(A) A proposed extension which has been classified not feasible shall not be presented to the City Commissioners for consideration. Such an application may be modified and resubmitted to the City Clerk as a new application, in which case the City Clerk shall collect an application fee, the same as if the modified application were an original application.
(B) A proposed extension which has been classified feasible shall be presented to the City Commissioners by the City Manager as soon as practicable after the City Manager’s receipt of a copy of the consulting engineer’s report. The applicant may be in attendance at this meeting. The applicant shall be afforded an opportunity at the meeting, to be heard by the Commission concerning the proposed extension and shall be subject to examination thereon.
(C) After the applicant has been afforded an opportunity to be heard concerning the requested extension, the Commissioners shall, by appropriate motion as seconded, vote by the majority of the members thereof in attendance and approve or deny the application for extension of the city’s sanitary sewer facilities.
(D) The City Clerk shall record the approval or disapproval of the application in the minutes of the meeting and shall note the approval or disapproval upon the face of the application. The City Clerk shall forthwith notify the applicant of the City Commissioners’ action by certified mail, with return receipt requested. Any approval made by the Commissioners under this section shall be conditioned upon the applicant’s compliance with the provision of § 55.019.
(Ord. 610.1-07-08-13, passed 7-8-2013)