§ 606.055  CRIMINAL LAW JURISDICTION.
   (A)   A person is subject to criminal prosecution and punishment in the municipality if any of the following occur:
      (1)   The person commits an offense under the laws of the municipality, any element of which takes place in the municipality;
      (2)   While in the municipality, the person attempts to commit or is guilty of complicity in the commission of, an offense in another jurisdiction, which offense is an offense under both the laws of the municipality and the other jurisdiction or, while in the municipality, the person conspires to commit an offense in another jurisdiction, which offense is an offense under both the laws of the municipality and the other jurisdiction, and a substantial overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy is undertaken in the municipality by the person or another person involved in the conspiracy, subsequent to the person’s entrance into the conspiracy. In any case in which a person attempts to commit, is guilty of complicity in the commission of, or conspires to commit an offense in another jurisdiction as described in this division (A)(2), the person is subject to criminal prosecution and punishment in the municipality for the attempt, complicity or conspiracy, and for any resulting offense that is committed or completed in the other jurisdiction;
      (3)   While out of the municipality, the person conspires or attempts to commit, or is guilty of complicity in the commission of, an offense in the municipality;
      (4)   While out of the municipality, the person omits to perform a legal duty imposed by the laws of the municipality, which omission affects a legitimate interest of the municipality in protecting, governing or regulating any person, property, thing, transaction or activity in the municipality;
      (5)   While out of the municipality, the person unlawfully takes or retains property and subsequently brings any of the unlawfully taken or retained property into the municipality;
      (6)   While out of the municipality, the person unlawfully takes or entices another person and subsequently brings the other person into the municipality; or
      (7)   The person, by means of a computer, computer system, computer network, telecommunication, telecommunications device, telecommunications service or information service, causes or knowingly permits any writing, data, image or other telecommunication to be disseminated or transmitted into the municipality in violation of the law of the state or municipality.
   (B)   In homicide, the element referred to in division (A)(1) above includes the act that causes death, the physical contact that causes death, the death itself, or any other element that is set forth in the offense in question. If any part of the body of a homicide victim is found in the municipality, the death is presumed to have occurred within the municipality.
   (C)   (1)   The municipality includes the land and water within its boundaries and the air space above that land and water, with respect to which the municipality has either exclusive or concurrent legislative jurisdiction. Where the boundary between the municipality and another jurisdiction is disputed, the disputed territory is conclusively presumed to be within the municipality for purposes of this section.
      (2)   The courts of common pleas of Adams, Athens, Belmont, Brown, Clermont, Columbiana, Gallia, Hamilton, Jefferson, Lawrence, Meigs, Monroe, Scioto and Washington counties have jurisdiction beyond the north or northwest shore of the Ohio River extending to the opposite shore line, between the extended boundary lines of any adjacent counties or adjacent state. Each of those courts of common pleas has concurrent jurisdiction on the Ohio River with any adjacent court of common pleas that borders on that river and with any court of Kentucky or of West Virginia that borders on the Ohio River and that has jurisdiction on the Ohio River under the law of Kentucky or the law of West Virginia, whichever is applicable, or under federal law.
   (D)   When an offense is committed under the laws of the municipality, and it appears beyond a reasonable doubt that the offense or any element of the offense took place either in the municipality or in another jurisdiction or jurisdictions, but it cannot reasonably be determined in which it took place, the offense or element is conclusively presumed to have taken place in the municipality for purposes of this section.
   (E)   When a person is subject to criminal prosecution and punishment in the municipality for an offense committed or completed outside the municipality, the person is subject to all specifications for that offense that would be applicable if the offense had been committed within the municipality.
   (F)   Any act, conduct or element that is a basis of a person being subject under this section to criminal prosecution and punishment in the municipality need not be committed personally by the person as long as it is committed by another person who is in complicity or conspiracy with the person.
   (G)   This section shall be liberally construed, consistent with constitutional limitations, to allow the municipality the broadest possible jurisdiction over offenses and persons committing offenses in, or affecting, the municipality.
   (H)   For purposes of division (A)(2) above, an overt act is substantial when it is of a character that manifests a purpose on the part of the actor that the object of the conspiracy should be completed.
   (I)   As used in this section, “computer”, “computer system”, “computer network”, “information service”, “telecommunication”, “telecommunications device”, “telecommunications service”, “data” and “writing” have the same meanings as in Ohio R.C. 2913.01.
(ORC 2901.11)