(a) The city council finds and determines as follows:
(1) The federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 preempts and declares invalid all state rules that restrict entry or limit competition in both local and long-distance telephone service.
(2) The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) is primarily responsible for the implementation of local telephone competition, and it issues certificates of public convenience and necessity to new entrants that are qualified to provide competitive local telephone exchange services and related telecommunications service, whether using their own facilities or the facilities or services provided by other authorized telephone corporations.
(3) Section 234(a) of the California Public Utilities Code defines a “telephone corporation” as “every corporation or person owning, controlling, operating, or managing any telephone line for compensation within this state.”
(4) Section 616 of the California Public Utilities Code provides that a telephone corporation “may condemn any property necessary for the construction and maintenance of its telephone line.”
(5) Section 2902 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes municipal corporations to retain their powers of control to supervise and regulate the relationships between a public utility and the general public in matters affecting the health, convenience and safety of the general public, including matters such as the use and repair of public streets by any public utility and the location of the poles, wires, mains or conduits of any public utility on, under or above any public streets.
(6) Section 7901 of the California Public Utilities Code authorizes telephone and telegraph corporations to construct telephone or telegraph lines along and upon any public road or highway, along or across any of the waters or lands within this state, and to erect poles, posts, piers or abatements for supporting the insulators, wires, and other necessary fixtures of their lines, in such manner and at such points as not to incommode the public use of the road or highway or interrupt the navigation of the waters.
(7) Section 7901.1 of the California Public Utilities Code confirms the right of municipalities to exercise reasonable control as to the time, place and manner in which roads, highways and waterways are accessed, which control must be applied to all entities in an equivalent manner, and may involve the imposition of fees.
(8) Section 50030 of the California Government Code provides that any permit fee imposed by a city for the placement, installation, repair or upgrading of telecommunications facilities, such as lines, poles or antennas, by a telephone corporation that has obtained all required authorizations from the CPUC and the FCC to provide telecommunications services, must not exceed the reasonable costs of providing the service for which the fee is charged, and must not be levied for general revenue purposes.
(b) In recognition of and in compliance with the statutory authorizations and requirements set forth above in subsection (a) of this section, the following regulatory provisions are applicable to a telephone corporation that desires to provide telecommunications service by means of facilities that are proposed to be constructed within the city’s public rights-of-way:
(1) The telephone corporation must apply for and obtain, as may be applicable, an excavation permit, an encroachment permit, or a building permit (“ministerial permit”);
(2) In addition to the information required by this code in connection with an application for a ministerial permit, a telephone corporation must submit to the city the following supplemental information:
(A) A copy of the certificate of public convenience and necessity issued by the CPUC to the applicant, and a copy of the CPUC decision that authorizes the applicant to provide the telecommunications service for which the facilities are proposed to be constructed in the city’s public rights-of-way,
(B) If the applicant has obtained from the CPUC a certificate of public convenience to operate as a competitive local carrier, the following additional requirements are applicable:
(i) As required by Decision No. 95-12-057 of the CPUC, the applicant must establish that it has timely filed with the city a quarterly report that describes the type of construction and the location of each construction project proposed to be undertaken in the city during the calendar quarter in which the application is filed, which information is sufficient to enable the city to coordinate multiple projects, as may be necessary,
(ii) If the applicant’s proposed construction project will extend beyond the utility rights-of- way into undisturbed areas or other rights-of-way, the applicant must establish that is has filed a petition with the CPUC to amend its certificate of public convenience and necessity and that the proposed construction project has been subjected to a full-scale environmental analysis by the CPUC, as required by Decision No. 95-12-057 of the CPUC,
(iii) The applicant must inform the city whether its proposed construction project will be subject to any of the mitigation measures specified in the negative declaration [“Competitive Local Carriers” (CLCs) Projects for Local Exchange Communication Service throughout California”] or to the mitigation monitoring plan adopted in connection with Decision No. 95- 12-057 of the CPUC. The city’s issuance of a ministerial permit will be conditioned upon the applicant’s compliance with all applicable mitigation measures and monitoring requirements imposed by the CPUC upon telephone corporations that are designated as competitive local carriers.
(c) In recognition of the fact that numerous excavations in the public rights-of-way diminish the useful life of the surface pavement, and for the purpose of mitigating the adverse impacts of numerous excavations on the quality and longevity of public street maintenance within the city, the following policies and procedures are adopted:
(1) The city manager is directed to ensure that all public utilities, including telephone corporations, comply with all local design, construction, maintenance and safety standards that are contained within, or are related to, a ministerial permit that authorizes the construction of facilities within the public rights-of-way;
(2) The city manager is directed to coordinate the construction and installation of facilities by public utilities, including telephone corporations, in order to minimize the number of excavations in the public rights-of-way. In this regard, based upon projected plans for street construction or renovation projects, the city manager is authorized to establish on a quarterly basis one or more construction time periods or “windows” for the installation of facilities within the public rights-of-way. Telephone corporations and other public utilities that submit applications for ministerial permits to construct facilities after a predetermined date may be required to delay such construction until the next quarterly “window” that is established by the city.
(Ord. 760 § 2 (part), 1998)