The city’s Appeal Authority shall consist of five members and whatever number of alternate members that the Mayor considers appropriate, each to be appointed by the Mayor for the term of five years; provided that, the term of one member shall expire each year. Any member or alternate member may be removed for cause by the appointing authority upon written charges and after a public hearing if such public hearing is requested. Vacancy shall be filled for the unexpired term of any member or alternate member whose term becomes vacant.
(A) Organization and meetings.
(1) The Appeal Authority shall adopt bylaws for the regulation of its procedure and the conduct of its duties not inconsistent with the provisions of this chapter or of the Utah Code. Such bylaws, to become effective, shall first be approved by the City Council.
(2) Decisions of the Appeal Authority shall become effective at the meeting in which the decision is made, unless a different time is designated in the Appeal Authority’s rules.
(B) Powers and duties. The Appeal Authority shall have the following powers:
(1) Appeals. Hear and decide appeals from any order, requirement, determination or decision of the Land Use Authority and/or Community Development Staff’s application of the city’s land use ordinances. An appeal may not be used to waive or modify the terms or requirements of the city’s land use ordinances;
(2) Special exceptions. Hear and decide special exceptions to the terms of the zoning ordinance where the City Council has granted jurisdiction to the Appeal Authority to do so. The Appeal Authority may hear and decide special exceptions only if authorized to do so by the zoning ordinance and based only upon the standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance;
(3) Variances. Hear and decide all applications for variance from the terms of the zoning ordinance other than allowing a use variance. Such decisions shall be made in accordance with state law, this section and the rules adopted by the Appeal Authority; and
(4) Non-conforming use. Hear and make determinations regarding the existence, expansion or modification of non-conforming uses.
(C) Community Development staff’s determinations. The Community Development Staff may decide certain matters as designated by the Appeal Authority Board, and consistent with guidelines established by this chapter, the Utah Code and the rules adopted by the Appeal Authority. Pursuant to this authority, the Community Development Director or designee may decide all cases which are routine in nature, uncontested, do not impact on the character of the neighborhood, are primarily brought about by recent changes in the Zoning Ordinance creating a large number of non-conforming structures or uses, and which the Appeal Authority has granted on an almost routine basis. The specific types of decisions the Community Development Director or designee is authorized to make shall include:
(1) Determination of a non-conforming use which can be verified by substantial evidence. Substantial evidence, for the purpose of this section, shall mean official documents, including any written correspondence, receipts, permits or documents issued by a public body or agency thereof and the like that may establish the truth of the matter asserted by the applicant;
(2) Consider additions or alterations to existing buildings and structures which are non- conforming as to height, area or yard regulations; provided, the addition follows the existing wall lines and no additional dwelling units are added to the building or structure;
(3) Change in status of a non-conforming use to an equally intensive or a less intense use than that immediately preceding the proposed use; and
(4) Final review and approval on plans where the Appeal Authority has required that a final plan be submitted for special approval, showing that all the requirements imposed by the Appeal Authority in granting the original approval have been complied with. All decisions of the Community Development Director or designee made under this section may be appealed to the Appeal Authority.
(D) Appeals to the Appeal Authority. Appeals may be made to the Appeal Authority by the city, the applicant, or any other person or entity adversely affected by a zoning decision administering or interpreting a zoning ordinance. All appeals shall be made as follows.
(1) The appeal shall be made within 30 days of the action or decision being appealed from by filing a notice of appeal with the Appeals Authority with the Community Development Department.
(2) The notice of appeal shall specify the grounds for the appeal and circumstances related thereto. The notice shall allege that there was error in the order, requirement, decision or determination made by an official or officials in the administration or interpretation of the zoning ordinance. A notice failing to allege such error or specifying the grounds for appeal may be summarily dismissed by the Appeals Authority with or without prejudice. Response to the above requirements shall be set forth in detail in the notice of appeal. The person or entity making the appeal shall have the burden of proving that an error has been made.
