(a) General. The Board has the power to act on matters as provided in this article and Act 267 of the Public Acts of 1921, as amended. The specific powers of the Board are enumerated in the following subsections.
(b) Voting. The concurring vote of a majority of the members of the Board shall be necessary to reverse an order, requirement, decision, or determination of an administrative official or body, or to decide in favor of the applicant on a matter upon which the Board is required to pass under this Ordinance, or to effect a variation in an ordinance, except that a concurring vote of two-thirds (2/3) of the members of the Board shall be necessary to grant a variance from uses of land permitted in this Ordinance.
A member shall be disqualified from a vote in which there is a conflict of interest. Failure of a member to disclose a conflict of interest and be disqualified from a vote shall constitute misconduct in office. Additionally, a BZA member who also sits on the Planning Commission is prohibited from participating in a public hearing or voting on the same matter that they voted on with the other body.
(c) Administrative Review. The Board shall hear and decide appeals where it is alleged by the appellant that there is error in any order, requirement, permit decision, or refusal made by the Zoning Administrator or other duly authorized enforcing agent in enforcing any provision of this Zoning Ordinance.
(d) Interpretation.
(1) The Board shall hear and decide requests for interpretation of this Zoning Ordinance or the zoning map, taking into consideration the intent and purpose of this Zoning Ordinance and the Master Plan.
(2) A record shall be kept by the Board of all decisions for interpretation of this Zoning Ordinance or the zoning map and land uses which are approved under the terms of this Zoning Ordinance. The Board shall request the Planning Commission to review any ordinance amendment it deems necessary.
(e) Variance. Upon an appeal, the Board is authorized to grant a variance from the strict provisions of this Zoning Ordinance, whereby extraordinary or exceptional conditions exist for with the strict application of the regulations enacted would result in peculiar or exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional undue hardship upon, the owner of such property, provided such relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of this Zoning Ordinance. In granting a variance, the Board may attach thereto such conditions regarding the location, character and other features of the proposed uses as it may deem reasonable in furtherance of the purpose of this Zoning Ordinance. Further, in granting a variance, the Board shall state the grounds upon which it justifies the granting of a variance as outlined below. When granting any variance, the Board must ensure that the spirit of this Zoning Ordinance is observed, public safety secured, and substantial justice done.
(1) Use Variances. The applicant must present evidence to show that if the Zoning Ordinance is applied strictly, unnecessary hardship to the applicant will result, and that all four (4) of the following requirements are met:
A. That the property could not be reasonably used for the purposes permitted in that zoning district;
B. That the appeal results from unique circumstances peculiar to the property and not from general neighborhood conditions;
C. That the use requested by the variance would not alter the essential character of the area; and
D. That the alleged hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property.
(2) Non Use Variances. The applicant must present evidence to show that if the Zoning Ordinance is applied strictly, practical difficulties will result to the applicant, including all four (4) of the following:
A. The restrictions of this Zoning Ordinance unreasonably prevent the owner from using the property for a permitted purpose or would render conformity unnecessarily burdensome;
B. The variance would do substantial justice to the applicant as well as to other property owners in the district and a lesser relaxation than that requested would not give substantial relief to the owner of the property and be more consistent with justice to other property owners;
C. The plight of the landowner is due to the unique circumstances of the property.
D. The alleged hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property.