Loading...
(A) Discontinued operations. A registrant who has determined to discontinue all or a portion of its operations in the city must provide information satisfactory to the city that the registrant’s obligations for its facilities in the right-of-way under this chapter have been lawfully assumed by another registrant.
(B) Removal. Any registrant who has abandoned facilities in any right-of-way shall remove it from that right-of-way if required in conjunction with other right-of-way repair, excavation, or construction, unless this requirement is waived by the city.
A right-of-way user that has been denied registration, has been denied a permit, has had a permit revoked, believes that the fees imposed are not in conformity with M.S. § 237.163, subd. 6, as it may be amended from time to time, or disputes a determination of the city regarding § 95.16(B) may have the denial, revocation, fee imposition, or decision reviewed, upon written request, by the City Council. The City Council shall act on a timely written request at its next regularly scheduled meeting, provided the right-of-way user has submitted its appeal with sufficient time to include the appeal as a regular agenda item. A decision by the City Council affirming the denial, revocation, or fee imposition will be in writing and supported by written findings establishing the reasonableness of the decision.