of the apparent violation or noncompliance, providing a short and concise statement of the nature and general facts of the violation or noncompliance, and providing the grantee a reasonable period of time not exceeding 30 days to furnish evidence:
(A) That corrective action has been, or is being actively and expeditiously pursued, to remedy the violation or noncompliance.
(B) That rebuts the alleged violation or noncompliance.
(C) That it would be in the public interest to impose some penalty or sanction less than revocation.
(Ord. 96-15, passed 4-3-96)
In the event that a grantee falls to provide evidence reasonably satisfactory to the Village Administrator as provided in this section, the Administrator shall refer the apparent violation or non- compliance to the corporate authorities. The corporate authorities shall provide the grantee with notice and a reasonable opportunity to be heard concerning the matter.
(Ord. 96-15, passed 4-3-96)
If persuaded that the grantee has violated or failed to comply with material provisions of this chapter, or of a franchise or license agreement, the corporate authorities shall determine whether to revoke the license or franchise, or to establish some lesser sanction and cure, considering the nature, circumstances, extent and gravity of the violation as reflected by one or more of the following factors:
(A) Whether the misconduct was egregious.
(B) Whether substantial harm resulted.
(C) Whether the violation was intentional.
(D) Whether there is a history of prior violations of the same or other requirements.
(E) Whether there is a history of overall compliance.
(F) Whether the violation was voluntarily disclosed, admitted or cured.
(Ord. 96-15, passed 4-3-96)
Loading...