(A) No person may intentionally do any of the following:
(1) Obtain or attempt to obtain cable television service from a company by trick, artifice, deception, use of an illegal device or illegal decoder or other fraudulent means with the intent to deprive that company of any or all lawful compensation for rendering each type of service obtained. The intent required for a violation of this division (A)(1) may be inferred from the presence on the property and in the actual possession of the defendant of a device not authorized by the cable television company, the major purpose of which is to permit reception of cable television services without payment. This inference is rebutted if the defendant demonstrates that he or she or she purchased that device for a legitimate use;
(2) Give technical assistance or instruction to any person in obtaining or attempting to obtain any cable television service without payment of all lawful compensation to the company providing that service. This division (A)(2) does not apply if the defendant demonstrates that the technical assistance or instruction was given or the installation of the connection, descrambler or receiving device was for a legitimate use;
(3) Make or maintain a connection, whether physical, electrical, mechanical, acoustical or by other means, with any cables, wires, components or other devices used for the distribution of cable television services for the purpose of distributing cable television service to any other dwelling unit without authority from a cable television company;
(4) Make or maintain a connection, whether physical, electrical, mechanical, acoustical or by other means, with any cables, wires, components or other devices used for the distribution of cable television services for the purpose of obtaining cable television service without payment of all lawful compensation to the company providing the service. The intent required for a violation of this division (A)(4) may be inferred from proof that the cable service to the defendant’s residence or business was connected under a service agreement with the defendant and has been disconnected by the cable television company and that thereafter there exists in fact a connection to the cable system at the defendant’s residence or business;
(5) Make or maintain any modification or alteration to any device installed with the authorization of a cable television company for the purpose of intercepting or receiving any program or other service carried by that company which that person is not authorized by that company to receive. The intent required for a violation of this division (A)(5) may be inferred from proof that, as a matter of standard procedure, the cable television company places written warning labels on its converters or decoders explaining that the tampering with the device is a violation of law and that the converter or decoder is found to have been tampered with, altered or modified so as to allow the reception or interception of programming carried by the cable television company without authority to do so. The trier of fact may also infer that a converter or decoder has been altered or modified from proof that the cable television company, as a matter of standard procedure, seals the converters or decoders with a label or mechanical device, that the seal was shown to the customer upon delivery of the decoder and that the seal has been removed or broken. The inferences under this division (A)(5) are rebutted if the cable television company cannot demonstrate that the intact seal was shown to the customer;
(6) Possess without authority any device or printed circuit board designed to receive from a cable television system any cable television programming or services offered for sale over that cable television system, whether or not the programming or services are encoded, filtered, scrambled or otherwise made unintelligible, or perform or facilitate the performance of any of the acts under divisions (A)(1) through (A)(5) above with the intent that that device or printed circuit be used to receive that cable television company’s services without payment. Intent to violate this division (A)(6) for direct or indirect commercial advantage or private financial gain may be inferred from proof of the existence on the property and in the actual possession of the defendant of a device if the totality of circumstances, including quantities or volumes, indicates possession for resale; and
(7) Manufacture, import into this state, distribute, publish, advertise, sell, lease or offer for sale or lease any device, printed circuit board or any plan or kit for a device or for a printed circuit designed to receive the cable television programming or services offered for sale over a cable television system from a cable television system, whether or not the programming or services are encoded, filtered, scrambled or otherwise made unintelligible, with the intent that the device, printed circuit, plan or kit be used for the reception of that company’s services without payment. The intent required for a violation of this division (A)(7) may be inferred from proof that the defendant has sold, leased or offered for sale or lease any device, printed circuit board, plan or kit for a device or for a printed circuit board in violation of this division (A)(7) and during the course of the transaction for sale or lease the defendant expressly states or implies to the buyer that the product will enable the buyer to obtain cable television service without charge.
(B) Civil liability for theft of cable television service.
(1) Any person who incurs injury as a result of a violation of § 113.999 may bring a civil action against the person who committed the violation.
(2) If the person who incurs the loss prevails against a person who committed the violation wilfully and for the purpose of commercial advantage or prevails against a person who has committed more than one violation of § 113.999, the court may grant the prevailing party any or all the following:
(a) Except as provided in division (B)(2)(e), not more than $10,000 per violation;
(b) Actual damages;
(c) Any profits of the violators that are attributable to the violation and that are not taken into account in determining the amount of actual damages under division (B)(2)(b) above;
(d) Notwithstanding the limitations under the Illinois Compiled Statutes, costs, disbursement and reasonable attorney fees; and
(e) If the court finds that the violation was committed wilfully and for the purpose of commercial advantage, the court may increase the amount granted under division (B)(2)(a) above not to exceed $50,000 per violation.
(3) If damages under division (B)(2)(c) above are requested, the party who committed the violation shall be required to provide information on the violator’s gross revenues, the violator’s deductible expenses and the elements of profit attributable to factors other than the violation.
(4) In addition to other remedies available under this section, the courts may grant the injured party a temporary or permanent injunction.
(2000 Code, § 113.46) (Ord. 1678, passed 7-21-1997) Penalty, see § 113.999