(3) All papers constituting the record upon which the action appealed from was made shall be transmitted to the Appeals Authority.
(4) The Appeals Authority shall set the appeal for hearing to be held within a reasonable time from the date the appeal is received. Written notice of the date set for hearing the appeal shall be mailed to the applicant at least seven days before the appeal hearing date. After hearing the appeal, the Appeals Authority may reverse or affirm, wholly or partly, or may modify the order, requirement, decision or determination appealed from and may make such order, requirement, decision or determination as ought to be made and, to that end, shall have all the powers of the officer or body from which the appeal is made.
(5) The filing of an appeal shall stay all proceedings and actions in furtherance of the matter appealed, pending a decision of the Appeals Authority. Said stay shall exist unless the Planning Commission or Community Development Director or designee certifies to the Appeals Authority, after the notice of appeal shall have been filed, that by reason of facts stated in the certificate, the stay would cause imminent peril to life or property. In such case, proceedings shall not be stayed otherwise than by restraining order which may be granted by the District Court on application, notice and due cause shown.
(6) The concurring vote of three members of the Appeals Authority shall be necessary to reverse any order, requirement, decision or determination of any administrative official, Planning Commission or agency, or to decide in favor of the appellant.
(7) The city, or any person adversely affected by any decision of the Appeals Authority, may petition the district court for a review of the decision, provided the petition is filed with the court within 30 days after the Board’s decision is final. In the petition, the appealing party may only allege that the Appeals Authority’s decision was arbitrary, capricious or illegal. The Appeal Authority may, after finding that it is in the best interest of the city to do so, stay its decision pending district court review.
(E) Variances.
(1) A variance is a device which grants a property owner relief from certain provisions of the zoning ordinance when, because of the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographical conditions of the property, compliance would result in a particular hardship upon the owner, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience or a desire to reduce financial difficulties.
(2) Unless otherwise provided in this chapter, the Appeals Authority may grant a variance from the requirements of any provision of the zoning ordinance to the extent that such a grant shall be consistent with the provisions of this section. Notwithstanding, the spirit of this chapter must be observed and substantial justice done. Further, a previous variance can never set a precedent. Each case must be considered only on its individual merits. The Appeals Authority may grant a variance only if:
(a) Literal enforcement of the zoning ordinance would cause an unreasonable hardship for the applicant that is not necessary to carry out the general purpose of the zoning ordinance;
(b) There are special circumstances attached to the property that do not generally apply to other properties in the same zoning district;
(c) Granting the variance is essential to the enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same zoning district; and
(d) The granting of the variance will not substantially affect the General Plan and will not be contrary to the public interest; and the spirit of the zoning ordinance is observed and substantial justice done.
(3) In determining whether or not enforcement of the zoning ordinance would cause unreasonable hardship under this section, the Appeals Authority may not find an unreasonable hardship unless the alleged hardship:
(a) Is located on or associated with the property for which the variance is sought; and
(b) Comes from circumstances peculiar to the property, not from conditions that are general to the neighborhood.
(4) In determining whether or not enforcement of the zoning ordinance would cause unreasonable hardship under this section, the Appeal Authority may not find unreasonable hardship if the hardship is self-imposed or economic
(5) In determining whether or not there are special circumstances attached to the property under this section, the Appeal Authority may find that special circumstances exist only if the special circumstances:
(a) Relate to the hardship complained of; and
(b) Deprive the property of privileges granted to other properties in the same district.
(6) The applicant shall bear the burden of proving that all of the conditions justifying a variance have been met.
(7) Variances, once granted, shall run with the land.
(8) Use variances may not be granted by the Appeal Authority, nor by any other body.
(9) In granting a variance, the Appeal Authority may impose additional requirements on the applicant that will:
(a) Mitigate any harmful effects of the variance; or
(b) Serve the same or similar purpose of the standard or requirement that is waived or modified.
(Prior Code, § 29.04.020) (Ord. 07-13, passed 7-19-2007)