(A) In order to ensure that the city is taking timely and effective enforcement actions, two tools will be employed - an enforcement response guide in subsection (C) and an enforcement flowchart. The purpose of the enforcement response guide (ERG) is to identify initial responses and time frames for each of the types of violations discussed in § 51.132. Once the enforcement action is taken, the flow chart is used to identify the more punitive action which would be taken if the SIU failed to return to compliance as a result of the previous or initial action.
(B) As an example of how the ERG and flowchart can be used to determine appropriate enforcement responses, consider an SIU which submits a self-monitoring report which shows a violation. The ERG tells the Pretreatment Coordinator to issue a notice of noncompliance within 14 days. The notice will require the SIU to collect additional data to confirm compliance or noncompliance. The next step is to determine if the SIU is in reportable noncompliance (RNC) at the end of the six month reporting period. As indicated by the flow chart, if the data does not show RNC, no action is required. If the data does show RNC, a notice of violation (NOV) is issued. The ERG tells the Pretreatment Coordinator that, in response to RNC with permit limits, an NOV assessing a fine of $100 should be sent within 30 days of receiving all of the data. The NOV requires the SIU to respond by indicating the cause and time needed to correct the violation. If the time needed to correct the violation was greater than 90 days, a consent order would be drafted. Hopefully the SIU would comply with the consent order and the violation would be resolved. However, if the SIU failed to meet the compliance date of the consent order, the flow chart indicates that a notice to comply should be issued and the ERG gives the Pretreatment Coordinator information on time frames, penalties, and responses which should be included in the notice to comply. By using the flowchart and ERG, a worst case scenario can be followed in a similar manner through the issuance and violation of an administrative order, through a show cause meeting and, eventually, to termination of service.
(C) Action chart. Chart begins on the following page.
Enforcement Response Plan Action Chart
| |||||
Type of Violation
|
POTW Action
|
Timeframe
|
Responsible Official
|
Expected Action from User
|
Escalated Action if Needed
|
Enforcement Response Plan Action Chart
| |||||
Type of Violation
|
POTW Action
|
Timeframe
|
Responsible Official
|
Expected Action from User
|
Escalated Action if Needed
|
Unpermitted Discharges | |||||
Unpermitted discharge; unaware of requirement | Notice of violation | Within 14 days of discovery of discharge | Pretreatment Coordinator | File Permit Application | Suspend service until permit is issued |
Unpermitted discharge; aware of requirement | Notice of violation with penalty assessed | Within 30 days of discovery of discharge | Director | File permit application | Suspend service until permit is issued |
Unpermitted discharge results in NRDES violation | Order to cease process causing violation; Notice of violation with recommended minimum of $1,000 and up to $25,000 per day per violation penalty | Order to cease immediately; Notice of violation within 7 days | Director | File permit application; Steps taken to avoid violation | Suspend service until permit is issued |
Unpermitted discharge results in endangerment | Suspend service; Notice of violation with recommended minimum of $1,000 and up to $25,000 per day per violation penalty | Suspend service immediately; Notice of violation within 7 days | Director | File permit application; Steps taken to avoid future endangerment | Permit Limits Violations |
Permit limits violation; Single event; Minor | Notice of non-compliance or notice of violation with $0 to $25,000 penalty | Within 14 days of receiving data (once in each 6-month period) | Pretreatment Coordinator | Conduct additional monitoring and return to compliance | Notice of violation with penalty |
Permit limits violation; Technical review criteria (TRC) | Notice of violation with $0 to $25,000 penalty | Within 14 days of receiving data (once in each 6-month period) | Pretreatment Coordinator | Conduct additional monitoring and return to compliance | Second notice of violation with increased penalty |
Permit limits violation; significant non-compliance | Notice of violation with $0 to $25,000 penalty | Within 30 days of receiving all the data | Pretreatment Coordinator | Report cause non-compliance and steps taken to prevent violation | Suspend service until resolved; Enforceable schedule (AO) if not resolved by the end of 2nd 6-month period |
Permit limits violation causes NPDES violation | Order to cease process causing violation; Notice of violation with recommended minimum $1,000 and up to $25,000 per day per violation penalty | Order to cease immediately; Notice of violation within 7 days of discovering violation (once in each 6-month period) | Director | Report cause of non-compliance and steps taken to prevent violation | Suspend service until resolved; Enforceable schedule (AO) if not resolved by the end of 2nd 6-month period |
Permit limits; violation causes endangerment | Suspend service; notice of violation with a recommended minimum of $1,000 and up to $25,000 per day per violation penalty | Suspend service immediately; Notice of violation within 7 days | Director | File for reissuance of permit | Other Violations |
Self-monitoring violations | Notice of violation with recommended minimum penalty equal or greater than cost of missing testing | Within 14 days of discovering (once in each 6-month period) | Pretreatment Coordinator | Conduct missed sampling | Second notice of violation with penalty equal to twice the cost of missed testing |
Reporting violation; late report | Notice of non-compliance | Within 14 days of the report due date (once in each 6-month period) | Pretreatment Coordinator | Submit report | Notice of violation; penalty assessed possible SNC if over 30 days |
Reporting violations; Incomplete or inaccurate reports | Notice of non-compliance | Within 30 days of report submission (once in each 6-month period) | Pretreatment Coordinator | Submit revised report | Notice of violation; Penalty assessed |
Reporting violations; Intentional falsification | Referred to district attorney | As, soon as suspected | Director | ||
Violation of permit conditions | Notice of violation with penalty up to $25,000 per day per violation | Within 30 days of discovery (once in each 6-month period) | Pretreatment Coordinator or Director | Varies | Second notice of violation with increased penalty |
Violation of permit conditions (endangerment) | Suspend service; notice of violation with up to $25,000 per day per violation penalty | Suspend service immediately; Notice of violation within 7 days | Director | Steps taken to avoid reoccurrence | Violations of enforcement order; Conditions or limitsNotice of violation assess stipulated penalty and actions listed for same violation type in ERPWithin time frame listed in enforcement order or for the same type of violation in ERPPretreatment Coordinator or DirectorAdditional monitoring and steps taken to avoid recurrenceSame as escalated action for same type of violation possible revocation of order |
Failure to meet a milestone date in enforcement order (does not affect other dates) | Notice of violation and assess penalty stipulated in order | Within 14 days of discovery | Pretreatment Coordinator | Submit a schedule to complete the requirement | Show cause hearing |
Failure to meet a milestone date in an enforcement order (affects other dates) | Show cause hearing and assess stipulated penalties | Within 30 days of discovery | Director | Negotiate new order and abide by new conditions | Possible termination of service |
Failure to meet final compliance date | Notice of violation and assess stipulated penalties | Within 14 days of discovery | Director | Document compliance | Possible termination of service |
(Ord. 1994-79, passed 11-21-94; Ord. 2007-45, passed 6-4-07; Agenda Memorandum, passed 7-18-11)