§ 4-6-67 ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE PLAN.
   The Enforcement Response Plan dated August 1, 1995, and all revisions are hereby made a part of this Sewer Pretreatment Title.
(Ord. CM-93-34, passed 12-13-1993)
CITY OF DILLON ENFORCEMENT RESPONSE PLAN
AUGUST 1, 1995
A. UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGES (No permit)
NONCOMPLIANCE
NATURE OF THE VIOLATION
ENFORCEMENT RESPONSES
PERSONNEL
A. UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGES (No permit)
NONCOMPLIANCE
NATURE OF THE VIOLATION
ENFORCEMENT RESPONSES
PERSONNEL
1.
Unpermitted discharge
IU unaware of requirement; no harm to POTW/environment
Phone call; NOV with application form
PC
IU unaware of requirement; harm to POTW
- AO with fine
PC
- Civil action
S
Failure to apply continues after notice by the POTW
- Civil action
S
- Criminal investigation
S
- Terminate service
S
2.
Nonpermitted discharge
(failure to renew)
IU has not submitted application within 10 days
Phone call; NOV
PC
B. DISCHARGE PERMIT VIOLATION
1.
Exceedance of local or
Federal Standard
(permit limit)
Isolated, not significant
Phone call; NOV
I, PC
Isolated, significant (no harm)
AO to develop spill prevention plan and fine
PC
Isolated, harm to POTW or environment
- Show cause order
PC, S
- Civil action
S
Recurring, no harm to POTW/environment
AO with fine
PC
Recurring; Significant (harm)
AO with fine
PC
- Show cause order
PC, S
- Civil action
S
- Terminate service
S
C. MONITORING AND REPORTING VIOLATIONS
1.
Reporting violation
Report is improperly signed or certified
Phone call or NOV
PC
Report is improperly signed or certified after notice by POTW
- AO
PC
- Show cause order
PC, S
Isolated, not significant (e.g., 5 days late)
Phone call; NOV
I, PC
Significant (e.g., report 30 days or more late)
AO to submit with fine per additional day
PC
Reports are always late or no reports at all
- AO with fine
PC
- Show cause order
PC, S
- Civil action
S
Failure to report spill or changed discharge (no harm)
NOV
PC
Failure to report spill or changed discharge (results in harm)
- AO with fine
PC
- Civil action
S
Repeated failure to report spills
- Show cause order
PC, S
- Terminate service
S
Falsification
- Criminal investigation
S
- Terminate service
S
2.
Failure to monitor correctly
Failure to monitor all pollutants as required by permit
NOV or AO
PC
Recurring failure to monitor
- AO with fine
PC
- Civil action
S
3.
Improper sampling
Evidence of intent
- Criminal investigation
S
- Terminate service
S
4.
Failure to install monitoring equipment
Delay of less than 30 days
NOV
PC
Delay of 30 days or more
AO to install with line for each additional day
PC
Recurring, violation of AO
- Civil action
PC
- Criminal investigation
S
- Terminate service
S
5.
Compliance Schedules (in permit)
Missed milestone by less than 30 days, or will not affect final milestone
NOV or AO with fine
PC
Missed milestone by more than 30 days, or will affect final milestone (good cause for delay)
AO with fine
PC
Missed milestone by more than 30 days, or will affect final miles stone (no good cause for delay)
- Show cause order
PC, S
- Civil action
S
- Terminate service
S
Recurring violation or violation of schedule in AO
- Civil action
S
- Criminal investigation
S
- Terminate service
S
E. OTHER PERMIT VIOLATIONS
1.
Wastestreams are diluted in lieu of treatment
Initial violation
AO with fine
PC
Recurring
- Show cause order
PC, S
- Terminate service
S
2.
Failure to mitigate noncompliance or halt production
Does not result in harm
NOV
PC
Does result in harm
- AO with fine
PC
- Civil action
S
3.
Failure to properly operate and maintain pretreatment facility
See No. 2 above
F. VIOLATIONS DETECTED DURING SITE VISITS
1.
Entry Denial
Entry denied or consent withdrawn, copies of records needed
Obtain warrant and return to IU
I
2.
Illegal Discharge
No harm to POTW or environment
AO with fine
PC
Discharges causes harm or evidence or intent/negligence
- Civil action
S
- Criminal investigation
S
Recurring violation of AO
Terminate service
S
3.
Improper sampling
Unintentional sampling at incorrect location
NOV
I, PC
Unintentionally using incorrect sample type
NOV
I, PC
Unintentionally using incorrect sample collection techniques
NOV
I, PC
4.
Inadequate record keeping
Inspector finds files incomplete to missing (no evidence of intent)
NOV
I, PC
Recurring
AO with fine
PC
5.
Failure to report additional monitoring
Inspection finds additional files
NOV
I, PC
Recurring
AO with fine
PC
G. TIMEFRAMES FOR RESPONSES
1.
All violations will be identified and documented within five days of receiving compliance information.
2.
Initial enforcement responses (involving contact with the industrial user and requesting information on corrective or preventative action(s) will occur within 15 days of violation detection.
3.
Follow up actions for continuing or reoccurring violations will be taken within 60 days of the initial enforcement response. For all continuing violations, the response will include a compliance schedule.
4.
Violations which threaten health, property or environmental quality are considered emergencies and will receive immediate responses such as halting the discharge or terminating service.
5.
All violations meeting the criteria for significant noncompliance will be addressed with an enforceable order within 30 days of the identification of significant noncompliance.
H. DESCRIPTION OF TERMS
Terms and abbreviations used in the plan are defined below:
H. DESCRIPTION OF TERMS
Terms and abbreviations used in the plan are defined below:
AO
Administrative Order.
Civil Litigation
Civil litigation against the industrial user seeking equitable relief monetary penalties and actual damages.
Criminal Prosecution
Pursuing punitive measures against an individual and/or organization through a court of law.
Fine
Monetary penalty assessed by control Authority officials. Fines should be assessed by the pretreatment coordinator or the POTW Superintendent.
I
Inspector.
IU
Industrial User.
Meeting
Informal compliance meeting with the IU to resolve recurring noncompliance.
NOV
Notice of Violation.
PC
Pretreatment Coordinator.
S
Superintendent.
SV
Significant Violation.
Show Cause
Formal meeting requiring the IU to appear and demonstrate why the Control authority should not take a proposed enforcement action against it. The meeting may also serve as a forum to discuss corrective actions and compliance schedules.